The once-lucrative European auto market is an utter disaster after numerous brands, including Volkswagen, Mercedes, Aston Martin, BMW, and Stellantis, have warned about a downturn and EV programs hemorrhaging cash while China eats their lunch with cheap EVs. 

Providing more insight into the downturn, Autoblog's Stephen Fogel penned a note with commentary on each auto brand and his thoughts on whether they will survive the 'EV Apocaplyse.' 

"The path to electrification is a very difficult one, for both legacy automakers and EV startups. The recent plateauing of EV demand has put additional pressure on manufacturers that have gone all in on EVs. For those that haven't, it may be too late," Fogel said. 

He noted, "Projecting into the future, companies that don't yet have EVs consumers want to buy are unlikely to make it." 

Here's the list: 

• Tesla, the most successful EV startup, has the benefit of a decade-plus head start, which they have used to leapfrog their legacy competition, unburdened by the traditional way of doing things. With an international production base, advanced software-based electronic architecture, and direct-to-consumer sales, Tesla has blazed its own trail and generated the production volume needed to succeed.

• Ford: While the Mustang Mach-e is a credible product, F-150 Lightning production will soon be shut down until next year. Its three-row SUV has been postponed and Ford's "skunkworks" low-cost EV has not yet been revealed. It doesn't look good for Ford.

• Lincoln: There are zero Lincoln EVs at this point.

• Chrysler: With a single hybrid minivan and nothing else in the lineup, Chrysler's going nowhere fast.

• Dodge: How many Charger EVs will be sold to those who love the ICE versions, at $61K and up? Are there any other Dodge EVs coming?

• Ram: The Ram 1500 REV may solve truck owners' range and towing issues, but at an estimated $58,000-$85,000, will it be embraced by the average truck buyer?

• Alfa Romeo & Fiat: They couldn't make it here as ICE brands, how will EVs help?

• Maserati: Sales are way down and the boss just got fired. Maser's got big problems that EVs won't solve (yes, there is the Folgore).

• Toyota: Regardless of its leadership in hybrids, the company has yet to produce a desirable EV. Can they get their act together in time?

• Lexus: Where's this brand's luxury EV leadership? A rebadged Busy Forks doesn't count.

• Nissan: They blew their lead after the Leaf came out, and the Ariya is far from compelling.

• Infiniti: No EVs. Sales are down significantly the past three quarters. Who's even shopping them?

• Mazda: The MX-30 was a compliance car. Where is the Mazda EV that's as good as their ICE vehicles?

• Subaru: It will take more than a so-so Toyota-based EV to appeal to Subaru's fans.

• Jaguar: Their plan to become an EV-only, low-production, high-end brand is extremely risky.

• Land Rover: Nothing yet. Will parent Tata put up the cash to fund LR's EV transition?

• Mercedes-Benz: Benz' EV sales recently dropped 30%, thanks to Chinese competition and high production costs in Germany. The current approach isn't working.

• Volkswagen: VW has yet to build any desirable, reasonably-priced EVs, which may ultimately be developed in China after their German plants close down. Not looking good.

• Audi: As goes VW, so goes Audi. Just announced closing of its EV plant in Belgium.

• Porsche: They are going all in with EV Macan, Boxster, and Cayman. Will enthusiasts bite? Will Chinese Hyper-EVs undercut them on price?

• Vinfast: Could any EV brand have had a worse start in the US market?

• Rivian: Hoping to reach 57,000 R1 sales this year. If they run out of cash before they get their smaller, higher-volume vehicles out, they're finished.

• Lucid: Has yet to break the 10,000 vehicles per year mark. If the Saudis tire of pumping money in, and volumes remain low, they won't last long.

• Polestar: Delivered a total of 32,300 cars worldwide in the first three quarters of 2024. Why are they separate from Volvo and how does this help?

In the US, President-elect Donald Trump's historic victory over Vice President Kamala Harris will likely result in a new policy shift that will reduce or eliminate vehicle emissions standards under the Environmental Protection Agency.

The administration change could give legacy automakers focusing on petrol-powered vehicles a much longer operating time instead of pushing companies like Ford and GM into 'all-electric futures' by the mid-2030s. 

Tesla's Elon Musk noted in July: "Take away the subsidies. It will only help Tesla. Also, remove subsidies from all industries!"

Does Tesla come out as the winner?