Athlon 的终结
The End of an Athlon

原始链接: http://www.os2museum.com/wp/the-end-of-an-athlon/

在研究复古的 Athlon XP 处理器时,作者遇到了一款脆弱的倒装芯片 CPU,在拆卸散热器时,该 CPU 发生了物理碎裂。尽管有一大块硅片脱落,但处理器依然能够正常工作,这表明在拆卸受力之前,芯片内部可能已经存在微裂纹。 在 21 世纪初,英特尔和 AMD 都采用了“倒装芯片”封装技术来应对日益增长的散热需求。然而,由于这种设计将处理器的硅核心暴露在外且缺乏保护,它极易受到机械损伤。散热器安装不当(尤其是压力不均)经常导致硅片崩角或破碎。 由于这些耐用性问题,两家厂商最终都放弃了裸露芯片的设计,转而采用带有金属顶盖的处理器。这些新设计在提供相当散热性能的同时,显著增强了结构完整性。虽然英特尔 LGA 插槽等后续设计将易损点从芯片转移到了主板上,但这一转变标志着脆弱的倒装芯片时代的终结。

Hacker News 最新 | 过往 | 评论 | 提问 | 展示 | 招聘 | 提交 登录 Athlon 的终结 (os2museum.com) 6 分,由 userbinator 发布于 38 分钟前 | 隐藏 | 过往 | 收藏 | 讨论 | 帮助 指南 | 常见问题 | 列表 | API | 安全 | 法律 | 申请 YC | 联系 搜索:
相关文章

原文

When I was researching the mess related to strange and poorly documented CPUID bits in the Athlon MP and XP processors, I had to swap a lot of CPUs. This was uneventful in most cases… but only most.

When I removed the heatsink from one unlucky Athlon XP, the processor looked like this:

And this is what the heatsink looked like, with a piece of the CPU glued to it:

There are two interesting things about this. One is that the CPU worked just fine until a good chunk of it came off. The other is that removing the heatsink did not need any particularly excessive force, although some heatsinks do have a tendency to get stuck on.

Based on the shape of the “extracted” piece of silicon, I suspect there was a relatively long and straight micro-crack in the silicon which did not noticeably impact the operation. But when force was applied, the micro-crack gave way, and then a whole big chunk of silicon came off.

Notice how the right-hand side of the gouge in the CPU is very straight, whereas the left-hand side shows typical fracture marks.

It is notable that around 2000, both Intel and AMD used flip-chip PGA packaging in an effort to provide better cooling (something both companies struggled with as the TDP of the processors quickly shot past 50W and approached 70-80W).

Both companies, especially Intel, gave up on this type of packaging relatively quickly. Intel only used it for some PIII models and switched to lidded CPUs for the P4 line, as well as the PIII-S processors. AMD used flip-chip packaging for PGA Athlons but not for Opterons.

The exposed silicon was a little bit too fragile and required assemblers to install heatsinks very very carefully—if installing a heatsink applied pressure that was too uneven, the silicon would crack. Many vintage flip-chip CPUs have chipped corners, although that usually does not affect operation.

Processors with lidded packaging still provided very good cooling, but compared to CPUs with exposed silicon they proved much sturdier and far less susceptible to mechanical damage. Especially Intel’s pin-less LGA processors are quite sturdy and not at all prone to mechanical damage, although the weak spot simply moved to the motherboard socket instead.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com