![]() |
|
![]() |
| > It might be a bit tasteless to be quoting ones own master's thesis
Eh, its something you poured a fairly significant portion of your life into? You best brag about it whenever you get the chance :P |
![]() |
| > "First and foremost, I’d like to thank the nameless stranger that is responsible for enforcing the deadline…
“I work best under pressure. In fact, I work only under pressure…” |
![]() |
| For those like myself wondering how a regular wave could do this, the article says it was something colloquially termed a "sneaker wave." Like a rogue wave, but on the shoreline. It also sounds like they all got hit by the wave, and only Charity survived.
Edit: National Weather article on Sneaker Waves: https://www.weather.gov/safety/sneaker-waves Apparently the cold water and other complications make things worse. |
![]() |
| Would you mind sharing that fragment?
I'm a 53 year old en_GB speaker and writer and long term owner of a copy of "Usage and abusage: A Guide to Good English" and long ago decided to boot the bloody thing into the long grass. You and I (and every other interaction involving English) decide how English is spoken or written. At least Partridge uses the term "guide" for his treatise. There is no such thing as a pure English, finely polished and honed to a razor edge and delivered with equanimity. I think the best we can all hope for is to be mutually understood. Given all that, I don't think I've ever heard of a "sentence fragment". It sounds like a grammar sin, probably funded by the lower circles of hell. I attended several very posh schools in the UK as well as the standard education system hereabouts and I don't recall that term being used. Perhaps I was asleep at the time. I've done a quick search and this is dreadfully fluffy: https://www.grammarly.com/blog/mistake-of-the-month-sentence... I'd love to hear what "sentence fragment" really means: to whom and why. |
![]() |
| There's also the funding acknowledgement in the YOLO v3 tech report (https://pjreddie.com/media/files/papers/YOLOv3.pdf):
> But maybe a better question is: “What are we going to do with these detectors now that we have them?” A lot of the people doing this research are at Google and Facebook. I guess at least we know the technology is in good hands and definitely won’t be used to harvest your personal information and sell it to.... wait, you’re saying that’s exactly what it will be used for?? Oh. > Well the other people heavily funding vision research are the military and they’ve never done anything horrible like killing lots of people with new technology oh wait....[1] > [1] The author is funded by the Office of Naval Research and Google. |
![]() |
| Not to take away from these legit ones, but it surprises me that some of the recent plagiarism cases included people who plagiarized their acknowledgements. Like really? |
It begins with
> "First and foremost, I’d like to thank the nameless stranger that is responsible for enforcing the deadline for the submission of this thesis; but for their unwavering absolutism this thesis would exist in a perpetual state of being nearly done. The rest follows in no particular order"
And ends with
> "Finally, this thesis is dedicated to the memory of the two laptops that gave up their magic smoke in the name of science and this thesis. To my Dell Studio 1555 and Asus Zenbook UXA1:
> Do not go gentle into that goodnight
> Rage, rage against the dying of the backlight"
https://jszym.com/attachments/about/thesis.pdf