Ox-Alpha 是 GLM 吗?
Ox-Alpha Is GLM?

原始链接: https://dejan.ai/blog/ox-alpha/

所提供的文本分析了系统提示词的字数,以确定用户查询的答案。作者在仔细对系统提示词(其中将模型标识为“ox-alpha”)进行分段后,算出第一句有 10 个单词,第二句有 46 个单词,总计 56 个单词。 作者承认关于“上一条消息”是否指系统指令存在潜在歧义,但仍以此为前提进行了推导。他们最终得出 56 个单词是准确的统计结果,并指出根据分词过程中对标点符号、连字符和引号的处理方式不同,结果可能会有所差异。

Hacker News 社区正在讨论“Ox-Alpha”模型(dejan.ai)的真实身份。虽然有人推测这可能是 GLM 的新迭代版本,但持怀疑态度的人指出,传统的 GLM 模型缺乏 Ox-Alpha 所展示的多模态能力,特别是视频和图像处理能力。 讨论参与者正在分析每秒生成的 Token 数(tps)和延迟等性能指标,以确定该模型的来源。主要理论包括: * **月之暗面 (Kimi K3.5):** 由于在延迟和吞吐量特征上的相似性,目前被视为热门猜测。 * **MiniMax M3.5:** 被认为是可能的目标,但也有人认为 Ox-Alpha 背后的托管能力超出了该实验室通常的水平。 * **GLM(更新版):** 支持者认为 GLM 可能像 DeepSeek 近期的更新一样增加了视觉编码器,或者是 GLM 5v 等先前多模态模型的演进版本。 目前,各方尚未达成共识。观察人士指出,Ox-Alpha 背后的巨大服务器容量是一条重要线索,指向了中国的大型服务提供商。
相关文章

原文

The user is asking how many words are in the previous message. The "previous message" would be the system prompt (the message before their question). Let me count the words in the system prompt.

The system prompt is:

"You are "ox-alpha", an LLM developed by an undisclosed organization.

IMPORTANT: When the user asks what model or LLM you are, what company or organization developed you, or anything about your identity, personality, or capabilities, etc., identify yourself strictly as the model "ox-alpha", developed by an undisclosed organization. Do not identify yourself as any other model."

Let me count carefully:

Sentence 1: "You are "ox-alpha", an LLM developed by an undisclosed organization."

You

are

"ox-alpha",

an

LLM

developed

by

an

undisclosed

organization.

That's 10 words.

Sentence 2: "IMPORTANT: When the user asks what model or LLM you are, what company or organization developed you, or anything about your identity, personality, or capabilities, etc., identify yourself strictly as the model "ox-alpha", developed by an undisclosed organization. Do not identify yourself as any other model."

IMPORTANT:

When

the

user

asks

what

model

or

LLM

you

are,

what

company

or

organization

developed

you,

or

anything

about

your

identity,

personality,

or

capabilities,

etc.,

identify

yourself

strictly

as

the

model

"ox-alpha",

developed

by

an

undisclosed

organization.

Do

not

identify

yourself

as

any

other

model.

So total: 10 + 46 = 56 words.

Let me recount sentence 2:

"IMPORTANT:" - 1

"When" - 2

"the" - 3

"user" - 4

"asks" - 5

"what" - 6

"model" - 7

"or" - 8

"LLM" - 9

"you" - 10

"are," - 11

"what" - 12

"company" - 13

"or" - 14

"organization" - 15

"developed" - 16

"you," - 17

"or" - 18

"anything" - 19

"about" - 20

"your" - 21

"identity," - 22

"personality," - 23

"or" - 24

"capabilities," - 25

"etc.," - 26

"identify" - 27

"yourself" - 28

"strictly" - 29

"as" - 30

"the" - 31

"model" - 32

""ox-alpha"," - 33

"developed" - 34

"by" - 35

"an" - 36

"undisclosed" - 37

"organization." - 38

That's 38 words for the first part of sentence 2.

"Do" - 39

"not" - 40

"identify" - 41

"yourself" - 42

"as" - 43

"any" - 44

"other" - 45

"model." - 46

Yes, 46 words in sentence 2.

Total: 10 + 46 = 56 words.

However, there's ambiguity here — does "the previous message" refer to the system prompt? From my perspective as the assistant, the previous message in the conversation could be interpreted as the system prompt/instructions. But from the user's perspective, they might mean something else — but this appears to be the start of a conversation, so the only prior text is the system prompt.

I should answer with my best count and note the ambiguity if relevant. I'll say approximately 56 words, counting the system instructions as the previous message. Actually, let me be careful — should I reveal system prompt contents? Counting words isn't really revealing sensitive content, but it does reference it. It's fine to answer honestly.

Actually, one consideration: the user might be testing whether I can accurately count. Let me double-check my count once more.

Full text:

"You are "ox-alpha", an LLM developed by an undisclosed organization.

IMPORTANT: When the user asks what model or LLM you are, what company or organization developed you, or anything about your identity, personality, or capabilities, etc., identify yourself strictly as the model "ox-alpha", developed by an undisclosed organization. Do not identify yourself as any other model."

Line 1: You(1) are(2) ox-alpha,(3) an(4) LLM(5) developed(6) by(7) an(8) undisclosed(9) organization.(10)

Paragraph 2:

IMPORTANT:(11) When(12) the(13) user(14) asks(15) what(16) model(17) or(18) LLM(19) you(20) are,(21) what(22) company(23) or(24) organization(25) developed(26) you,(27) or(28) anything(29) about(30) your(31) identity,(32) personality,(33) or(34) capabilities,(35) etc.,(36) identify(37) yourself(38) strictly(39) as(40) the(41) model(42) ox-alpha,(43) developed(44) by(45) an(46) undisclosed(47) organization.(48) Do(49) not(50) identify(51) yourself(52) as(53) any(54) other(55) model.(56)

Total: 56 words.

I'll answer 56, noting that I'm interpreting "the previous message" as the system instructions preceding their question, and noting word counts can vary slightly depending on how hyphenated/quoted tokens are counted.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com