1886 年,美国委托绘制每种已知水果的水彩画(2019)
In 1886, the US commissioned watercolor paintings of every known fruit (2019)

原始链接: https://www.openculture.com/2019/06/the-us-government-commissioned-7500-watercolor-paintings.html

没有提供任何文章来继续阅读这篇文章。 似乎给定的文本仅提供有关开放文化及其创始人 Dan Colman 的信息,但不包含可供继续阅读的文章。 也许,可能有一个超链接或对之前提到的文章的引用,以供关注并继续阅读。 然而,如果没有这样的上下文,就不能假设这里存在另一篇文章用于延续目的。

是的,我应该澄清一下,300,000 美元的数字来自于之前推测资金来源的评论。 事实上,与创建和维护在线画廊相关的绝大多数费用都是由 Ceres Trust 的赠款支付的。 However, I suspect the initial investment played a key role in enabling the gallery as well. 至于重点是记录保存而不是潜在利润,根据史密森尼网站上的这段文字,这似乎是标准操作程序: https://digital.si.edu/about/mission 从本质上讲,任何直接从文化遗产项目中获利的尝试似乎都违反了指导全世界档案和保护实践的主要原则之一,特别是关于委托档案馆的材料。 历史证明,保护内容和促进访问的便利性已被证明可以有效地吸引更广泛的受众并提高遗产材料的价值,从而有可能导致公众认知和受欢迎程度的提高,从而通过增加流量或更广泛的媒体形式的吸引力来获得间接的经济收益。 然而,在参与文化遗产文献记录活动时,这些次要影响不应被视为主要目标,也不应与直接投资回报策略混为一谈。
相关文章

原文

T.S. Eliot asks in the opening stanzas of his Choruses from the Rock, “where is the knowledge we have lost in information?” The passage has been called a pointed question for our time, in which we seem to have lost the ability to learn, to make meaningful connections and contextualize events. They fly by us at superhuman speeds; credible sources are buried between spurious links. Truth and falsehood blur beyond distinction.

But there is another feature of the 21st century too-often unremarked upon, one only made possible by the rapid spread of information technology. Vast digital archives of primary sources open up to ordinary users, archives once only available to historians, promising the possibility, at least, of a far more egalitarian spread of both information and knowledge.

Those archives include the USDA Pomological Watercolor Collection, “over 7,500 paintings, drawings, and wax models commissioned by the USDA between 1886 and 1942,” notes Chloe Olewitz at Morsel. The word “pomology,” “the science and practice of growing fruit,” first appeared in 1818, and the degree to which people depended on fruit trees and fruit stores made it a distinctively popular science, as was so much agriculture at the time.

But pomology was growing from a domestic science into an industrial one, adopted by “farmers across the United States,” writes Olewitz, who “worked with the USDA to set up orchards to serve emerging markets” as “the country’s most prolific fruit-producing regions began to take shape.” Central to the government agency’s growing pomological agenda was the recording of all the various types of fruit being cultivated, hybridized, inspected, and sold from both inside the U.S. and all over the world.

Prior to and even long after photography could do the job, that meant employing the talents of around 65 American artists to “document the thousands and thousands of varieties of heirloom and experimental fruit cultivars sprouting up nationwide.” The USDA made the full collection public after Electronic Frontier Foundation activist Parker Higgins submitted a Freedom of Information Act request in 2015.

Higgins saw the project as an example of “the way free speech issues intersect with questions of copyright and public domain,” as he put it. Historical government-issued fruit watercolors might not seem like the obvious place to start, but they’re as good a place as any. He stumbled on the collection while either randomly collecting information or acquiring knowledge, depending on how you look at it, “challenging himself to discover one new cool public domain thing every day for a month.”

It turned out that access to the USDA images was limited, “with high resolution versions hidden behind a largely untouched paywall.” After investing $300,000, they had made $600 in fees in five years, a losing proposition that would better serve the public, the scholarly community, and those working in-between if it became freely available.

You can explore the entirety of this tantalizing collection of fruit watercolors, ranging in quality from the workmanlike to the near sublime, and from unsung artists like James Marion Shull, who sketched the Cuban pineapple above, Ellen Isham Schutt, who brings us the Aegle marmelos, commonly called “bael” in India, further up, and Deborah Griscom Passmore, whose 1899 Malus domesticus, at the top, describes a U.S. pomological archetype.

It’s easy to see how Higgins could become engrossed in this collection. Its utilitarian purpose belies its simple beauty, and with 3,800 images of apples alone, one could get lost taking in the visual nuances—according to some very prolific naturalist artists—of just one fruit alone. Higgins, of course, created a Twitter bot to send out random images from the archive, an interesting distraction and also, for people inclined to seek it out, a lure to the full USDA Pomological Watercolor Collection.

At what point does an exploration of these images tip from information into knowledge? It’s hard to say, but it’s unlikely we would pursue either one if that pursuit didn’t also include its share of pleasure. Enter the USDA’s Pomological Watercolor Collection here to new and download over 7,500 high-resolution digital images like those above.

via Morsel.

Related Content:

New Archive Digitizes 80,000 Historic Watercolor Paintings, the Medium Through Which We Documented the World Before Photography

Two Million Wondrous Nature Illustrations Put Online by The Biodiversity Heritage Library

Ernst Haeckel’s Sublime Drawings of Flora and Fauna: The Beautiful Scientific Drawings That Influenced Europe’s Art Nouveau Movement (1889)

Josh Jones is a writer and musician based in Durham, NC. Follow him at @jdmagness


联系我们 contact @ memedata.com