彼得·希夫:特朗普的下一步是什么? Peter Schiff: What's Next For Trump?

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/precious-metals/peter-schiff-whats-next-trump

彼得·希夫在他的最新节目中分析了特朗普的选举胜利及其对美国经济的影响。 他将特朗普的胜利归因于经济状况不佳,并认为他的政策将进一步压低长期利率。 希夫警告说,除非取消补贴和救助,否则金融部门放松管制可能会加剧问题。 虽然共和党有权进行联邦改革,但希夫质疑他们是否会做出有意义的改变。 他预计,特朗普第二任期内的减税将给利率带来压力,并迫使美联储实施量化宽松。 最糟糕的情况是一场金融危机,这场危机将归咎于特朗普,并导致美国政治进一步左倾。 希夫建议逐步回归金本位作为解决经济困境的办法。

In his latest show, Peter Schiff analyzes Trump's election victory and its implications for the US economy. He attributes Trump's win to the poor state of the economy and believes his policies will further strain long-term interest rates. Schiff warns that deregulation in the financial sector could exacerbate problems unless subsidies and bailouts are eliminated. While the GOP has a mandate for federal reform, Schiff questions whether they will make meaningful changes. He predicts that tax cuts under Trump's second term will pressure interest rates and force the Fed to implement QE. The worst-case scenario is a financial crisis that would be blamed on Trump and lead to a further shift to the left in US politics. Schiff suggests a gradual return to the gold standard as a solution to economic woes.


Peter Schiff: What's Next For Trump?

Via SchiffGold.com,

In the latest episode of the Peter Schiff Show, Peter dissects Donald Trump’s dominant election victory and spends most of the show evaluating America’s economic prospects under his second term. He also hits on Bitcoin’s recent price surge and announces a new lawsuit launched against the IRS and other parties responsible for the closing of Peter’s bank in Puerto Rico. 

Peter starts the episode by pointing out the obvious reason Trump won. Despite what the media and political class insists, it’s not bigotry or hatred:

“I want to remind my audience why he won and why I was so confident for so long that he was going to win. He won because the economy is lousy. That’s why he won the first time in 2016. That’s why I predicted he was going to win in 2016, because back in 2015, the media was selling the same BS—mainstream media, Wall Street—that we had a great economy. … Donald Trump was basically saying the same thing that I was. It was almost like he was watching my podcast and then going out and stomping on the campaign trail, talking about how the economy was actually bad, how the numbers were a fraud.” 

The state of the economy explains why Trump was able to assemble a coalition unlike any other in recent Republican history:

“He got 20% of the African American vote. I mean, it dwarfs what he got the first time—I think he got 88% white support and maybe 12% African American. Twenty percent! That’s the biggest percentage of the African American vote that Republicans have had in, I don’t know, 20 years...

The guy’s supposed to be a racist, and he’s getting more African American support than other Republicans who supposedly were racist. Why did he get all these African American votes? Because they’re suffering in this economy.”

Much of the Trump campaign’s rhetoric on deregulation is solid. Peter, however, urges caution on deregulating the financial sector. Unless banking subsidies and bailouts are taken off the table, further deregulation will just reward banks for bad fiscal behavior:

“In banking, it’s almost not really two wrongs make a right, but two wrongs make a lesser wrong. So once you make the mistake of providing all these subsidies and government guarantees to banks, then the government needs to step up and regulate them because you’ve now eliminated the free market regulation. So now what they’re going to do is deregulate the banks so they can take even bigger risks with taxpayer money.”

The GOP has a strong mandate to reform the federal government, and they should. But it’s unlikely they’ll actually make meaningful change:

Politicians have been promising for years to cut waste, fraud, and abuse. They never do it. Yes, when Elon Musk bought Twitter, he made major cuts. He had the kitchen sink, and he got rid of a lot of dead wood. That’s because he owned the company. He could do what he wants. He’s not going to be able to do that with the government. The real spending cuts are going to have to get approved by Congress.”

Any more Trump tax cuts will put pressure on already rising long-term rates and likely induce the Fed to return to QE:

The Fed is going to have to go back to QE, which is what I’ve been saying they’re going to do. The only way to stop long-term interest rates from soaring and crushing the economy, the stock market, the banks, and everything Trump is promising to pump up, is if the Fed goes back to quantitative easing to monetize the massive budget deficits that the tax cuts produce—at least in the short run.”

The worst case for Trump’s second term is a major financial crisis. If the economy blows up in the next four years, Trump will be blamed, and the left will benefit:

If everything collapses right away, you know, see what Trump did, and they’re going to tie Trump to capitalism, free markets, deregulation, less government. So they’re going to really hang this collapse on free-market capitalism and Trump. And if you thought Kamala was left-wing, wait till you see who we elect in four years, you know, because of this collapse.”

One way to ameliorate America’s economic problems would be to slowly return to the gold standard. One former Trump administration advisor has recently issued such a plan.

Tyler Durden Mon, 11/11/2024 - 12:30
相关文章
联系我们 contact @ memedata.com