美国商品期货交易委员会宣布市场进入紧急状态,并命令 Kalshi 在纽约继续运营。
CFTC declares market emergency, orders Kalshi to continue to operate in New York

原始链接: https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9281-26

美国商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)援引其紧急权力,要求交易所 KalshiEX, LLC 继续运营。此前,纽约州总检察长莱蒂西亚·詹姆斯(Letitia James)提起诉讼,以违反州博彩法为由,申请临时限制令,试图阻止 KalshiEX 在全美范围内提供事件合约。 CFTC 主席迈克尔·S·塞利格(Michael S. Selig)谴责了纽约州的干预行为,并断言联邦法律已为衍生品交易所确立了统一的全国性框架。他认为,这些属于州际金融市场,不应受“拼凑的州博彩法”管辖,且委员会在法律上有义务维护市场秩序和联邦管辖权。 此举是 CFTC 为捍卫其监管权力所做持续努力的一部分。该委员会经常在法庭上挑战包括纽约州、亚利桑那州和伊利诺伊州在内的多个州,以阻止这些州对受联邦监管的衍生品市场实施州级限制。CFTC 坚持认为,此类州级行动威胁到了市场稳定性,并破坏了国会建立的集中监管流程。

美国商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)近日动用紧急权力,推翻了纽约州针对预测市场平台 Kalshi 采取的法律行动。 这场冲突始于纽约州寻求临时限制令(TRO),试图阻止 Kalshi 在该州运营,理由是该平台属于未经许可的赌博活动。总部位于纽约的 Kalshi 则坚称其为受联邦监管的衍生品交易所。 观察人士的争论重点在于以下三个方面: 1. **临时限制令的范围:** 有报道称纽约州意在全国范围内叫停该平台,但也有观点认为该州仅旨在阻止其在州内运营。 2. **管辖权:** CFTC 主张,作为一家注册交易所,Kalshi 属于联邦优先管辖范畴,州一级的赌博限制规定对其不适用。批评者则认为这是“欺诈”或监管越权,并指出预测市场往往与赌博并无二致。 3. **政治背景:** 批评人士指出,由于高知名度政治人物参与了预测市场公司,CFTC 的此次干预被质疑是出于政治动机,旨在优先维护联邦对州级消费者保护及赌博监管的控制权。 该案件凸显了联邦商业权力与各州在赌博监管方面传统警察权力之间持续存在的紧张关系。
相关文章

原文

WASHINGTON — The Commodity Futures Trading Commission today exercised its emergency authority in response to KalshiEX, LLC’s notification of a market emergency and ordered the exchange to continue to operate in accordance with the Commodity Exchange Act’s Core Principles.

KalshiEX, LLC notified the Commission of the emergency after New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a complaint against the exchange in state court. In the lawsuit, filed on July 31, New York seeks a temporary restraining order prohibiting KalshiEX, LLC from offering all event contracts nationwide and more than $36 billion in damages. 

The CEA requires the Commission to provide a uniform national market in derivatives transactions. As part of this obligation, the CFTC ensures public confidence in its markets by safeguarding market resilience and orderliness. The Commission is also tasked with providing competitive, fair, and efficient markets that protect the price discovery process of trading in the centralized derivatives markets. Major market disruptions hamper these efforts. 

“New York intends to make event contract derivatives waste away under its iron curtain of state gaming laws before the courts get the chance to issue final rulings,” said Chairman Michael S. Selig. “Congress did not intend for derivatives exchanges to be regulated under a patchwork of state gaming laws. These are financial exchanges that offer financial instruments and operate across state lines. They match the bid from a resident of one state with the offer of a resident from another state and submit the trade to a clearinghouse that backstops the transactions of customers throughout the country. New York has no business regulating these interstate financial markets. The Commission is required by law to ensure order in these markets, and that is what we have done today.”

States have attempted to bring enforcement actions against CFTC-regulated DCMs in state and federal courts throughout the nation. To protect the jurisdiction granted to it by Congress, the CFTC has filed lawsuits against Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois, Kentucky, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin. The Commission has also filed amicus briefs in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth and Ninth Circuits and the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. 

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com