既有野心,又有父亲的责任
Being ambitious and being a dad

原始链接: https://nicholascharriere.com/blog/being-ambitious-and-being-a-dad/

作者探讨了科技创业者全心投入的雄心与陪伴子女需求之间的严峻张力。从历史来看,许多成功的“伟大”构建者往往是缺席或不称职的家长,他们为了追求职业遗产而将育儿工作转嫁他人。作者拒绝接受这种权衡,认为与孩子相处的质量并不能取代数量。 作者承认,有了孩子自然会减少工作时间,并使个人的职业产出与“无子女”时期相比产生明显的差距,但他拒绝接受职业成功与优秀父亲身份之间的二元对立。相反,他重新定义了雄心,将其涵盖了这两个方面。 通过极度的纪律来优化时间、剔除“废话”、优先考虑健康并设定严格的界限来保护家庭时间,作者相信在两个领域都能出类拔萃是可能的。最终,他呼吁建立一种新的成功标准:拥有“雄心勃勃到足以成为一位雄心勃勃的父亲”的勇气,证明尽管两者兼顾困难重重,但这依然是一个值得真正构建者挑战的目标。

Hacker News 上的讨论“雄心壮志与为人父”反映了一场极具争议的辩论:职业抱负与积极的父亲角色是否可以共存。 许多贡献者认为,“鱼与熊掌兼得”的说法是一个神话,甚至是一种导致忽视家庭的“死亡崇拜”。他们强调,职业上的成功往往是运气和外部支持(例如由伴侣承担育儿重担)的结果,而不仅仅是个人的毅力。许多家长表达了对优先考虑职业目标而非孩子的遗憾,并指出陪伴孩子的时间是有限的,事后无法弥补。 相反,另一些人则将孩子视为提高生产力的催化剂。他们认为,为人父母迫使人们进行更好的时间管理,增强专注力,并将“雄心”重新定义为为家庭建立稳定的未来。虽然有些人承认两者兼顾需要残酷的优先级排序并放弃休息时间,但他们坚持认为,做一个称职的父亲比创办任何初创公司都更有意义。 最终,共识倾向于这种张力是与生俱来的。一个人能否在两者上都取得成功,取决于个人的具体情况、价值观,以及是否愿意接受这样一种现实:选择一条道路必然意味着牺牲另一条。
相关文章

原文

When I was going through YC, I didn’t mention my seven month old daughter to anyone. Now a few years later I have two kids, a dog and a very packed schedule. My kids are the best thing in my life. For years, my work was my life. Now my life competes with my work.

I don’t think I’m alone. Here’s Paul Graham in Having Kids:

Some of my worries about having kids were right, though. They definitely make you less productive. I know having kids makes some people get their act together, but if your act was already together, you’re going to have less time to do it in.

I love building, learning, and competing. Life before kids was straightforward: I worked hard and centered my life around things I love: computers, technology, friends. I moved to SF, worked at some awesome companies, met a wonderful girl and built a strong relationship. A huge amount of my time was spent on work, and yet there was still some left for that and more. Turns out, you have a lot of time when you don’t have dependents.

All the people I admire most are builders. I have devoured biographies and studied many great founders. Unfortunately this led me to an uncomfortable conclusion: most of them are horrible parents.

Steve Jobs literally abandoned his daughter Lisa because “the time wasn’t right” (he was focused on Apple). Einstein abandoned one kid1 and was constantly absent, daydreaming about work around his other two, to the point where his wife divorced him and took them. Elon Musk has so many children and companies that he mechanically cannot spend any significant amount of time with any of them. Edison, Ford, Ferrari,… the list goes on and on. Most biographies of great founders I’ve read have had another story etched in between the lines: a pretty bleak one of a bad parent.

I know many ambitious parents; it’s not an uncommon combination. Most of them are willing to make a choice that I will not: delegate the parenting away. I do not believe the quality time theory. I firmly believe in maximizing the quantity of time spent with them; there are no diminishing returns for them on that front. This is somewhat problematic, and unfortunately it gets worse. The time spent is even more important when they’re young, which of course happens to coincide with the prime of my career.

I’ll find myself planning my work or reflecting on how much I accomplished today or in the last week and the result is clear. I’m a productive and well organized person, but comparing the output of parent-me to the kidless-me in a given week reveals a visible gap. Everyone knows life is short. Now that I have kids, it feels 10x shorter.

This sucks. I am ambitious: I wake up every morning with a burning fire in my stomach to build awesome things. In this, I differ from Paul Graham:

I hate to say this, because being ambitious has always been a part of my identity, but having kids may make one less ambitious.

I am not less ambitious. But I am also ambitious about being a great dad.

My anecdotal observations show a pretty strict dichotomy: great fathers and great achievers rarely overlap. Rarely is not never though. Some figures in technology (Paul Graham, DHH, Jeff Dean, even Mark Zuckerberg) seem to be pushing on both fronts with rare success. Often the pattern is early success, but not always. Frankly even if I couldn’t find the pattern, I would still not accept defeat.

I don’t have a perfect magical solution. I’m voicing a frustration, but I am also rejecting the choice. I’ve come to redefine ambition for myself: ambition is being a great dad as well as building great things. I acknowledge and accept that it is much more difficult than just aiming for one or the other, and both are hard enough in their own right. But hard is the point of ambition, right?

My strategy is pretty simple: stay focused, don’t waste time on bullshit, keep improving execution. I do this by carefully clarifying what I want my work to be, focusing on health to maximize energy, setting clear rules on time with kids (weekday dinners, weekends prioritize family) and completely removing time-wasting activities. With clear goals and discipline, my plan is to achieve compounding gains.

I am writing this because I never hear anyone say it.

Be ambitious enough to be an ambitious dad.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com