陪审团裁定 Facebook 在剑桥分析事件中欺骗用户,需承担法律责任
Jury finds Facebook liable for deceiving users in Cambridge Analytica case

原始链接: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/facebook-liable-deceiving-users-cambridge-analytica/

新墨西哥州陪审团裁定,Facebook(Meta)在隐私保护方面误导用户,需承担法律责任。此案主要涉及“剑桥分析”丑闻,当时约 8700 万个个人资料的数据被非法收集并用于政治精准投放。陪审团认为,该公司未能保护用户数据,影响了新墨西哥州超过 200 万的全体民众。 此前,该案经过了为期两周的审理。检方成功指出,该平台在数据泄露事件以及随后针对数据经纪人的调查中误导了公众。由于该公司被认定存在超过 200 万次违规行为,法官将裁定最终罚款金额,州政府寻求每项违规处以最高 5000 美元的罚款。 Meta 表示将提出上诉,理由是援引宪法第一修正案权利,并称州政府提供的证据已过时。这一裁决对新墨西哥州而言是一次重大胜利,在其他各州达成广泛和解协议后,该州坚持独立推进此案。今年早些时候,该州还获得了另一项重大法律胜利,当时 Meta 因其平台上的儿童安全保护问题被判处近 10 亿美元罚款。总检察长劳尔·托雷斯(Raúl Torrez)称赞该裁决是追究大型科技公司责任的历史性一步。

新墨西哥州陪审团裁定 Meta(Facebook)在旷日持久的剑桥分析(Cambridge Analytica)隐私案中欺骗用户,需承担法律责任。尽管 Meta 此前已达成了一项 180 亿美元的多州和解协议,免除了其大部分未来责任,但新墨西哥州仍坚持诉讼,将其视为对企业数据行为进行问责的必要手段。 Hacker News 上的讨论呈现出两极分化的反应。许多用户对长达十年的司法审判延迟表示不满。讨论的很大一部分集中在数据泄露的技术层面,特别是该应用程序如何在未经用户同意的情况下收集其好友的数据,以及关于其对 2016 年美国大选实际影响程度的持续争论。一些评论者认为,剑桥分析公司所谓的心理侧写定位的影响力被出于营销目的夸大了,而另一些人则指出互动性测验的有效性。此外,一些参与者还讨论了严格的州级隐私执法与科技公司可能从这些地区撤出服务所带来的风险之间的权衡。
相关文章

原文

A New Mexico jury on Friday found Facebook liable for deceiving users about privacy protections on the social media platform.

It is now up to the judge to determine how much the company would pay, with attorneys representing the state asking for the maximum $5,000 penalty per violation.

The two-week trial in Santa Fe centered on accusations that Facebook deceived users about a data breach stemming from a third-party personality quiz that harvested data from roughly 87 million profiles and sold it to a political consulting firm, Cambridge Analytica, to generate targeted ads. The now-defunct firm's clients included the 2016 campaign for President Trump. 

Jurors sided with prosecutors, finding Facebook's failure to protect users' data impacted New Mexico's entire population of more than 2 million people. 

"For years, Facebook operated as if the rules that apply to everyone else didn't apply to them. Today, a jury of New Mexicans said otherwise," New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez said in a statement. "This is a historic verdict, not just for New Mexico, but for every state fighting to hold Big Tech accountable."

Jurors also found Facebook misled the public about investigations into data brokers following the Cambridge Analytica scandal, finding the company liable for over 2 million violations. 

During closing arguments, lawyers for Facebook claimed the state's evidence was outdated and that despite having five years to gather material, New Mexico failed to find more than one other instance of a data breach.

A Meta spokesperson told CBS News the company disagreed with the jury's verdict and will continue to defend "against efforts to distort our records." The company also noted that free speech issues "featured very prominently" in the case. 

"We have a First Amendment right to manage those platforms in a way we believe best serves the interests of our community," the spokesperson said. "This means prioritizing free speech, protecting our users' information and giving them control over their data." 

Meta agreed in August to pay up to $18 billion to settle the multistate lawsuit surrounding child safety issues. Buried in the 130-page settlement was an agreement to release Meta from future liability related to the Cambridge Analytica privacy breach, making New Mexico the only state to pursue a case. Florida was the only other state that did not sign the settlement, saying it was not tough enough on Meta.

Also this year, New Mexico won judgments totaling $942 million from Meta in a two-phase trial about the company's safety protections for minors. Furthermore, the court ordered Meta to implement new safeguards, including age-verification technology and time limits on its platforms. 

"Let this be a warning to every technology company doing business in our state," Torrez said Friday. "If you lie to New Mexicans about how you use their data, we will find out, and we will hold you accountable."

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com