法庭裁决:没有证据显示乔治亚州的投票法针对黑人选民进行歧视。
Court Rules No Evidence Georgia's Voting Law Discriminates Against Black Voters

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/court-rules-no-evidence-georgias-voting-law-discriminates-against-black-voters

在2021年8月,几个左倾组织对乔治亚州共和党主导政府通过的新投票立法提起了诉讼,声称非洲裔美国人的平等投票权受到剥夺,原因是更改可能导致缺席选票的投票减少,减少访问度高的投放箱数量,以及限制在投票站附近的食品和饮料分发。根据美国地区法官J.P. Boulee在2022年10月6日的判决,他决定这些挑战并不构成针对黑人公民的故意歧视证据。尽管原告认为法案中某些条款旨在解决选举中的长队问题,但这可能会对国内某些有大量非裔美国人的地区产生不利影响,但司法部和私人申诉人都没有能够证明任何实质性的胜利可能性,因为他们没有找到任何关于白人和非白人公民之间不公平影响的相关实证数据。总的来说,法官在评估之前拒绝阻止实施拟议法规,因为原告未能证明他们的假设,包括缺乏适当身份证明文件的个人在申请缺席选票时面临与高加索人不同的困难。在布凯利法官的决定之后,双方代表表达了不同意见关于其适当性;州长布莱恩·肯普表示满意并重申他对规定的信心,即该规定将增加选举透明度,同时提高公民参与度,而代表挑战者的发言人则表示他们将继续在国家范围内推动民主改革,引用与全国范围内的被剥夺选民相关的担忧。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

A federal judge in Georgia has declined to block several provisions of a sweeping election law while multiple legal challenges play out.

An election worker scans mail-in ballots in a file photo. (Ethan Miller/Getty Images)

Several left-wing advocacy and civil rights groups, as well as the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ, sued in 2021 after Republican state lawmakers passed the measure amid claims about election fraud in the state in 2020. Those lawsuits claim that black voters are now denied equal access to voting, which violates the Voting Rights Act.

Plaintiffs have not shown, at least at this stage of the proceedings, that any of the provisions have a disparate impact on black voters,” U.S. District Judge J.P. Boulee wrote in an order issued Wednesday. The jurist also wrote that the court “cannot find that Plaintiffs have presented enough evidence to show that the Legislature foresaw or knew that S.B. 202 would have a disparate impact on minority voters.”

The Biden administration and the Democrat-affiliated groups also “failed to show a substantial likelihood of success on the merits as to their claims that the provisions” of the election law "intentionally discriminate against black voters in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, Fifteenth Amendment and Section 2 of the [Voting Rights Act]," the judge ruled.

The plaintiffs, in their lawsuit, sought to prevent the law's enforcement pertaining to drop boxes as well as the distribution of food, water, and other gifts to voters who are waiting at polling locations. The law also set a deadline to submit applications for absentee ballots, among other measures.

Another section of the law says that provisional ballots cast at the wrong precinct cannot be counted if they are case prior to 5 p.m. on Election Day. The final provision requires that a voter provide their driver’s license or state identification card number when requesting an absentee ballot.

In response, the plaintiffs said they were disappointed in Judge Boulee's decision, with reports suggesting that the challenged provisions will remain intact during the 2024 election cycle. Georgia was a key battleground state during the 2020 election and during the January 2021 runoff election for two U.S. Senate seats.

“The fight for voting rights in the South has never been easy, especially for Black voters. We will never stop advocating on behalf of our clients and voters across the state. We look forward to presenting our case at trial,” Rahul Garabadu, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union of Georgia, said in a statement.

And Alaizah Koorji, assistant counsel at the Legal Defense Fund, one of the plaintiffs, claimed that the law will continue to present barriers to black voters, alleging they are "designed to dilute Black political power."

The judge, however, said that the differences that were shown by the civil rights groups' lawyers in the election case were not "statistically significant enough to demonstrate that black voters wait in longer lines at a meaningfully higher rate than white voters."

In rejecting the claims that absentee ballots violate the Voting Rights Act, the judge wrote, "Without more, generalized evidence regarding the use of absentee voting is not sufficient to show that this particular provision, pertaining to one aspect of absentee voting, is discriminatory."

He added that the plaintiffs also didn't provide evidence suggesting that registered black voters could not obtain a state-issued identification card or driver's license at a higher rate than white voters.

Some Democratic lawmakers, the judge wrote, were also in favor of several of the law's provisions that required more election workers and equipment to be made available if a line occurs at a polling location on Election day. During the 2020 election, there were reports of lengthy lines at a number of precincts across Georgia, pushing the time back beyond the closing time to vote in-person.

On Thursday, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger hailed the judge's ruling in a news release, saying that "the court confirmed what we’ve been saying all along." The release added that the law “strengthens election integrity while increasing the opportunity for Georgia voters to cast a ballot.”

The Republican-controlled Legislature in Georgia passed the law in March 2021 before it was signed by Gov. Brian Kemp, a Republican, weeks later.

The bill and law drew a wave of corporate backlash, which included Georgia-based firms like Coca-Cola and Delta Air Lines. For example, Delta's CEO, Ed Bastian, claimed at the time that the law is "unacceptable" and "based on a lie," drawing backlash from Mr. Kemp and other Republicans.

“Mr. Bastian should compare voting laws in Georgia—which include no-excuse absentee balloting, online voter registration, 17 days of early voting with an additional two optional Sundays, and automatic voter registration when obtaining a driver’s license—with other states Delta Airlines operates in,” Mr. Kemp told CNBC more than two years ago.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com