TinyNES 评测——一款极其小众的 NES 游戏机
TinyNES Review – A Super Niche NES Console

原始链接: https://blog.lon.tv/2023/02/05/tinynes-review-a-super-niche-nes-console/

TinyNES 是一款小众的开源主机,它在复古硬件与现代可靠性之间架起了一座桥梁。与普通的 NES 克隆机不同,它使用了从旧硬件上拆卸下来的原装(或兼容)CPU 和 PPU 芯片,为那些比起 FPGA 或软件模拟更青睐真实芯片的纯粹主义者提供了原汁原味的体验。 该主机采用了插槽式芯片设计,易于维护,并能比老化的原版主机提供更纯净的音视频输出。然而,它严格保留了仅支持复合视频输出的特性,没有原生 HDMI 接口,忠实于原始硬件的局限性。虽然该主机在设计上支持罕见的 RGB PPU 芯片——且未来计划推出免焊接升级模块——但当前版本专注于为收藏者提供“真实”的 NES 体验。 归根结底,TinyNES 服务于复古游戏社区中的一个特定群体,他们认为现有的解决方案(如模拟器或 FPGA 克隆机)缺乏真实感。它的存在证明了即便在竞争激烈的市场中,人们对于能够保留 8 位时代原始特质与手感的高质量硬件级机器,依然有着执着的追求。

这篇 Hacker News 帖子讨论了“TinyNES”这一小众游戏主机项目,以及复古游戏领域的普遍趋势。 讨论始于一位用户对订单交付的担忧,项目创作者随后做出直接回应,确认新一批产品即将发货,并预告了一款即将推出的无焊式 RGB 升级板。 话题迅速转向复古游戏硬件的现状。用户们就原装硬件与现代改装及模拟器之间的优劣展开了辩论。一些收藏家更看重“原汁原味”的体验,他们常使用烧录卡、RAD2X 等 HDMI 转接器或 RGB 改装方案,以弥合老式主机与现代显示器之间的差距;而另一些人则认为,现代模拟技术与真实硬件已别无二致,且更加便捷。 讨论中还涉及了关于 NES 视频输出的技术细节,参与者澄清了原版 NES 主机并不具备原生 RGB 输出功能,通常需要像 NESRGB 板这样的改装才能实现。归根结底,这篇帖子凸显了该社区的一个反复出现的主题:使用原装硬件时的“繁琐”与追求便捷、高质量“即开即玩”的复古游戏体验之间的矛盾。
相关文章

原文

My latest review is of a device designed for a very specific niche called the TinyNES. On the surface this might look like yet another NES clone console but it merges original NES hardware with a modern, open source design.

What it uses from the original NES are the CPU and PPU (graphics processor) chips. Although the NES uses a 6502 processor, the CPU chip used on the original NES and Famicom had its sound hardware also on the CPU die.

The TinyNES can be ordered with genuine chips but is also compatible with clone processors as the originals are no longer being manufactured. It’s not clear whether the genuine chips in this particular unit were pulled from dead consoles or leftover unused parts. The CPU and PPU chips on the TinyNES are socketed and can be swapped out easily.

The rest of the components are new and modern resulting in cleaner video and audio output. But nothing is added here – the console only outputs composite (not RGB component) and has no HDMI option. The design is open source so it’s conceivable somebody could add this functionality in later.

Part of the reason behind a lack of modern video options is that the original NES PPU output its video signal on a single pin as a composite of red, green and blue. Later revisions of the PPU did offer RGB output options but most NES and Famicom systems had the single pin output.

The TinyNES main board does support the RGB variants of the PPU but they are apparently much harder to find. There will be a solderless RGB add-on module available in the future for those lucky enough to have one of the RGB PPU chips.

So with no modern video outputs why does this thing exist when a real NES can be acquired for less money? Viewer Destructodisk has a good summation:

Now obviously this is a very niche device for an audience that wants something very specific… but there is a point and reasoning to it. Much that same as some people don’t like emulators because it isn’t as close to how real hardware plays. Some people aren’t satisfied with FPGAs. And then there’s the extreme that aren’t satisfied with the quirks a video signal add on brings. Its great everyone seems to have a perfect device being built for them.

The fact that the makers of the TinyNES found enough people willing to fund its production is proof enough that there’s a market for it. Not a large one, but a market nonetheless.

A big thank you to viewer Handheld Obsession for letting us borrow his unit for the review!

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com