我们最小最高效的模型:Muse Ember
Muse Ember: Our smallest, most efficient model

原始链接: https://research.meta.ai/blog/muse-ember

Muse Ember 是 Meta 面向高并发、可重复的智能体与编程任务的模型。它提供 100 万 token 的上下文窗口、最多 512K 输出 token,以及对文本、图像、音频和视频的原生多模态理解,包括基于截图的计算机使用。它可端到端承载业务工作流,并设计为与 Muse Wonder 配合处理更难的问题。 在最大推理设置下,它在多项基准测试中领先,包括 AutomationBench-AA、Agents’ Last Exam、Personal Superintelligence Index、Terminal-Bench 4.0、Coding Agent Index-AA、OSWorld 2.1 和 PerceptionBench,而 Claude Haiku 5.5 领先 FrontierCode 2.0-AA。它是首个使用 Muse Wonder Full 训练的模型,并与 Muse Wonder 和 Muse Spark 一起完善 Meta 的产品组合。 基于 Meta Superintelligence Scaling Framework 的安全评估显示,它低于高风险阈值。它现已作为 muse-ember-1.0 通过 Muse Code 和 Meta Model API 提供,定价为输入 token 每百万 $0.10、缓存输入 token 每百万 $0.004、输出 token 每百万 $0.50。Meta 将其定位为可负担、可扩展的个人超级智能。

Meta 通过 Hacker News 帖子发布了 Muse Ember,这是其最小且最高效的模型。评论者讨论了其低廉定价(每百万输入 token 0.10 美元,每百万输出 token 0.50 美元)、六个推理努力级别以及基准测试声明,包括在远低于部分竞争对手的成本下取得的强劲非编码及金融/法律成绩。Simon Willison 跨推理级别测试了鹈鹕 SVG,发现推理并未明显提升质量,而评论者就构图、收敛和基准刷分展开了辩论。许多人对 Ember 非开放权重表示失望,将其与 Meta 早期的开放发布进行对比并希望本地使用。其他人批评可能的"benchmaxxing",质疑微小廉价模型对实际工作的用处,并将 Ember 与 Haiku、Luna、Terra 和 DeepSeek 进行比较。一些人强调成本效益;另一些人指出缺少批量定价、拒绝回答或 Meta 的信任问题。总体而言,Ember 定位为低成本通用小型模型,但社区对其实际价值的评价褒贬不一。
相关文章

原文

Agents

Agents spend most of their tokens on many small, structured steps, and Muse Ember is built for exactly that. It can carry a business workflow end to end, pulling records, calling tools in sequence, and updating systems across apps.

With a 1M-token context window and up to 512K output tokens, it can take in a full codebase or document set in a single call.

AutomationBench-AA

Artificial Analysis | November 9, 2026. Strict pass@1.

Agents' Last Exam

Meta internal evaluation. Linux subset.

Personal Superintelligence Index

Internal composite index of personal and knowledge work.

Coding

Muse Ember is built for the coding subtasks an agent sends off hundreds of times a session: reading files, running tests, making targeted fixes.

Terminal-Bench 4.0

Each model in its best published harness. See footnote 1.

Coding Agent Index-AA

Artificial Analysis | November 9, 2026

FrontierCode 2.0-AA

Artificial Analysis | November 9, 2026

For the hardest problems, pair it with Muse Wonder: Muse Wonder plans, Muse Ember handles the volume.

Multimodal

Muse Ember natively understands text, images, audio, and video, so agents can read screenshots, charts, and scanned documents, or work from voice memos, meeting recordings, and video without a separate model. It can work through long real-world documents, operate a computer directly from screenshots, and pick out fine visual detail.

GDP.pdf-AA

Artificial Analysis | November 9, 2026

OSWorld 2.1

Meta internal evaluation. Partial-credit reward.

PerceptionBench

Meta internal evaluation. With tools.

Safety

Before release, we evaluated Muse Ember under our Meta Superintelligence Scaling Framework, including chemical and biological, cybersecurity, and loss-of-control risks. Across the categories assessed, our evaluations found that Muse Ember remained below the framework’s high-risk thresholds. Though it’s a small model, it received the same core safety training and testing. We also evaluated how Muse Ember behaves when acting on users' behalf. That covers whether it respects user intent, handles sensitive information appropriately, resists instructions hidden in web pages, documents, or tool outputs that try to redirect it, and seeks human input before high-impact actions.

Availability

Muse Ember is available today on Muse Code and Meta Model API as muse-ember-1.0. It costs $0.10 per million input tokens, $0.004 per million cached input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens, with a 1M-token context window and up to 512K output tokens. Muse Ember supports the Responses API.

When we introduced Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full, we said we would use them to develop specialized models we can bring to everyone. Muse Ember is the first trained using Muse Wonder Full. It rounds out our portfolio of models: Muse Wonder for the hardest problems, Muse Spark for coding and agentic workflows, and Muse Ember for repeatable coding and agentic tasks at scale at about $0.14 per Artificial Analysis task, a cost low enough to run in every product, for everyone.

Muse Ember and Muse Spark 1.3 comparison

Our goal is personal superintelligence: models that help you pursue your goals, create what you imagine, deepen your relationships, and take action on what you value most. Bringing it to everyone takes more than frontier capability. It takes frontier capability at a price that scales. We have even more efficient models in training and look forward to sharing what's next.

Try Muse Ember today
联系我们 contact @ memedata.com