如果其他国家接种的疫苗更少,我们为什么不能问个究竟?
If Other Countries Give Fewer Shots, Why Can't We Ask Why?

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/if-other-countries-give-fewer-shots-why-cant-we-ask-why

在这篇文章中,杰克·海尔纳(Jack Hellner)对比了美国与其他几个国家(包括德国、英国、日本和西班牙)的儿童疫苗接种计划。作者指出,美国儿童接受的疫苗剂量和注射次数明显多于其他国家的同龄人。 海尔纳质疑美国疫苗接种量过高是否在医学上具有必要性,并暗示其他国家在接种疫苗较少的情况下也达到了相当的健康成果。他批评媒体未能调查这些差异,也未对既定的公共卫生叙事提出质疑。 最后,作者将话题转向对美国医疗体系的更广泛批判,特别是抨击了《平价医疗法案》。他认为该法案的设计初衷并非为了让医疗变得负担得起,而是为了将医疗体系转向政府管控。他建议,采取扩大医疗补助计划(Medicaid)或高风险库等更具针对性的方法,会是更有效的替代方案。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Jack Hellner via AmericanThinker.com,

By age 18, a child in the United States can receive roughly 30 to 75 total vaccine doses if they follow standard schedules and get annual flu shots. Fewer shots are needed because vaccines are combined.

By comparison, in Germany, the Robert Koch Institute (via the Standing Committee on Vaccination, STIKO) recommends routine protection against about 12 to 15 infectious diseases for children. Because Germany relies heavily on multi-component combination shots (like the 6-in-1 hexavalent vaccine), children receive roughly 11 to 14 actual physical injections.

Elsewhere in Europe, in England, children receive around 20 to 25 individual vaccine doses from birth to age 14, delivered via roughly 14 to 16 actual needle injections.

Similarly, under Japan’s routine immunization program, children receive around 20 to 22 individual injection shots.

And in Spain, children receive around 15 to 18 individual injection shots from birth through adolescence under the official public health system.

These comparisons raise some obvious questions.

Doesn’t it look like children in the United States get more shots today, and there would be a valid reason to recommend fewer?

Do children in countries with fewer shots have worse health results?

Do other countries ignore science when they have fewer shots?

Wouldn’t it be nice if the media were curious instead of just repeating talking points to trash President Donald Trump?

And vaccines aren’t the only area of health care where such questions should be asked.

Obamacare is one of the worst and most costly bills ever passed, yet the media and other Democrats still falsely claim that it makes health care more affordable.

If Democrats just wanted to cover the poor and those at high risk, they would have just expanded Medicaid and high-risk pools instead of destroying the whole system.

They never wanted affordable care. They wanted government-controlled care.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com