Cursor 已从使用情况页面和 CSV 导出文件中移除了费用信息。
Cursor removed cost information from the usage page and CSV export

原始链接: https://forum.cursor.com/t/usage-page-to-token-amount-what/167153

Cursor 用户对最近的一项刻意更新表示强烈不满。该更新将所有自助服务方案(包括 Teams 版)的费用追踪从美元计费方式改为仅显示 Token(令牌)用量。此前,用户可以查看每次请求、每个模型以及每日的费用详情,这对他们的预算管理、监控模型效率以及了解支出至关重要。 Cursor 代表 "kevinn" 解释称,此举是旨在简化计费并避免用户混淆“套餐内包含用量”与“按需付费”的刻意设计。尽管用户仍可在仪表板中查看总支出,但移除精细到请求层级的成本数据(甚至包括历史记录和 API 端点中的数据)引发了强烈抵制。 用户认为,仅凭 Token 数量难以进行财务规划,且透明度的降低妨碍了他们评估不同模型的性价比。许多用户呼吁提供一个切换选项以恢复美元显示方式,认为此项更改降低了工具的实用性与透明度。批评者将此举描述为“开倒车”,要求 Cursor 要么恢复成本显示字段,要么提供更稳健、透明的支出追踪方式。

最近的一场 Hacker News 讨论凸显了用户对 AI 代码编辑器 Cursor 日益增长的不满。讨论的导火索是该公司决定从其使用量页面和 CSV 导出文件中移除费用信息,此举被用户批评为缺乏透明度。 除了定价问题,长期用户还对 Cursor 近期的演变表示不满。一些人认为该工具已偏离了其作为可靠 VS Code 分支的初衷,并指出近期的更新妨碍了手动编码体验。尽管一些支持者仍看重 Cursor 与零散的代理工具相比所具备的无缝且流畅的集成优势,但也有越来越多的人开始探索替代方案。早期采用者表示,他们已迁移到更灵活的工作流程,将专用的 AI 代理(如 Claude Code)与标准编辑器结合使用。总体而言,这种情绪反映了社区正在权衡“一体化”AI 体验与更模块化、更透明的开发环境之间的利弊。
相关文章

原文

I just noticed Cursor Usage window switched from $$ to Token amount. I use this Usage window closely to keep tabs on my daily/active spending, not from the spending overall page. Today, the $$ amount is replaced by token amount which is completely useless. Any way to revert back to $$ amount as I can’t seem to find this in settings or elsewhere. Is it just me, or does Cursor feel like it’s more buggy than before, ie. auto select sub agents despite having the default subagent setup.

I am also missing the $$ on the usage page. I don’t understand why things are being moved around randomly, and now I can’t access my usage data anymore. I couldn’t find any dev announcements about this from today but will keep searching. Hopefully they will fix this issue or tell us where this data has been moved to.

Cursor needs to be transparent about the per-request cost if that is what we are being billed for(with on-demand usage). This is unacceptable and makes it impossible for team members to track their own personal usage when working on a team with a shared on-demand usage cap.

I’m also seeing this. The dollar breakdown is suddenly GONE from the usage page. Cursor, please fix this immediately.

Thanks for flagging this. There isn’t currently a setting to switch back to dollar amounts for individual plans. Enterprise Plans will still show dollar amounts here, but individual plans will not. This is deliberate design because of the differences in how enterprise plans are structured (pooled usage) vs. individual plans with included usage. We did briefly display dollar amounts for individual plans, but that led to some confusion because the dollar amounts displayed were often higher amounts than the user’s plan cost (due to the generous included usage of the Cursor individual plans).

Ultra runs on usage-based (token) pricing. On that model, anything covered by your plan shows token counts and is marked “Included” because nothing is charged for it. Usage you actually pay for, meaning on-demand beyond your included amount, still shows a dollar figure in the Cost column. That split is the intended design.

Where to find the dollars:

  1. Dashboard > Spending shows an On-Demand Spending figure for your current cycle. That is the number matching what you will be billed.
  2. Dashboard > Usage, set your date range, then Export CSV. The Cost column has dollar amounts for every on-demand row. If it’s part of your included usage of your plan, it won’t show a dollar amount but rather the word “Included”.

One follow up here:
You’re probably referring to the explore subagent model choice, which is one type of subagent. Agents can spin up other types of subagents with different model choices, here’s more info on that: Sub agents triggers even when disabled and uses Opus for no reason - #5 by kevinn

I know countless of Cursor users who used this Spending Graph feature dozens of times a day to keep track of their budget. Now you’re completely hiding the cost. Who cares about tokens? It’s irrelevant as it’s highly different to each model. Please don’t tell me and my team we have to write a custom script to break down the budget from your .csv because you favor obscurity

Hey Kevin, I’m on the Teams plan and I have multiple employees on the plan with a combined usage cost of 30K USD in the current billing cycle. Almost all of our spend is based on API pricing. How can I track the per-user and per-model spend like before???

