TikTok 就“强制销售”或“禁令”法起诉美国政府
TikTok Sues US Government Over 'Forced-Sale' Or 'Ban' Law

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/tiktok-sues-us-government-over-forced-sale-or-ban-law

TikTok 及其中国所有者字节跳动已对美国旨在禁止这款流行社交媒体应用程序的新法律采取法律行动。 他们认为,这项法律侵犯了第一修正案规定的用户言论自由的宪法权利,因为 TikTok 为数百万美国人分享思想和交流提供了重要平台。 该诉讼通过一份冗长的请愿书发起,声称该立法迫使应用程序在 2025 年 1 月之前关闭,同时要求在 270 天的紧迫期限内出售或剥离其美国业务,这是不可能的。 核心问题包括因中国政府潜在的数据访问或宣传传播而对国家安全构成威胁。 法律学者警告说,遵守该命令可能会限制 TikTok 未来的内容,并可能侵犯用户受保护的自由。 TikTok 声称,考虑到其全球性,出售其美国业务是不可行的,无国界内容和国际视频交换是其吸引力的组成部分。 虽然一些人声称该应用程序构成国家安全风险,但根据 TikTok 的说法,这些说法似乎是推测性的,特别是考虑到使用该平台的高级政治人物。 该案可能会提交最高法院。

相关文章

原文

As was promised and expected, TikTok and its Chinese parent ByteDance have sued to challenge the new US law, arguing that the law is unconstitutional.

The New York Times reports, citing a petition the company provided, that the company alleges the new law violates users' First Amendment rights, by effectively removing an app that millions of Americans use to share their views and communicate freely.

“For the first time in history, Congress has enacted a law that subjects a single, named speech platform to a permanent, nationwide ban, and bars every American from participating in a unique online community with more than one billion people worldwide,” the company said in the 67-page petition it provided, which initiates the lawsuit.

“There is no question: The act will force a shutdown of TikTok by Jan. 19, 2025.”

The company also claims that a divestiture is “simply not possible” to complete within the law’s 270-day timeline.

As NYTimes reports, at the heart of the case will be lawmakers’ intent to defend the United States from what they and some security experts say is a national security threat because the Chinese government could lean on ByteDance to turn over sensitive TikTok user data or use the app to spread propaganda. Legal experts have said the mandate to sell or block the app could result in changes to TikTok’s content policies and shape what users are able to freely share on the platform, potentially violating their free speech rights.

TikTok argued in its suit that selling its U.S. operations was not “commercially, technologically, or legally feasible.”

A part of that argument hinges on how TikTok and its competitors are global in nature and content is accessible across country borders, with international videos as part of its appeal.

National security concerns about TikTok are “speculative” and fall short of what’s required to justify violating First Amendment rights, the company argued in its suit, adding that President Biden and other members of Congress’s use of the platform undermines claims that it’s a threat.

TikTok filed the suit in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit where the company asked the court to issue a declaratory judgment saying that the law violates the Constitution and to issue an order that would stop Attorney General Merrick B. Garland from enforcing it.

Several legal experts expect the case to land in front of the Supreme Court.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com