近半数美国人现在对社会主义持正面看法
Almost Half Of Americans Now Hold Positive Views Of Socialism

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/almost-half-americans-now-hold-positive-views-socialism

在这篇文章中,乔纳森·特利(Jonathan Turley)指出,尽管社会主义历史上曾有过灾难性的失败,但它在美国,尤其是在年轻一代和民主党人中正经历着令人担忧的复苏。特利认为,现代支持者们通过兜售“共同利益”乌托邦的承诺,对社会主义理想进行了重新包装,从而有效地无视了历史教训。 通过将当下的社会主义运动与法国大革命时期的雅各宾派进行类比,特利警告称,这些运动试图瓦解美国的基本制度,并破坏个人的自决权。他将这些趋势与亚当·斯密在《国富论》中提出的原则进行了对比,斯密强调资本主义是实现个人自由和摆脱国家控制的工具。特利认为,对政府的依赖最终滋生的是奴役而非自由。 作者批评该运动是由知识分子和评论家而非工人阶级推动的潮流,并将社会主义当前受欢迎的现象视为一种脱离历史的愚行。文章最后引用了卡尔·马克思的话,特利暗示,如果说第一次激进的社会重构尝试是悲剧,那么当前的重复则可能演变成一场威胁美国共和体制稳定的危险闹剧。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Jonathan Turley via JonathanTurley.org,

Karl Marx believed that "Democracy is the road to socialism." Socialists seem to have found a generation of dupes to buy their ahistorical, fanciful pitch. A new poll shows 43% now have a positive view of socialism. An astonishing 65% of Democrats have a positive view. Socialism is now the rage on the left.

Like clothing styles, if you wait long enough, socialism tends to come back into style with generations with no memory of past failures. However, it is an astonishing trend in one of the most prosperous nations on Earth that outlasted a history cluttered with the broken failures of socialist and communist systems.

A new slick packaging of socialism has emerged with leaders such as Zohran Mamdani offering to teach people of the "warmth of collectivism." The Democratic Socialists of America are enticing voters with narratives like "Imagine the end of capitalism." Those words promise voters that there is a brave new world without landlords, debt, mandatory work hours, and "food, education, energy, medicine, and transportation... are common goods and utilities."

What is incredible is that many are buying this pitch.

It is also ironic that this is happening not just on the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence but also on the 250th anniversary of the publication of Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations.

As I write in Rage and the Republic:

"While he never visited the United States, his theories seemed quintessentially American to many of his generation. For a revolution that was triggered by tariffs and fueled by events like the Boston Tea Party, Smith's general principles read like an economic version of Common Sense. It was a type of declaration of independence not just from the British policy of mercantilism (emphasizing British exports over imports) but from economic controls over individual productivity and self-determination....

In summary, Smith was first and foremost viewed as a political theorist, and his economic theories were closely tied to his views on the natural liberties of humanity. He saw capitalism as a liberating system for individuals to allow them the wealth and resources to pursue their own chosen paths. Conversely, he saw government controls and subsidies as forms of control and potentially forms of suppression of the human will. If people are to be truly free, they must have the resources to pursue that freedom. The government dole can become a type of servitude or at least a subterfuge for citizens. If they are dependent on the government, they are never truly free."

The book compares many of these proposals to identical policies of the Jacobin movement in the French Revolution. Both the American and French revolutions arose during the same period, but one became the world's oldest democracy while the other became the blood-soaked "The Reign of Terror."

Notably, the Jacobins pushed for the same unicameral system that the socialists are now advocating as well as attacks on the wealthy.

The DSA is the direct descendant of the Jacobins in seeking to tear down moderating institutions and replace the president and justices with democratically elected figures by a Congress composed only of the House of Representatives.

As with the original Jacobins, those demanding these changes are not the working class but professors, pundits and young college-educated voters.

Pushing this analogy to a more menacing level, another poll shows that roughly 60 percent of Democrats now would support a military coup to remove President Donald Trump.

The return of socialism is like the reappearance of low-rise jeans. You are left mystified by anyone who believes that this is a worthy theory to emulate after consistent and catastrophic failures. Long forgotten is the disaster of the socialist government of François Mitterrand in France.

Most recently, Prime Minister Andy Burnham condemned the privatization policies of Margaret Thatcher: "The country surrendered control of the essentials - housing, water, energy, transport - and left people exposed to higher costs." What he does not mention is that she followed the collapse of socialist policies under Labour Prime Minister James Callaghan in 1977-78 during the so-called "winter of discontent," which I also discuss in the book.

Perhaps Marx was right after all: "History repeats itself, first as a tragedy, second as a farce."

Jonathan Turley is the best-selling author of "Rage and the Republic: The Unfinished Story of the American Revolution."

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com