最高法院阻止了特朗普总统的邮寄选票令
Supreme Court Block President Trump's Mail-In Ballot Order

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/supreme-court-block-president-trumps-mail-ballot-order

美国最高法院拒绝撤销一项针对美国邮政署(USPS)规定的全国性禁令。该规定原要求联邦选举选票必须使用独特的条形码及适用于扫描的信封。最高法院在一份未署名的命令中裁定,政府不太可能在实质诉讼中胜诉,且立即执行该规定并不切实际。 布雷特·卡瓦诺(Brett Kavanaugh)大法官与凯坦吉·布朗·杰克逊(Ketanji Brown Jackson)大法官对该裁决表示赞同。卡瓦诺虽承认美国邮政署或许拥有制定此类规则的法定权力,但他认为在临近选举时强制执行这些规定是“武断且反复无常的”,因为州和地方官员没有足够的时间进行调整。塞缪尔·阿利托(Samuel Alito)和克拉伦斯·托马斯(Clarence Thomas)大法官持反对意见。 这一裁决实际上阻止了在即将到来的选举周期中实施新的邮政要求。鉴于中期选举临近,该决定为此事定下了最终基调,确保美国邮政署目前无法推进相关变更。

相关文章

原文

The nationwide injunction stands; the suspended rule would have required unique barcodes and scanner-ready envelopes...

The Supreme Court late on Sept. 14 declined to lift a nationwide injunction blocking a United States Postal Service (USPS) rule on federal ballot mail, leaving it on hold for the 2026 midterms.

The ruling in USPS v. California took the form of an unsigned order.

"The Government is unlikely to succeed on the merits of its challenge to the District Court's preliminary injunction," the order said.

"And the equitable factors applicable for obtaining emergency relief from this Court do not favor a stay."

Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in a concurring opinion with fellow Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson that "there is at least a fair prospect that the final rule falls within the Postal Service's statutory authority" but that applying the proposed rules would be "arbitrary and capricious" for the midterm elections as state and local officials "do not have sufficient time to reasonably implement the rule."

Justice Samuel Alito filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justice Clarence Thomas.

The decision is likely the final say on the rule during this election cycle, with even Talwani saying from the bench earlier this month that it was unclear how the government would implement the plans with November just around the corner.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com