娜奥米·克莱因:极端的财富具有扰乱心智的作用,会让你变成一个至上主义者。
Naomi Klein: Extreme wealth has a deranging effect. Turns you into a supremacist

原始链接: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2026/sep/12/naomi-klein-extreme-wealth-has-a-deranging-effect-it-turns-you-into-a-supremacist

在新作《末日法西斯主义》(*End Times Fascism*)中,娜奥米·克莱因(Naomi Klein)与阿斯特拉·泰勒(Astra Taylor)探讨了一种独特的末日式威权主义的兴起。与新自由主义时代不同——那时超级富豪们利用“诱惑仪式”和对公共利益的承诺来为其财富辩护——如今的亿万富翁阶层已变得肆无忌惮,不再有任何歉意。 作者认为,科技巨头和政治人物已不再有兴趣维持民主共识的门面。相反,他们以一种“令人错乱”的优越感行事,将气候变化和金融崩溃视为建立私有化飞地的增长机遇,实际上放弃了共同未来的理念。克莱因和泰勒追踪了这些趋势——从边境军事化到人工智能的武器化——是如何螺旋式上升的,其所携带的冲击力和暴力程度远超以往。 尽管前景黯淡,该书并未陷入宿命论。克莱因拒绝了历史重复带来的慰藉,敦促读者认识到当前危机的“复合性”。她提倡发起一场“财富与技术裁军”运动,并从基层抵抗中汲取灵感。最终,克莱因呼吁人们将愤怒转化为集体行动,从那些她称之为“造物叛徒”的人手中捍卫我们“共同的家园”。

这次 Hacker News 的讨论围绕娜奥米·克莱恩(Naomi Klein)在《卫报》发表的一篇文章展开,探讨了巨额财富带来的腐蚀性影响。 评论者们对克莱恩批判的广度和效用进行了辩论。一些人认为她的观点带有“正常化偏见”,指出她过于关注当代的“坏人”,而非关注债务和资源枯竭等导致社会不稳定的深层历史模式,从而未能准确识别系统性问题。相反,另一些用户则捍卫解决现代贫富差距的必要性,认为尽管危机一直存在,但当前财富集中的程度加剧了这些问题,并带来了前所未有的挑战。 辩论的很大一部分涉及行动主义哲学。批评者认为,如果将克莱恩的方法视为永久性解决方案,它显得脱离历史且可能徒劳无功。支持者则反驳称,维护民主就像做家务:即便问题反复出现且无法一劳永逸地解决,持续的积极努力对于社会的正常运转依然必不可少。
相关文章

原文

Naomi Klein’s new book starts on a mountaintop with two “faithful men gathering an audience to share their vision”. It’s a vision of a paradise city, gated at every entrance, no need for weapons there, everyone in it rich. One of the men has tears in his eyes as he describes its beauty. The opening scene of End Times Fascism, co-written with Astra Taylor, is not a metaphor, however. The men are Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff. The year is 2026, the mountain is Davos. The paradise city will be called New Gaza.

The World Economic Forum get-together in Davos, Switzerland, has always had a twin purpose – to provide a platform for the super-rich to describe all the good they are doing on poverty and climate, and to give us a glimpse into their enviable lives. This year what we witnessed was, quite brazenly, the world’s richest men gathering to discuss the real estate possibilities of a mass grave.

At that same Davos, Donald Trump announced his Board of Peace for the reconstruction of Gaza – it has delivered nothing substantial in the seven months since, but more significantly, Klein says, “we’re being hit with so many extraordinary events that it’s hard to hold on to what a big deal it is: they have announced a privatised United Nations”.

“I think we understand that wealth compounds, right? Certainly rich people understand that wealth compounds,” Klein continues, speaking to me from her peaceful, roomy study in British Columbia. “But I don’t feel like we spend a lot of time really thinking about the implications of what it means for that much wealth to be compounded, and what that does psychologically. Part of the new shamelessness we’re seeing is just what happens when this amount of financial, mediagenic, technological and military weaponry is concentrated in the hands of this very small, unaccountable group of people. They stop trying to seduce us in any way.”

Klein looks calm and curious as she delivers this message. She has a ready laugh. But then, she had the same unruffled, buoyant delivery when I interviewed her on stage in Manchester for Doppelgänger, her 2023 book in which she described how the digital world is destroying our connection to reality, and one another. In 1999, when her breakthrough work No Logo was published, she seemed exhilaratingly certain, at 29, that neoliberalism was bringing harm that we couldn’t yet even see the extent of, and nonetheless appeared centred and happy in the world. Somehow she manages to maintain this attitude, even though the news she delivers is always so convincingly, unbelievably bad.

