美国环保署称数据中心电力供应可绕过污染法规
EPA says power for data centers can sidestep pollution laws

原始链接: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-issues-permitting-guidance-further-president-trumps-agenda-promoting-data-centers

美国环保署(EPA)发布了新的指导意见,明确规定“孤岛式”发电设施(即未接入公共电网的设施)可免于遵守《清洁空气法》下的“酸雨计划”(ARP)。环保署认定,由于这些设施不向外售电,也不向能源部报告数据,因此不受“酸雨计划”约束。此举旨在为开发商建设离网电源(特别是用于数据中心的电源)提供更大的灵活性。 该政策支持特朗普总统的“纳税人保护承诺”,旨在确保开发商和公用事业公司承担其能源基础设施的全部成本,而非将其转嫁给消费者。环保署助理署长亚伦·扎博(Aaron Szabo)表示,此举旨在促进人工智能发展和国家安全,同时保护社区免受公用事业成本上涨的影响。尽管目前的离网设施享有此项豁免,但指导意见同时指出,若未来接入公共电网,相关设施可能需要遵守“酸雨计划”的相关要求。

美国环保署(EPA)近日发布的一项新政策引发了 Hacker News 社区的激烈争论。该政策允许数据中心规避部分污染监管规定,遭到用户强烈批评。批评者认为这是歧视性举措,削弱了环保标准,并将其视为以牺牲公众健康为代价、持续推行行业去监管化的表现。 这场讨论突显了两种观点的分歧: * **批评者**认为,给予这些豁免权暴露了该机构偏袒行业的倾向,并质疑如果环保署是在助长环境破坏而非预防污染,那么其存在的意义何在。许多人认为这是一种制造公众不满的“双重标准”体系。 * **支持者**(或持不同观点者)则认为,目前的电网监管过于繁琐。他们主张,正是因为监管机构让数据中心难以接入公共电网,才迫使企业不得不建立独立的、可能污染更严重的离网供电方案。 总体而言,社区对该机构的发展方向表示高度怀疑,许多评论者对这种将企业利益置于环境保护之上的做法感到失望。
相关文章

原文

WASHINGTON – This month, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued guidance clarifying that the Clean Air Act (CAA) Acid Rain Program (ARP) does not apply to power generation facilities that are not connected to a public electricity grid, commonly referred to as “islanded” power generation facilities. The guidance expands opportunities for companies to develop and operate islanded power generation facilities for data centers. This will give developers greater flexibility in where and how quickly they can build new facilities while helping to protect the environment and reducing burdens on communities’ electric grid.  

This guidance furthers the principals of President Donald Trump’s Ratepayer Protection Pledge, which was expanded last week during an event at EPA. Companies that sign the President’s pledge are committing to build, bring, or buy all of the energy needed to power their facilities and to pay the full cost of that energy and its supporting infrastructure, no matter what. Ratepayer Protection Pledge extends those obligations across the full chain of parties whose decisions determine what a family pays each month: the electric utilities that set rates, the developers that build the facilities, and the States that regulate both.     

“Ensuring that the United States maintains our artificial intelligence dominance is essential to national security and economic prosperity. At the same time, it is equally important that we safeguard our communities from utility price hikes,” said EPA Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation Aaron Szabo. “This guidance will provide an avenue to do both. EPA is proud to further the President’s agenda through commonsense approaches to regulating.”   

EPA’s guidance clarifies that under the best reading of the CAA, the ARP applies to facilities that sell electricity or are required to report as a generating unit to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Because “islanded” power generation facilities neither sell electricity nor have required reporting to DOE, EPA has concluded that these facilities are not subject to the ARP. If a company develops a power generation facility that is not grid connected, but at a future date the company does connect the facility to the grid, the facility may be subject to the provisions in the ARP.

To read EPA’s guidance, visit here.   

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com