法院削减了亚历克斯·琼斯因虚假散布桑迪胡克小学枪击案阴谋论而被判处的5000万美元赔偿金。
Court Reduces $50 Million Judgment Against Alex Jones Over False Sandy Hook Hoax Claim

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/court-reduces-50-million-judgment-against-alex-jones-over-false-sandy-hook-hoax-claim

得克萨斯州一家上诉法院将针对《信息战》(Infowars)节目主持人亚历克斯·琼斯的判决金额从5000万美元减至约600万美元。最初的判决源于2022年的一场诽谤案审判,起因是琼斯曾谎称2012年桑迪胡克小学枪击案是一场骗局。 法院裁定,原审法官在陪审团作出裁决后,允许原告尼尔·赫斯林和斯嘉丽·刘易斯通过声称遭受“严重情绪困扰”来修改诉讼以寻求更高赔偿的做法是错误的。上诉法院否决了这一逾期修改,并恢复了每位家长75万美元的惩罚性赔偿法定上限。 已申请破产的琼斯称该裁决为“重大胜利”,但其法律团队打算进一步上诉。相反,原告律师马克·班克斯顿认为减损金额“无关紧要”,并指出琼斯仍面临其他判决带来的总计超过10亿美元的债务。值得注意的是,讽刺新闻媒体《洋葱报》近期已通过破产程序收购了《信息战》。

相关文章

原文

Authored via Stacy Robinson via The Epoch Times,

A Texas appeals court on Aug. 21 drastically reduced a judgment owed by Infowars host Alex Jones, shrinking the amount from $50 million to around $6 million, over his commentary falsely calling the 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting in Connecticut a hoax.

Jones and his company, Free Speech Systems LLC, appealed the multimillion-dollar settlement after a jury in 2022 found him liable for “defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress” after the shooting in which 20 children and 6 faculty were killed.

The Texas Court of Appeals for the Third District denied many points of Jones’ appeal, and did not reverse a previous $4.2 million judgment for one of the plaintiffs.

But it did side with his argument that Neil Heslin and Scarlett Lewis, whose 6-year-old son, Jesse, died in the attack, should not have been allowed to alter their lawsuit after the jury verdict in order to seek more damages.

The parents had amended their suit to say the hoax claims caused them to be “disabled” by “severe emotional disturbance.” That meant Jones would be liable for “injury to a disabled person,” and the normal $750,000 cap would not apply.

“Concluding that the trial court erred by allowing the parents to amend their pleadings after the trial, we will modify the judgment by limiting their exemplary damages awards to a total of $750,000” per parent, Chief Justice Darlene Byrne wrote in the three-judge panel’s unanimous decision.

The panel said a trial court “abuses its discretion” when it allows plaintiffs to amend their claims after a jury verdict, because then the defendant “could not anticipate or defend against the pleading.”

Jones called the decision a “massive victory for the First Amendment” in an Aug. 21 post on X. His legal team intended to take the case to the Texas Supreme Court to reclaim the rest of the judgment, the post also said.

The parents were part of a group that brought multiple suits against Jones based on statements he made after the event.

The court summarized the parents’ accusation against Jones: They alleged he said that “Sandy Hook parents were participating in a sinister manipulation plan to fool the public or that a shadowy cabal of elites pre-planned the murder of their children and controlled the coverage of the event through the media manipulation.”

Parents testified that they were harassed and received death and rape threats as a result of his statements.

Mark Bankston, who represented Lewis and Heslin in Texas, said that the ruling doesn’t make a big difference in the case.

“The families care not at all about this irrelevant ruling which affects only two of the 19 claims they all share. Jones still faces over a billion dollars of liability, so this changes absolutely nothing. All it does is highlight the absurdity of Texas law,” Bankston said in a statement.

Last October, the U.S. Supreme Court also rejected an appeal by Jones to overturn a separate $1.4 billion judgment against him. He filed for bankruptcy in 2022, and satire news outlet The Onion has purchased Infowars.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com