End Times Fascism describes the world we’re in, where the components of authoritarianism are modelled everywhere you look: anarcho-libertarian economics in Argentina, the destruction of a free press in Russia, the erosion of democratic institutions in Hungary (until Viktor Orbán was deposed), “anti-immigrant neofascism” in Italy, the weaponisation of trans identity by Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil, Islamophobia in Modi’s India. But this is fascism with a difference. Its proponents are actively willing an apocalypse, or a wave of interconnected apocalypses brought forth by climate change and financial chaos, to hasten us towards a post-democratic world in which only a rich few survive to prosper.

This book started as an article in the Guardian, “which went totally viral,” Klein says. “Astra and I knew there was a lot more reporting to do, but on a personal level, did we want to spend the next year in the minds of these people, in these cultures? Then Astra said, ‘I’m down the rabbit hole, I’m gonna be listening to these guys anyway. So I may as well feel like I’m doing something about it.’ This is the reason it’s the first book I’ve co-written. When you go to dark, scary places, it’s nice to bring a friend.” Astra Taylor is also a writer, activist and documentary maker, and founded the Debt Collective, a fascinating experiment in building structured, quasi-unionised solidarity around personal debt, with the long term goals of abolishing student tuition fees, nationalising healthcare and building tenant power.

In the book, Klein and Taylor introduce us to the religious fundamentalists, Christian Zionists and Christian Nationalists in the US, readying themselves for the second coming. Describing a “bunkered state”, the authors connect climate-related disasters, a rabid anti-immigrant standing army in the form of ICE and a politics built on false promises and misinformation to depict a febrile, riven society that doesn’t know what to believe. But the truly terrifying bit is the bridging section, on tech billionaires. The super-rich have apocalypse fantasies of their own, built not on faith or ideology but on a calm and rational evaluation of how best to maintain their position; they would genuinely rather reign in hell than share in heaven. And they have all the money to make sure they get there.

“These are trends I’ve been following for a long time,” Klein says. “The privatised enclave born of shock, of disaster, I saw when I was reporting from Iraq. There’s the image of the Green Zone, this Emerald City run by the US in the middle of Baghdad, built by Halliburton and all of these private contractors, with the power to appoint a viceroy. In the final parts of The Shock Doctrine [2007], I talk about how these contractors migrated [from Iraq] to Hurricane Katrina, and the idea that these climate disasters are their next growth frontier. Reporters started calling New Orleans ‘Baghdad on the Bayou’. The gang’s all here, there’s Halliburton, there’s Bechtel, there’s Blackwater.”

But, and she cannot stress this enough, as useful as it is to know the recent history of these trends, you should not take comfort from the idea that you’ve seen it all before. “I have found the image of a spiral really useful, in terms of how to make sense of the fact that our era is both familiar and different,” Klein says. “The thing about a spiral is that you’re going round, but you’re not going to the same place. If the spiral is pointing down, it’s deeper, it’s tighter, it’s carrying more velocity, it’s carrying more force, it’s carrying more heat, it’s carrying more violence.” The image is at once poetic and extremely sobering. She proffers a brief morale boost, like someone handing you a slice of orange on your way into a war zone. “You can flip a spiral – it goes outwards, it’s the spiral of the universe.”

At the moment we’re in now, when crises and disasters hit so frequently that we’re in a constant state of disorientation and shock, the status quo isn’t static, it’s always getting worse. “There’s this impulse to read history,” Klein says. “We’ve seen it again and again. After 9/11, people were suddenly reading history books about Afghanistan and Iraq, Chomsky, trying to find their bearings. We saw it again during the pandemic, people were reading about the plagues of the past. But there’s a trap in believing that everything has happened before, that there is not a compounding effect of history. After Donald Trump was re-elected, I’ll be honest with you, Shock Doctrine sales went crazy. People were saying, ‘It’s exactly like you said,’ and I was thinking, ‘I don’t think it is’.”

The neoliberal age – for brevity let’s call it the period between the end of the cold war and Covid – was “capitalism lying on the couch in its underwear, going ‘what are you gonna do, leave me?’ In the cold war, a little competition went a long way – after the collapse of the Soviet Union, that competition is lost, capitalism stopped trying.” But there was a vulnerability to being super-rich in those days, because whether you’d come by your wealth through privatisation politics in the US or Europe, or by hastier, more kleptocratic means in ex-communist states, it was plainly public wealth that you’d captured. “So they would stage these seduction rituals, whether it was at Davos or Aspen, or at Ted, or the Clinton Global Initiative. They’d say, ‘We are going to cure the sick, and we are going to fund your schools in this new and exciting way, don’t worry about us. Don’t be afraid of our wealth. This is actually a new way of redistributing for the public good.’”

I distinctly remember that world: huge conferences like the Skoll foundation awards, where journalists would be wined and dined while watching immensely rich people hand out £20,000 prizes to grassroots clean water initiatives in Kenya. To be fair, in the era before and directly after the financial crash, there were plenty of dissenting voices about capitalist benevolence solving intractable problems like inequality. Many people, Klein at their vanguard, pointed out that it smelled like a scam. But while we were having that discussion, the wealth agenda moved on.

