标点符号的神奇力量
The Curious Power of Punctuation

原始链接: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/09/28/on-the-mark-louis-menand-book-review

在《Verb Your Enthusiasm》一书中,前《华盛顿邮报》舞蹈评论家莎拉·考夫曼提出了一套植根于报纸新闻写作限制的风格指南。她主张采取极简主义方法:优先使用强有力的动词,避免被动语态,并无情地删减形容词和副词。考夫曼认为,精确的词汇选择使“其实”之类的加强语显得多余且往往不必要。 尽管考夫曼的建议对必须在有限版面内工作的记者来说极具价值,但本文作者质疑这种僵化的极简主义是否适用于所有写作者。他指出,虽然副词和斜体等修辞手段可能被过度使用,沦为依赖的拐杖,但它们也能提供必不可少的语调、色彩和细微差别。他建议写作者不应抛弃这些工具,而应充分利用他们的“工具箱”。 归根结底,本文反映了语言如何随技术而演变。随着数字交流引入了新的表达形式——例如“电子邮件”这类名词动词化现象以及基于表情符号的标点,关于正式风格指南的争论仍在继续。虽然简洁是一种美德,但作者总结认为,严守极简主义规则不应以牺牲写作者的表达范围为代价。

抱歉。
相关文章

原文

Kaufman spent many years as the chief dance critic for the Washington Post, a job that must demand novel and unexpected ways of saying “leaping,” “lifting,” and “pirouetting”—hence her verb fascination. But she has thoughts about other parts of speech as well, and she offers a good deal of usage advice. Basically, “Verb Your Enthusiasm” is a style guide for newspaper writers: cut down on adjectives and adverbs, avoid the passive voice, prefer monosyllabic words, always say “he said” (not “he shouted,” “whispered,” “stated,” “averred,” and so on).

These tips make for good newspaper writing, but unless you are Ernest Hemingway, who began his career as a newspaper reporter and credited the Kansas City Star’s style guide with forming the basis of his style, they do not define good writing per se. Newspaper writing differs from most other writing because print-newspaper space is finite. The fewer words you use, and the more recognizable they are, the more you can say and the faster you can say it. That is where this modern minimalist verbal style comes from. Joan Didion, the mistress of concision and a Hemingway admirer, began her career writing captions and sidebars to fit around pictures in women’s magazines. Most writers don’t have those constraints, real or imaginary.

Still, Kaufman thinks that, if we are looking to speed the eye and save space, one part of speech we should be happy to throw overboard is the adverb. Her point is that if you have picked the right verb it won’t need to be modified. And many adverbs (“really,” “truly,” “literally”) do seem to be empty intensifiers. “Adverbial crutches are everywhere and misused in the extreme,” she warns (or, if you prefer, “says”). Her particular bête noire is “actually,” which she calls “one of the most annoying and overused words in the English language.”

Microsoft Word doesn’t like “actually,” either. It tells me that “more concise language would be clearer for the reader.” I know this because I have already used “actually” twice in this piece, and I set off a Word alarm both times. Did they annoy you? Wouldn’t it have been more annoying if I had used, for example, italics, as in “sentences Jane Austen wrote”? Adverbs and italics often do the same work, but unless you are J. D. Salinger, who had a genius for them, italics can seem like an artificial pumping up of significance, verbal Viagra. Still, I have used italics in that manner once in this piece. And adverbs, even the intensifiers, can add shading and tone to a sentence. I can see giving them up for directness, but it is a trade-off. Writers have a toolbox. Why not use the whole kit?

E-mail, text messaging, and the internet have swamped us with new signifiers. I no longer need parentheses; I can use a raised-eyebrow emoji instead. I don’t write to someone anymore; I e-mail or D.M. them. “E-mail” is a denominalization, a noun turned into a verb. E-mail was a thing before it was a thing you did.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com