Quasar 438B:欧洲领先的 AI 模型
Quasar 438B: Europe's Leading AI Model

原始链接: https://multiversecomputing.com/resources/introducing-quasar-438b-europe-s-leading-ai-model

Multiverse Computing 发布了 **Quasar 438B**,这是一款专为企业级智能体、编程及复杂多步工作流设计的高性能推理模型。作为在人工智能分析指数(Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index,v4.1.1)中得分 43 分的欧洲模型,Quasar 的表现优于 NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 等规模大得多的模型。 Quasar 的独特之处在于它在顶级智能与卓越速度之间取得了平衡,仅需 15.3 秒即可生成 500 个 token。这种效率使其在智能体任务中表现出色,包括长上下文推理(在 AA-LCR 中得分为 75.0)和终端编程。目前该模型支持英语和西班牙语,为需要可靠、低延迟性能以进行研究、文档分析和技术自动化的跨国企业提供了多功能的工具。 该模型现已通过 **CompactifAI API** 提供,团队无需大规模本地基础设施即可集成并测试其功能。通过将前沿推理能力与可部署的速度相结合,Quasar 旨在弥合高参数模型与实际应用之间的差距。

抱歉。
相关文章

原文

Quasar 438B is our flagship reasoning model, built for enterprise-scale agents and coding. It runs in English and Spanish, and it scores 43 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, the highest result of any European model in the field.

The Intelligence Index v4.1.1 combines nine evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, τ³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience and AA-LCR. Quasar's 43 puts it ahead of Mistral Medium 3.5 at 30, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra at 38 and Inkling at 42, in a field led by Claude Opus 5 at 63.

Quasar is not only intelligent, it is also fast. It returns 500 tokens, thinking time included, in 15.3 seconds. Only three models in the comparison are faster, and only one of those, Gemini 3.7 Flash, scores higher on the index. Of the models that do outscore Quasar, only two answer in under 25 seconds. The rest take between 38 and 156.

Multiverse Computing has built its position on making AI more efficient and deployable. Quasar brings that work into the 400B-plus parameter class: a reasoning model for multi-step tasks that need planning, tool use, code execution and large context, without the latency that class normally carries.

The model is available through the CompactifAI API, so teams can test it without standing up infrastructure.

The highest-scoring European model

Figure 1. Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1, a composite of nine evaluations. Higher is better.

Quasar scores 43 on the composite index. That is 13 points ahead of Mistral Medium 3.5 and 5 ahead of Nemotron 3 Ultra, which carries 112 billion more parameters.

Frontier-class speed

Figure 2. End-to-end response time: seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning time. Lower is better.

Quasar completes a 500-token response in 15.3 seconds. The three faster models in the comparison are Nemotron 3.5 Lightning at 9.4s, which scores 24 on the index, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite at 10.8s, which scores 37, and Gemini 3.7 Flash at 11.5s, which scores 56. Only the last of those is both faster and more capable.

Read it the other way and the gap is wider. Quasar scores 43 and takes 15.3 seconds. Mistral Medium 3.5 scores 30 and takes 18.8 seconds. Nemotron 3 Ultra scores 36 and takes 25.7 seconds, Inkling scores 42 and needs 48.3 secods, more than double than Quasar 438B.

Against Mistral Medium 3.5 the comparison runs one way on both axes: Quasar scores higher (43 against 30) and answers faster (15.3s against 18.8s).

Long-context reasoning

Figure 3. AA-LCR score. Higher is better.

Quasar scores 75.0 on AA-LCR, which tests the ability to extract, connect and reason over information spread across long documents. That is level with Grok 4.6 (high) at 75.0, and within a point of Claude Opus 5 at 75.7 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at 75.3. It leads Nemotron 3 Ultra by 4.0 points and Mistral Medium 3.5 by 9.7.

Long-context handling is what enterprise research, document analysis and agentic workflows are built on, and it is where Quasar comes closest to the frontier group.

Agentic coding and terminal work

Figure 4. Terminal-Bench v2.1 score. Higher is better.

Quasar scores 69.3 on Terminal-Bench v2.1, which puts agents to work in real terminal environments. It leads Mistral Medium 3.5 by 18.7 points and Nemotron 3 Ultra by 15.4, and trails the frontier group led by Claude Opus 5 at 89.1. This is the evaluation with the most headroom for Quasar, and it is where the next round of work is aimed.

The four results in one view

Table 1. Quasar 438B on the four supplied Artificial Analysis charts. Source: Artificial Analysis.

Built for enterprise-scale agents and coding

Quasar is built for organizations running software development agents, technical copilots, research systems and workflow automation. The Terminal-Bench and long-context results support agents that have to hold context, coordinate actions and work through multi-step tasks. The response time keeps those loops fast enough to sit inside an interactive product rather than a batch job.

Support for English and Spanish makes Quasar a practical foundation for European and international enterprises that need reasoning without narrowing deployment to a single language. Teams can put it to work across engineering, operations and knowledge work, wherever accuracy, context and reliable task completion decide the outcome.

More updates are coming for Quasar. Stay tuned.

Get started

CompactifAI API. Sign up and start sending requests: dashboard.compactif.ai

Artificial Analysis. Check out the benchmarks 

Contact. Reach out our team too at [email protected]

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com