In the run-up to the 2024 presidential election, at the Faena Hotel in Miami, Peter Thiel hosted panel discussions titled “the enemy”, naming sustainable development goals, “precautionary principles” and “social responsibility” as those foes, rounded off with an “apocalypse ball”-themed fancy dress party . Some of the costumes, Klein and Taylor write, were “a doctor of eugenics’’; a “Haitian chef with a bloodied cat toy hanging out of his apron [a reference to the Springfield immigrant pet‑eating hoax, which spread in 2024, repeated by both Trump and JD Vance]; a couple wearing pagers as a ha-ha reference to Israel’s murderous attack in Lebanon.”

Naomi Klein and Astra Taylor. Photograph: naomiklein.substack.com

Thiel has been explicitly anti-democracy for years, writing in 2009, “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.” But other tech billionaires have had a complete volte face. “Jeff Bezos renamed a stadium in Seattle the Climate Pledge Arena, and gave out Earth prizes,” Klein points out. Elon Musk invested in electric cars and once saw himself as a saviour figure. “Any time anyone was in trouble, Musk would rush in to save them, ‘I shall save Puerto Rico’, ‘I shall save the children stuck down the mine’. It’s fun to be a superhero, right? But if you’re going to be a superhero, you should be worshipped. And people stopped worshiping them.” Now, the climate pledges are gone, replaced by a performed nihilism around averting climate crisis, coupled with a determination to build ever more data centres. “We’re not dealing with stupid people who don’t understand climate change,” Klein says. “We’re dealing with people who know very clearly what it means to wire together 35 gas turbines in Memphis.” (It means gargantuan energy and water use, as well as the destruction of air and sound quality in the vicinity, all for Musk to power Grok, his intermittently Nazi large language model.)

The speed with which previously Democrat-leaning billionaires fell in behind Trump in 2024 was jaw-dropping. “I don’t think that Mark Zuckerberg’s phase of seeming to care deeply about democracy and climate change was real,” Klein says. “He reincarnates as whatever is good for his business. Figures like Thiel and Musk, where there is real ideology there, are easier to understand than figures like Bezos and Zuckerberg, where it really does feel like there’s no there there, they’re just uninteresting guys that ended up massively rich.” She’s passingly interested in what combination of events created these men, many of whom were forged in the dotcom boom, when they were worshipped as gods, pictured on the cover of Time magazine in gold thrones. There’s an element of ego rage, that we just aren’t grateful enough. Ultimately, though, “we end the book concluding that wealth has its own deranging effects. It almost inevitably turns you into a supremacist because humans are creatures of story and you need a story to rationalise, why you? Why do you have so much in a time of so much want and need? And the only possible story that’s available is that there’s something about you that justifies it.”

There’s a new goading quality to the talking points of the super-rich – explicit eugenicism and Islamophobia, raw delight in the prospect of AI wiping out our jobs. It almost feels as though they’re daring us to rebel, just so that they can prove that rebellion is fruitless.

On that, though, Klein would disagree. It is not beyond our collective means to build a wealth disarmament movement, or a tech disarmament movement. She points to the Pearson brothers, KeShaun and Justin, fighting Musk’s Colossus 2 data centre in Memphis: “the way they so consciously root their struggle in the history of the civil rights movement, and the environmental justice movement in Memphis, going back to the formerly enslaved people who built Boxtown. This is where MLK was murdered, assassinated after marching with the sanitation workers in Memphis.” KeShaun Pearson leads Memphis Community Against Pollution, which has had major wins against oil pipelines, the industrial release of carcinogenic chemicals, and is now mobilising against data centres. Justin is running for Congress.

In End Times Fascism, Klein and Taylor raise Walter Benjamin’s concept “jetztzeit”, literally “now time”, a moment so pregnant with the spirit, the urgency of revolution that it marshals the energy of all movements that went before it. Again, it’s poetic, but it’s also literal, observable. If we want to oppose this new fascist strain, we really have to get a move on. “I don’t tend to use this language, I try to be measured, but I think I’ve earned the right to escalate,” she says. “The moment we’re in, people are really mad and however mad you are, it’s not enough. Because there is something so profound about no longer believing in the future, about seeing no value in our shared home, in the natural world. They’re traitors to creation.”

Klein doesn’t want for reasons to fight. “I’ve made a choice to live very close to nature in a pretty wild part of British Columbia,” she says. “On a dark night, it’s a blanket of stars. And now we see so many of what I call Elon’s space bugs [Starlink satellites] just crawling through the sky. He wants to increase that a hundredfold. Who said he could? Who gave him that right? That’s a place where I find my anger. I get really angry about the stars. I get really angry about the orcas. I get really angry about Gaza. Other people will find their anger somewhere else. We have to find our places of deepest love and fight like hell.”

End Times Fascism by Naomi Klein and Astra Taylor is published by Allen Lane on 15 September. To support the Guardian, order your copy at guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com