你通往成功的关键,不在于更多的运气或努力。
Your key to success isn't more luck or hard work

原始链接: https://julienreszka.com/blog/your-key-to-success-isn-t-more-luck-or-hard-work/

虽然努力和运气常被视为成功的关键,但研究表明,“你认识谁”——即你的社交网络——才是向上流动的决定性因素。经济学家拉杰·切蒂(Raj Chetty)的一项研究发现,经济关联度(拥有高收入的朋友)比学校质量或社区人口结构更能预测未来的收入。 关键在于,数据揭示了你最亲密的朋友并非职业晋升的主要推动力。相反,“弱关系”——那些你仅有泛泛之交的人——在开启机遇和创造就业机会方面要有效得多。虽然许多人花费数年时间优化自己的职业道德,但研究表明,这不如建立一个多元且广泛的专业网络更有影响力。 为了成功,不要只专注于埋头苦干,应将精力转向有意识地培养更广泛的熟人圈子。通过与你既定圈子之外的人建立联系,你将为职业成长创造一个单靠努力无法实现的实际杠杆。简而言之:与其投入更多工时,不如优先经营那些关系尚浅的人脉。

这篇 Hacker News 讨论帖围绕一篇题为《你成功的关键既非运气,也非努力》的文章展开。社区对此普遍持怀疑态度,用户们围绕专业成就的真正驱动因素进行了辩论。 一些评论者认为该文标题有博眼球之嫌,暗示作者更像是在推广课程或产品,而非提供真知灼见。讨论的焦点之一是社会资本的作用;许多参与者认为,“你认识谁”以及裙带关系——而非能力、努力或运气——才是成功的首要因素。 另一些人则对文章中引用的有关经济多样性和收入增长的具体数据提出了质疑,一些用户通过个人经历论证,社会流动性更多地依赖于教育等传统途径,而非多元化的社交网络。总的来说,这场讨论反映出人们对当代成功建议的愤世嫉俗,倾向于认为结构性优势(如任人唯亲)往往重于个人努力。
相关文章

原文

Hard work is grinding and only partly reliable. Luck is random by definition. Research on who you know is far more specific than most networking advice.

Three things supposedly decide whether you succeed: how hard you work, how lucky you get, and who you know. Hard work gets treated as the real answer, the one thing fully within your control, the reason someone made it and someone else did not. The best evidence available says that is not the deciding factor. Who you know is.

Raj Chetty and a team of economists used 21 billion Facebook friendships from 72 million Americans to measure economic connectedness, the share of a person's friends who earn more than they do. Children who grow up with high economic connectedness earn 20 percent more as adults on average than otherwise similar children who do not, a gap equal to growing up in a family making 47,000 dollars a year instead of 27,000. It was the single strongest predictor of upward mobility they found, ahead of school quality, segregation, and poverty rates.

  • People near the bottom of the income ladder have almost no rich friends. Fewer than 2 percent of their friends are in the top 10 percent of earners.
  • People at the top cluster with each other instead: 34 percent of their friends come from that same top 10 percent.
  • Network cohesion and high rates of volunteering, the kind of social capital most people actually try to build, showed no meaningful link to upward mobility.

The same pattern shows up in how people find jobs, not just how much they eventually earn. A classic 1973 survey found that 56 percent of men got their job through a contact they saw only occasionally, not a close friend. A 2022 randomized experiment on 20 million LinkedIn users confirmed the effect is causal: moderately weak ties, people you know a little but not well, created more job mobility than close ones.

Hard work and luck are both real, but neither is a lever you can pull whenever you want. The circle of people you know a little, not well, is a lever you can pull, the same way an algorithm pulled it for millions of LinkedIn users just by suggesting the right people to them. Most people spend a decade optimizing how hard they work and never spend an afternoon on who they know. The data says they have it backwards.

Before crediting hard work for your best opportunity, look at who actually got it for you. The people who move your career and your income are usually not your closest contacts or your longest hours. Build the layer of people you know a little, on purpose.

Post on X

Free to try, no login needed. Results saved locally in your browser.

  • Describe what you do and your own interests, and find people who align.
    Find your people
联系我们 contact @ memedata.com