我不读人工智能创作的小说。
I won't read LLM authored fiction

原始链接: https://mccormick.cx/news/entries/why-i-won-t-read-llm-authored-fiction

作者认为,阅读虚构作品对于保持创造力至关重要,因为它是个人写作的催化剂。通过吸收另一位作者独特的“统计特征”——即特定的词汇选择和语言模式,读者的文笔会变得更加生动且富有层次感。 与往往遵循常规结构的非虚构作品不同,虚构文学具有深刻的个人色彩与创造性。作者指出,这就是为何人工智能生成的文学作品令人感到乏味:由于大型语言模型被设计为从“统计学常态”中采样,它们会将读者引向平庸的平均值,而非卓越。为了避免算法带来的同质化影响,作者得出结论:虚构文学若要具有意义,必须由人类创作,以确保文本保留那种激发读者个人声音所需的、独特的灵魂品质。

这篇 Hacker News 讨论帖探讨了人们对人工智能生成的小说和音乐所持的怀疑态度。原帖作者表示拒绝阅读大语言模型创作的小说,这一观点得到了评论者的共鸣,他们认为艺术的价值源于人类的体验,即创作背后的“生活、爱与痛苦”。一些用户认为,人类的瑕疵和留给读者的解读空间是文学不可或缺的组成部分,而 AI 无法复制这些特质。 然而,许多参与者指出这种立场具有讽刺意味,并指出用户很可能已经在不知情的情况下消费了 AI 生成的内容。目前的共识是,正如电影中高质量的视觉特效往往难以被察觉一样,高质量的 AI 输出已变得与人类作品难以区分。尽管有人认为逻辑上的不完美是使文学作品引人入胜的“人性信号”,但另一些人则认为人类创作与机器创作之间的界限正变得日益模糊。归根结底,这场讨论突显了两种观点之间的分歧:一方将艺术视为纯粹的人类交流行为,而另一方则意识到向 AI 辅助内容转变的趋势已无处不在,且大多未被察觉。
相关文章

原文

Aug. 5, 2026

There have been periods of my life where I stopped reading. I don't mean that I stopped reading entirely - I still read articles and blogs and journals, but I could not find the time to read fiction novels.

Fiction makes you think and feel in a way that other writing doesn't. I've noticed that my own writing comes much easier and fresher when I'm reading fiction regularly. I think I've figured out why this is.

When you read something that's written by somebody else it has a certain statistical profile. They will choose certain words over a certain other words. This is well established fact and can even be used to a degree for fingerprinting who wrote a piece of text. Every writer at a given point in time has their own unique profile. When you absorb someone else's statistical profile like this, by reading their words, it nudges your own in a new and more interesting direction. Your words begin to sparkle slightly. Your statistical profile is no longer the stodgy old one you had before but it's now been given a shine and a luster by the fresh new shape of the words you're reading.

I think this effect is stronger for fiction than for technical writing or non-fiction because people write fiction in a different way. Non-fiction is more biased towards the normal. Put simply, fiction is written from the heart. It's creative. Maybe it's closer to your raw, "natural" statistical profile than other types of writing.

I've been trying to figure out why I don't want to read a novel where most of the words are written by an LLM, even if a human designed the novel at a high level. It feels gross. I think this is the reason. The statistical profile of LLM writing is close to the normal. That's literally how LLMs work. They sample from a distribution that captures a median way of writing. I simply don't want my mind pushed towards the statistically normal when I am reading fiction. That's the exact opposite of what I want from the experience.

For any piece of fiction that I read from the 2020s and beyond, I want to know "this text was written by a human being in their own words".

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com