一项针对7700名员工的研究显示,远程办公人员的幸福感最高。
Remote workers report the highest well-being in study of 7,700 employees

原始链接: https://www.colorado.edu/today/2026/08/12/remote-workers-report-highest-well-being-study-7700-employees

近期一项针对 7700 多名医疗保健行业员工的研究表明,雇主们普遍担心远程办公会损害员工士气和组织凝聚力,但事实并非如此。该研究发表在《心理学前沿》杂志上,结果显示完全远程办公的员工幸福感最高,而现场办公的员工幸福感最低。 与“远程办公会导致孤立”的传统观念相反,研究发现,远程员工与同事及公司文化之间的联系感,丝毫不亚于甚至高于办公室员工。此外,研究结果表明,远程办公的主要益处在于提升了员工幸福感,从而降低了员工流失率。研究人员将这些积极成果归因于员工自主权的增加、对工作环境掌控力的提升,以及免去了通勤等日常压力。 首席作者斯特凡妮·约翰逊(Stefanie Johnson)认为,强制要求员工返回办公室往往是出于习惯而非数据支持。虽然面对面交流对于建立初步关系仍有价值,但研究指出,优先考虑员工的灵活性和幸福感,比强迫员工回办公室能带来更好的长期效益。归根结底,研究建议为员工提供工作地点选择权,是提高留任率和满意度的更有效策略。

一项针对某大型医疗机构 7,704 名员工的研究发现,远程办公的员工比在岗办公的员工拥有更高的幸福感。然而,Hacker News 上的相关讨论揭示了一个复杂且往往两极分化的现实,这表明远程办公的成功在很大程度上取决于个人性格、工作职责和公司文化。 **讨论要点:** * **远程办公的双峰性:** 用户认为远程办公的成功并非普适。虽然许多人受益于灵活性和无需通勤,但另一些人则面临孤独感、工作与生活界限模糊以及生活规律丧失的困扰。 * **“适应性”论点:** 回归办公室(RTO)政策的批评者认为,公司往往未能顾及不同的工作风格。那些感到被“妥善安置”的员工——无论是通过居家办公环境还是设计良好的办公空间——表现最为出色。 * **通勤税:** 对许多人来说,远程办公的主要好处是找回了原本浪费在通勤上的时间;通勤被视为一种“无报酬”的压力源,对健康和生产力产生负面影响。 * **文化担忧:** 许多矛盾源于糟糕的管理实践,例如“强迫性”的混合办公模式——员工通勤来到办公室,却整天都在忙于 Zoom 会议。许多人指出,Slack/Teams 所带来的“时刻在线”文化压力,往往与传统办公室的压力相当,甚至有过之而无不及。
相关文章

原文

For years, many employers have worried that work-from-home arrangements leave employees isolated, disconnected from coworkers and more likely to leave their jobs.

But according to a new study, remote workers are doing better than many employers realize.

Researchers analyzed survey data from 7,704 employees at a large healthcare organization. One pattern stood out: Employees who worked fully remotely reported the highest levels of well-being, while those who worked entirely onsite reported the lowest. The study also found little evidence that remote workers felt less connected to colleagues or workplace culture.

"This suggests you let people work remotely if they want to work remotely," said Stefanie Johnson, professor of organizational leadership and information analytics at the Leeds School of Business and co-author of the study, published in July 2026 in the journal Frontiers in Psychology. "Taking away people's choice of how they work is probably not going to help them in terms of their well-being."

As companies continue to debate remote work, many leaders worry that employees need to be in the office to stay connected, work well together and remain committed to their organization. Johnson said the research doesn't always support those concerns.

"The data from our study and others suggest remote and hybrid work result in better outcomes than return-to-office mandates," she said. "Leaders are not making decisions based on data. I think they are just returning to what they are used to."

Rethinking remote work

Johnson, who co-authored the study with Alyssa Lezcano, Stephanie Zajac and Courtney Holladay of the MD Anderson Leadership Institute in Houston, said the results surprised her. She thought employees who split their time between home and the office might have the best of both worlds.

"I actually thought you would be happiest if you were part time out of the office," she said. "Then every once in a while you get to see people, get that human connection."

Instead, the data pointed in a different direction.

Among employees in the study, well-being was highest for fully remote workers, followed by hybrid employees and then onsite workers. 

The findings also cast doubt on one of the main arguments for bringing employees back to the office: that people need to be together in person to feel connected.

Employees in the study were asked to describe their organization's culture in a handful of words. Remote workers were slightly more likely than their hybrid and onsite peers to use words associated with teamwork, inclusion and support.

"People who are remote actually said more things that indicated they had more positive connections, even though they were remote," Johnson said.

Still, Johnson said face-to-face interaction can play an important role in helping coworkers build relationships, especially if they are just starting out in their careers.

"Remote works better after you know people," she said. "So there is still a benefit of having some face time."

Staying power

The researchers also examined employee turnover one year after the survey was completed.

They found that employees with higher well-being were less likely to leave the organization. Work location itself was not a strong direct predictor of turnover. Instead, remote work was associated with higher well-being, which in turn was associated with lower turnover.

"It makes sense. If you have higher well-being, you're less likely to leave your job," Johnson said.

Participants completed the workplace survey in 2023, and researchers compared those responses with actual turnover records one year later. Of the employees surveyed, roughly half worked onsite, with the remainder split between hybrid and fully remote arrangements.

Flexibility matters

The study did not explore why remote workers reported higher well-being, but Johnson points to a growing body of research on autonomy and flexibility.

One explanation is that remote workers have greater control over their work setup and daily schedule, she said.

"If you have control over your environment, you tend to have more positive outcomes," she said.

Working from home can also eliminate many everyday stressors.

"Spending a lot of time in traffic is negatively related to well-being," Johnson said. "There are so many little stressors associated with being in the office."

Those stressors can include arranging child care, hiring help for pets or managing the logistics of getting to and from work, she said.

Johnson said the study points to a broader lesson for employers navigating return-to-office debates. Rather than focusing only on where employees work, organizations may get better results by investing in employee well-being.

"I think flexibility is here to stay," she said.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com