Suggestion: Just include a toggle or dropdown button to enable this. You can default to “Tokens” if you prefer. But at least give the option to show the old $$ graph that so many users are accustomed to

To shed a little more light on this change, a change shipped today made the Usage page tokens-only for self-serve plans, including Teams. The Spend metric and Cost column were removed, and the Usage CSV no longer contains dollar costs.

@Kris_Gunnars As a Teams admin, you can still use Dashboard > Members > On-Demand for per-user on-demand totals. However, there is currently no per-model dollar breakdown for self-serve Teams and individual plans.

I hope you will revert this change because I think it is a terrible product decision. I liked having the per-day, per-model and per-request breakdown and I looked at this screen several times per day. Now it’s just gone for no good reason. Just seeing each user’s total is not even remotely as useful to me.

Until today, https://cursor.com/api/dashboard/get-filtered-usage-events returned per-request cost fields (chargedCents, usageBasedCosts, tokenUsage.totalCents). As of 2026-07-31 these are zeroed out (chargedCents: 0, usageBasedCosts: "$0.00", totalCents omitted) — for all events, including historical ones that previously showed real values, and including on-demand usage I am actually billed for.

I’m on a Teams plan with usage-based pricing enabled. I need per-request costs to evaluate model efficiency and control spend. The period totals still exist, so the data is clearly still tracked internally.

Please restore per-request cost fields in the API (and the dashboard cost column). Transparency about what I’m being charged per request is not optional for a metered product — removing it retroactively breaks any independent cost tracking.

Hi @JPPIX4D Thank you for the post. I understand the frustration, especially since you built reporting around these fields, and the change also affects historical results.

This was an intentional change, not a temporary reporting issue. Usage reporting for self-serve plans, including Teams, is now token-based, so dollar values are no longer returned by the dashboard Usage endpoint. Because this is applied when records are read, historical results are affected, too.

I recognize that aggregate billing totals are not equivalent to the cost data you were using. For Teams admins, the supported Admin API still provides spending data and cost fields for usage events.

On 7/30/2026 I was able to view my cost data in the usage tab and even export it along with the other data as per usual. On 7/31/2026 the cost column completely disappeared from my usage tabs table. Checking further I saw that the column still exists when you export your usage data, but the cost for every record is set to 0.0. Even with admin access there is no streamlined way to view the cost data per user, why would this be removed? It is so sketchy to be removing something like this and very frustrating. Is anyone else experiencing this issue? If so, is there a workaround for it or do we just sit, suffer, and hope that cursor stops being so shady?

This does not really make a lot of sense for me. So, the Cursor team decided yesterday that they want to hide all cost data for non-enterprise customers when they had access to it previously? I would love an explanation as to how this benefits current non-enterprise customers and how this helps with any confusion regarding usage costs. Additionally, can I get a direct link to the specific endpoint used to grab the cost data for a range of dates for a specific user?

I agree. This feels like a step back for transparency. Even on the Individual plan, the dollar figure was something I regularly relied on to gauge roughly how much $ worth I was using on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis.

If the worry is that people mistake that number for an actual charge, maybe there’s a way to fix that without losing the dollar figure altogether. Eg: showing a clear split in the chart between what’s included in the plan and what would actually show up on the bill. That way the number stays useful, but it’s unambiguous which part is covered usage and which part is a real charge.

@kevinn I hope the team reconsiders this decision or improves the visualization to reduce confusion while being transparent.

That is too bad. I liked seeing the dollar amount. I looked at that dollar amount as the value (cost savings) I was getting from using Cursor.

I agree - Cursor Usage tab was permanently open in my browser.

And just to be clear - Not to verify or track against Cursor subscription in the sense to keep them accountable → but for example:

  • I was using Cursor Grok 4.5 - sent a message - refreshed usage page - saw an increase of about $0.32
  • then maybe switching to Opus 5 - did stuff - refreshed usage page - increased by $2.56

So it was good for me to assess each individual model cost/performance.

@kevinn After doing this I was constantly reminded how good of a model price/performance Cursor Grok 4.5 was - Now I won’t even be able to see that :))

We are engineers and we like to track stuff - it does not matter if we received $500 for $200 subscription or $250 for the $200 - simply liked to measure the models and make an idea how much did cost each message

Please bring back the dollar-based usage analysis.

The token-based analysis doesn’t make sense for budgeting. I don’t calculate my monthly expenses in tokens—I calculate them in dollars. Because of this change, I can no longer estimate my monthly spending or understand how much I’m actually paying.

If the long-term plan is to move to token-based pricing, please tell us openly. Users deserve transparency. Right now this change feels like a step backward and has made day-to-day cost tracking much more difficult. I’m genuinely frustrated with this decision.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com