Claude Fable 5.2 在 Artificial Analysis 上得 65 分,目前最高。
Claude Fable 5.2 scores 65 on Artificial Analysis, highest so far

原始链接: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/claude-fable-5-2

Claude Fable 5.2(Max,默认回退)高度智能,但成本高、速度慢、输出冗长。它支持文本和图像输入,输出文本,上下文为100万token。在Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index中得65分,中位数为40;生成2.75亿token,中位数为7280万。定价为每100万输入token 8美元,每100万输出token 40美元,平均每任务26.54美元。每任务耗时45分钟,中位数为12.9分钟。总体而言,它性能强,但成本更高、速度更慢、输出量更大。

Claude Fable 5.2 以 65 分登顶 Artificial Analysis,但评论者关注其最高推理时的高昂成本,输出 token 远多于 Fable 5.1。在较低努力级别下,它更便宜、更快且仍得分很高,因此一些人认为它在帕累托最优意义上是 Opus 5.5 的显著改进。其他人质疑智能提升是否值得成本,理由包括收益递减、基准测试刷分,以及订阅或 DeepSeek 等更便宜模型的更好性价比。讨论还涵盖 Claude、OpenAI 和 Google 模型之间的比较;编程与非编程任务;模型拒答与安全行为;以及昂贵的前沿模型是否主要用于小众高价值任务。总体而言,反应褒贬不一:对能力提升感到兴奋,对成本与实际用途持怀疑态度。
相关文章

原文

Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) is amongst the leading models in intelligence, but particularly expensive when comparing to other models of similar price. It's also notably slow per task and very verbose. The model supports text and image input, outputs text, and has a 1M tokens context window.

Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 65 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it well above average among comparable models (median: 40). When evaluating the Intelligence Index, it generated 275M tokens, which is very verbose in comparison to the median of 72.8M.

Pricing for Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) is $8.00 per 1M input tokens (expensive, median: $2.00) and $40.00 per 1M output tokens (expensive, median: $10.00). On average, it costs $26.54 per task to evaluate Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) on the Intelligence Index.

At 45.0 minutes per Intelligence Index task, Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) is notably slow compared with the median of 12.9 minutes for comparable models (lower is better).

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com