法官裁定纽森的新加州 Deepfake 禁令违宪
Judge Finds Newsom's New California Deepfake Ban Unconstitutional

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/judge-finds-newsoms-new-california-deepfake-ban-unconstitutional

一名联邦法官裁定加利福尼亚州一项禁止与选举相关的深度造假的法律 (AB 2839) 无效。 该法律被认为违宪,违反了第一修正案对言论自由的保护。 该案件涉及由克里斯托弗·科尔斯(“里根先生”)制作的副总统卡玛拉·哈里斯的人工智能讽刺视频。 门德斯法官认为该法律过于宽泛,可能会抑制幽默并阻碍自由交流思想。 他同意科尔斯的视频是讽刺作品,受到第一修正案的保护。 分享这段视频的特斯拉首席执行官埃隆·马斯克称赞这一裁决是一次胜利。 该决定凸显了深度造假和其他人工智能相关技术带来的复杂法律挑战。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Brayden Lindrea via CoinTelegraph.com,

A federal court judge issued a preliminary injunction against a two-week-old California law that effectively bans election-related deepfakes.

The law — AB 2839 — allowed any person to sue for damages over AI deepfakes within 120 days of an election and up to 60 days after if the perpetrator’s post resembled a political candidate. 

Judge John A. Mendez said artificial intelligence and deepfakes pose significant risks but ruled that the law was “unconstitutional” as it likely violated the First Amendment.

“The Court finds that AB 2839 is also unconstitutional under California’s free speech provision.” 

The decision comes from a case involving Christopher Kohls, known as “Mr Reagan” on X. Kohls created a controversial AI-altered campaign video in July mocking United States Vice President Kamala Harris that was later shared by X’s executive chairman Elon Musk.

A lawyer representing Kohls filed a lawsuit against California Attorney General Rob Bonta and Secretary of State Shirley N. Weber to block the new law a day after California Governor Gavin Newsom signed it into law on Sept. 17. 

The law allowed California judges to order distributors of AI deepfakes to take them down or potentially face monetary penalties.

Mendez said Kohls is “likely to succeed on his state constitutional claim” and granted the motion for a preliminary injunction on Oct. 2.

“Most of AB 2839 acts as a hammer instead of a scalpel, serving as a blunt tool that hinders humorous expression and unconstitutionally stifles the free and unfettered exchange of ideas which is so vital to American democratic debate.” 

Excerpt from Judge John A. Mendez’s decision in the Kohls case. Source: Election Law Blog

Mendez further agreed with Kohls’ lawyer that the AI deepfake of Harris was merely “satire” that should be protected by the First Amendment.

“While a well-founded fear of a digitally manipulated media landscape may be justified, this fear does not give legislators unbridled license to bulldoze over the longstanding tradition of critique, parody, and satire protected by the First Amendment.”

Tesla CEO Elon Musk viewed the court ruling as a win.

Source: Elon Musk

AB 2839 is one of several new AI-related laws that has recently hit Newsom’s desk.

Newsom on Sept. 30 vetoed the Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act — SB 1047 — which proposed mandatory safety testing of AI models.

Newsom said that “while well-intentioned,” SB 1047 could place unnecessary restrictions on emerging AI companies in California.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com