亚马逊绕过吉尔罗伊社区投票,强行推进人工智能数据中心项目
Amazon circumvents Gilroy community vote for AI data center

原始链接: https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/data-centers/amazon-secretly-circumvents-community-vote-for-massive-ai-data-center-45-year-old-rules-lock-gilroy-residents-out-of-public-comment-window

亚马逊在加利福尼亚州吉尔罗伊(Gilroy)建设数据中心引发了当地民众的不满。这并非完全是因为项目本身,而是因为民众认为缺乏知情权和参与度。 尽管该项目于2020年启动申请程序,并遵循了数十年前制定的当地分区法规,但许多居民感到被排斥在外。虽然市政府官员和亚马逊公司坚持认为已遵守了标准的公告及公众意见征询期,但一些市民表示,他们在意识到项目影响时为时已晚。市长格雷格·博佐(Greg Bozzo)为该项目进行了辩护,强调了其带来的经济效益,包括税收、建筑就业机会和社区捐款,并指出类似的工业项目过去在推进时并未引发公众抗议。 针对水资源消耗和透明度方面的担忧,亚马逊承诺将采用废水回收系统,并通过开放日活动加强与社区的沟通。尽管公司和市政府官员强调项目的合规性和经济价值,但这一情况凸显了既有的官僚程序与公众对数据中心行业快速扩张日益增长的透明度要求之间存在的鸿沟。

Hacker News 上近期的一场讨论批评了《华尔街日报》关于亚马逊在加州吉尔罗伊建设人工智能数据中心的报道。尽管新闻标题暗示亚马逊“绕过”了社区投票,但评论者指出,该项目遵循的是 45 年前制定的现有工业区划法规,这些法规并未要求此类开发项目必须经过公众投票。 这场辩论凸显了围绕人工智能基础设施快速扩张而产生的深刻分歧。支持者认为,该项目合法且遵循了长期以来的行政程序,若基于不断变化的公众情绪来阻挠项目,会破坏经济稳定性。然而,批评者认为,这些设施带来了显著的“负面外部性”,包括高昂的水电消耗、噪声污染以及对当地资源的潜在压力,而居民对此并未得到充分告知。 许多参与者将此问题定性为企业“加速推进”基础设施建设与公众参与自身环境决策权之间的冲突。虽然有些人将这种抵制视为对工业增长的可预见的“邻避效应”(NIMBY),但另一些人则认为,这反映了在监管环境往往偏向企业开发而非社区参与的情况下,人们为了争取对大型科技公司的问责制与透明度而进行的合理斗争。
相关文章

原文

The community of Gilroy, California, about 30 miles southwest of San Jose, was surprised when an Amazon data center started construction in their town last month. But as many projects like these have been suffering from opposition and delays across the country, the Wall Street Journal reports that this specific site avoided scrutiny by adhering to local zoning rules set 45 years ago.

Amazon’s Gilroy project sits on a 56-acre piece of farmland between a Walmart Supercenter and the Gilroy Premium Outlets. The company and the city didn’t exactly keep the project secret when it started its application in 2020. In fact, there were disagreements between the tech giant and the city government during the process. The publication noted that some Amazon officials were frustrated by slow permitting progress, which was delayed by at least one year. At the same time, the city pushed back on some of the company’s requests, especially if they were no longer up for discussion.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com