去年,美国移民及海关执法局(ICE)采集了近百万人的 DNA,其中包括幼儿。
ICE Collected Nearly 1M People's DNA Last Year–Including Young Children

原始链接: https://www.wired.com/story/ice-dna-collection-fbi-codis/

2025年,雨果·莫雷诺-门德斯(Hugo Moreno-Mendez)因在例行缓刑检查中拒绝采集DNA拭子而被起诉,这一事件凸显了联邦基因监控规模的巨大扩张。尽管非法移民问题通常属于民事范畴,但美国国土安全部(DHS)正越来越多地从被美国移民和海关执法局(ICE)拘留的人员身上采集DNA,以充实联邦调查局的“联合DNA索引系统”(CODIS)。 乔治城大学法学院隐私与技术中心的研究显示,国土安全部已成为全美刑事DNA数据库的最大贡献者。仅在2025年,“被拘留者”索引库就增加了近100万份档案,其中ICE可能贡献了92万份样本。一旦录入CODIS,这些档案(许多来自没有犯罪记录的人员,包括家庭和儿童)将无限期保留在系统中,使全国执法部门能够将其与未决案件进行交叉比对。 包括几位美国众议员在内的批评人士认为,这种做法实际上是将非刑事拘留者视为暴力罪犯。尽管国土安全部为该项目辩护,称其为必要的安全和身份识别措施,但这种采集规模的迅速扩大(2025年平均每天录入2700份档案)引发了人们对针对移民群体进行大规模监控的隐私和公民自由的重大担忧。

《连线》杂志近期的一篇报道揭露了美国移民及海关执法局(ICE)收集了近一百万份 DNA 样本(其中包括儿童的样本),这一消息在 Hacker News 上引发了关于隐私、政府越权及生物识别监控效用的激烈讨论。 批评者认为,大规模 DNA 数据库极易被滥用,他们对未来的误用、数据泄露以及数据采集初衷可能被偏离并演变为更广泛的监控(即“任务蔓延”)表示担忧。许多评论者对“值得信赖的政府”这一理念持怀疑态度,指出即使初衷是良性的,此类数据库也容易出现错误、误报以及遭到威权主义的利用。参与讨论者还强调,生物数据最终可能被用于医疗或就业方面的歧视。 相反,一些支持者认为,收集 DNA 可以作为验证亲属关系、打击人口贩卖的有效工具。然而,这一观点遭到反驳,警告称此类辩解往往掩盖了更广泛的系统性滥用。这场讨论最终反映出一种根深蒂固的矛盾:高效治理的愿望与维护基本身体隐私权之间的冲突。许多用户得出结论,认为国家长期滥用权力所带来的潜在危害,远超任何即时的行政便利。
相关文章

原文

On March 13, 2025, Hugo Moreno-Mendez arrived at the McLennan County Probation Department in Waco, Texas, expecting a routine probation check-in. Instead, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers were waiting to arrest him.

According to a criminal complaint reviewed by WIRED, officers drove Moreno-Mendez to a nearby ICE field office. There, one deportation officer after another approached him with the same demand.

Open your mouth.

One officer tried to take his fingerprints and swab the inside of his cheek for DNA. He refused. Then another tried. Then a third. Each time, Moreno-Mendez refused.

Four days later, Moreno-Mendez was charged with failing to register as a noncitizen and refusing to provide DNA while in federal custody—the latter a misdemeanor that, as of 2021, ICE itself said it was unaware had ever been accepted for prosecution.

Moreno-Mendez took both counts to trial. On August 18, 2025, a magistrate judge in Waco found him guilty of each and sentenced him to time served.

Moreno-Mendez’s case is part of a sweeping expansion of DNA collection from people held for civil immigration violations—a federal campaign that, backed by the threat of prosecution, funnels the genetic profiles of nearly everyone in ICE custody into an FBI database built for criminal investigations. New research from Georgetown Law's Center on Privacy and Technology estimates that the Department of Homeland Security has become the largest single source of new genetic profiles in the nation's criminal DNA system, with ICE alone potentially adding as many as roughly 920,000 profiles in 2025.

The vast majority of people in ICE custody have no criminal conviction, and residing in the US undocumented is typically a civil, not criminal, offense. Yet once the DNA profiles of detained people enter the FBI’s Combined DNA Index System, or CODIS, law enforcement agencies across the country can compare them against evidence from unsolved crimes—and against crime-scene DNA collected years or even decades from now. The physical sample, which holds a person's entire genome, sits in a federal laboratory indefinitely.

The expansion of DNA collection has extended to families held in immigration detention, sparked lawsuits over the collection of DNA from protesters and others who allege they should never have been subjected to the program, and drawn congressional scrutiny after lawmakers learned that children were being swabbed at a family detention center in Dilley, Texas.

“None of the families at Dilley have been convicted of a crime,” US representatives Joaquin Castro, Greg Stanton, and Nanette Barragán said in a joint statement to WIRED. “They do not belong in a database meant for violent criminals, especially children.”

In response to questions from WIRED, a DHS spokesperson defended DNA collection as a border-security and identification measure, saying CBP takes samples from people arrested on federal charges and from detained noncitizens who are subject to fingerprinting and not otherwise exempt. Asked about children whose profiles were submitted to CODIS, DHS pointed to a separate DNA-testing program used to verify family relationships. That program is distinct from the collection at the center of WIRED’s reporting. DHS did not address Georgetown’s estimate that ICE may have added hundreds of thousands of profiles to CODIS in 2025.

For most of the program's history, migrant DNA collection played out at the border, where Customs and Border Protection swabbed people it took into custody. ICE's own contribution was marginal. Internal training slides obtained by Georgetown through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) show ICE collected 3,609 DNA samples in fiscal year 2020 and 16,392 more through mid-May of fiscal 2021—roughly 20,000 in all. CBP was operating on a different scale entirely: Agency spreadsheets Georgetown obtained and analyzed show it sent the FBI the DNA of at least 1.36 million people between October 2020 and the end of 2024, more than a dozen times ICE's rate during the same time period.

Georgetown's new report suggests the program entered an entirely different phase in 2025. FBI records show the "detainee" index of CODIS—the sub-index where DHS-collected profiles are stored—reached 3,345,692 profiles by December 2025, growing by roughly 995,000 that year alone. That is more than 2,700 people a day, every day, for a year.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com