(评论)
(comments)

原始链接: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40683210

我不确定我是否同意这个决定。那篇文章在首页上出现了大约一个小时,然后就被遗忘了,可能是因为火焰战争探测器(评论多于点赞)。 这个对很多人来说非常有趣,并且在首页顶部停留了很长一段时间,并且很可能会一直留在那里,除非干预。我同意,当有足够的讨论机会时,欺骗是一个问题,但是当 先前提交的内容被火焰探测器击落或因运气不好而被标记为死亡,似乎让第二次提交有自然生存的机会是唯一公平的。在这一点上,先前提交的内容可以说是骗局,这是规范的 提交。

相关文章

原文
I'm not sure that I agree with this decision.

That post was on the front page for about an hour and then sank into oblivion, probably because of the flame war detector (more comments than upvotes). This one was very interesting to a lot of people and stayed at the top of the front page for quite a while and likely would have stayed there barring intervention.

I agree that dupes are a problem when there was ample opportunity for discussion, but when the previous submission gets downed by the flame detector or gets flagged to death by bad luck it seems like it's only fair to let the second submission stand a chance at natural survival.

At this point, the previous submission is arguably the dupe and this is the canonical submission.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com