科技很烂:你必须用钱包投票,否则一切都不会改变。
Tech sucks: You have to vote with your wallet, or nothing will change

原始链接: https://82mhz.net/posts/2026/08/tech-sucks-you-have-to-vote-with-your-wallet-or-nothing-will-change/

作者反思了开发者 Theo 发布的一段视频,视频中他严厉抨击了苹果封闭的生态系统、劣质的开发工具以及掠夺性的商业行为。虽然作者认同苹果的政策对开发者和用户都造成了“虐待关系”,但他认为该视频的前提具有讽刺意味。尽管 Theo 十分愤怒,但他仍在持续购买苹果的最新硬件来资助这家公司,而作者认为这恰恰是苹果所希望看到的。 最终,作者指出,对于一家纯粹以利润为导向的企业来说,愤怒的视频无关紧要。只要用户仍被困在“生态系统”中并持续贡献收入,苹果就没有任何改变的动力。引用戴夫·鲁珀特(Dave Rupert)关于理性消费的理念,作者认为挑战苹果霸权的唯一途径是打破这种依赖循环。尽管离开该生态系统既困难又需要付出代价,但作者坚持认为消费者必须停止支持那些对待他们不公的公司,并敦促读者放弃苹果,转而支持更小、更具道德感的替代方案。

关于“用钱包投票”的 Hacker News 讨论,核心在于个人消费选择能否有效挑战苹果等科技巨头的统治地位。 多数参与者认为,“用钱包投票”是一种无效且往往带有宿命论色彩的策略。批评者指出,由于智能手机和应用程序生态系统对于参与现代社会生活至关重要,许多用户根本没有可行的替代方案。此外,巨大的贫富差距意味着个人的消费习惯无法与科技巨头的影响力相抗衡。 许多贡献者主张,解决方案在于政府监管和反垄断执法,而非个人的消费选择。他们认为,打破数字壁垒、推动互操作性,并通过立法追究企业的责任,才是打破垄断控制的唯一途径。 虽然有人建议,“投票”应包括传播意识、采用开源替代方案或改变就业方向,但各界共识依然是必须进行系统性改革。这场辩论突显了一种深刻的挫败感:用户因缺乏决定市场标准的集体力量,而被迫支持“恶意”的科技生态系统,这使得监管成为恢复软件自由的唯一可行之路。
相关文章

原文

Recently, someone on Mastodon shared this video titled "Apple Changed..." by a guy named Theo who I'd never heard of, but according to his website he's a guy who "builds things". Apps, presumably. I had nothing better to do (sleepless night...) and I enjoy a good Apple bashing, so I watched the video. In it, Theo spends an hour ranting about how terrible the experience of developing apps for the iPhone/iPad is, how Apple takes 30% of all app store and in app purchases, how awful Xcode is as a development environment and how even as a developer you have to get Apple's approval to run your own app on your own device. And how you need a second device (MacBook) to build an app for your target device (iPad) because Apple won't allow you to build the app straight on the iPad itself. And a lot more.

I'm not an iOS developer (thank god), but I'm of course aware of Apple's restrictive policies when it comes to approving and running apps on their devices, and I have no doubt that everything he says in the video is true, and that it's really an abysmal experience developing for iOS, and that as a developer (and I'd argue as an Apple user, too) you're essentially trapped in an abusive relationship from which there seems to be no escape.

But as I watched this video I kept thinking, this guy is so rightfully angry and pissed off at Apple... and yet he's sitting in front of a brand new MacBook, a brand new iPhone and a brand new iPad.

He correctly points out towards the end of the video that the only thing that matters to Tim Cook is making more money for Apple. There's literally nothing else he cares about. Not your user experience, not the environment, and also not the mental health of children and teenagers using these devices, as much as he tries to pretend that he does. The only metric that matters to Apple is "number on spreadsheet go up". And so yes, Theo might make an hour long video about everything that he thinks sucks at Apple, and he may be right about all of it.

But he still gave them thousands of Dollars.

Apple wants his money, and he gave them exactly what they wanted. The fact that he's making angry videos is simply irrelevant to Apple, because they know that when the next iPhone or MacBook is released, he'll buy that too. So why would they change anything? Because he made an angry video? They might watch it some time when they're bored and need a good laugh, but then they'll go right back to making their devices even shittier for the end user and developer. Because they can. Because people keep buying them.

Like it or not, but if being the customer of a company starts to feel more like being in an abusive relationship rather than a mutually beneficial one, it's time to think about leaving. Yes, this is scary. It's painful. It requires sacrifice. And yes I know, the ecosystem. They lure you in with the promise of "everything just works", and once you're in, you can't leave, at least not without a great deal of pain. You know what that's called btw? A trap.

Leaving sucks. But there's no other way. As long as you keep throwing money at the corporations who treat you badly, why would they change?


This train of thought is heavily influenced by a post by Dave Rupert called "Double your business with companies you like" in which he argues that even though it might not feel like it, we as consumers do have an influence over which company thrives and which doesn't, because where we spend our money influences whose sales numbers go up and whose go down. In the world of tech this is not easy of course because there are a lot of huge and shady corporations out there, and they have an enormous amount of power. But there are still alternatives.

Apple might still try to present themselves as the underdog whose products are for the people who "think different", but they're not anymore, and they haven't been for a long time. They're the evil megacorporation now, and it's time to leave them behind and go to find the real underdogs to support.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com