耶鲁大学精神病学家:哈里斯选民可能需要与朋友和家人断绝联系 Yale Psychiatrist: Harris Voters May Need To Cut Off Friends & Family Members

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/yale-psychiatrist-harris-voters-may-need-cut-friends-family-members

选举结束后,耶鲁大学阿曼达·卡尔霍恩博士建议人们切断与支持不同政治观点的家人和朋友的联系。 她认为,与反对意见互动可能会“触发”心理健康。 然而,作者乔纳森·特利 (Jonathan Turley) 认为,这种做法会孤立人们,并使愤怒成瘾长期存在。 他强调进行相互尊重的讨论来解决这些问题的重要性。 耶鲁大学就是这种孤立的例证,其教师主要是民主党人,缺乏共和党代表。 这就形成了一个“回音室”,进一步将不同观点的个体分开。 特利认为,将自己与反对意见隔离开来不利于心理健康和国家福祉。 他建议,在政治孤岛之外进行深思熟虑的讨论可以带来更健康的理解和减少分裂的社会。

Following the election, Yale's Dr. Amanda Calhoun advises people to cut off contact with family and friends who support different political views. She suggests that interacting with opposing opinions could be "triggering" for mental health. However, the author, Jonathan Turley, believes that this approach isolates people and perpetuates rage addiction. He emphasizes the importance of engaging in respectful discussions to resolve these issues. Yale University exemplifies this isolation, with a predominantly Democratic faculty and a lack of Republican representation. This creates an "echo chamber" that further separates individuals with different views. Turley argues that isolating oneself from opposing opinions is detrimental to mental health and the nation's well-being. He suggests that engaging in thoughtful discussions outside of political silos can lead to a healthier understanding and a less divided society.


Yale Psychiatrist: Harris Voters May Need To Cut Off Friends & Family Members

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

With women pledging to break up with their boyfriends and divorce their husbands over the Trump victory, Yale University chief psychiatry resident Dr. Amanda Calhoun is advising that it may also be necessary for your mental health to cut off your family and friends who supported Trump. In that way, you can avoid being “triggered” by opposing political views — much like Yale itself.

As academics, we are dealing with the election on campuses across America. After the election, I had some valuable discussions with students who supported Harris and some who supported Trump. I wish there would be more interaction between the two groups. That is why this story stood out for me. I do not believe that further separation or isolation will help this country or these individuals.

Dr. Calhoun went on MSNBC’s Joy Reid to offer the curious take on good mental health.

Reid has spent the week condemning the majority of voters (particularly minority voters) in the nation as racists and misogynists for the Trump victory.

Reid joined a rising tide of rage, which I discussed in my column this weekend.

Reid asked “how do you interact with people who you know voted for this?"

“If you are an LGBTQ person and you know someone in your family voted essentially against your rights or you’re a woman,” Reid continued:

“do you recommend, just from a psychological standpoint, being around them? We got the holidays coming up.”

Calhoun responded, “So I love that you asked this question because there is a push, I think, just a societal norm that if somebody is your family, that they are entitled to your time.”

“And I think the answer is absolutely not,” she declared.

Dr. Calhoun then contributed more to the madness.

“So, if you are going into a situation where you have family members, where you have close friends who you know have voted in ways that are against you… it’s completely fine to not be around those people and to tell them why…

…You know, to say, ‘I have a problem with the way that you voted because it went against my very livelihood, and I’m not going to be around you this holiday. I need to take some space for me.

I think you should very much be entitled to do so, and I think it may be essential for your mental health.”

There is another possibility. You can try to resolve those feelings with people who you previously liked or loved. It may actually help to discuss these issues outside of the echo chamber of your political associations.

Of course, Yale University itself has followed this advice for years by removing faculty with opposing views for the general welfare of the community. Surveys show that 77% of Yale faculty “are registered as Democrats or have conducted political activity that heavily or exclusively supports Democrats; under 3% are Republican.” Furthermore, among 16 surveyed departments, “over 57%, have no registered Republicans at all. Across 14 departments in the Social Sciences and Humanities, the report identified 312 Democrat faculty (88%) and only 4 Republicans (1.1%), a ratio of around 78 to 1.”

Now, that is mental tranquility.

The suggestion that it may be “triggering” to see family and friends is not unique to Yale’s psychiatric staff.

Across the country, women have been cutting their hair and joining the Korean 4B movement—bihon (no marriage), bichulsan (no childbirth), biyeonae (no dating), and bisekseu (no sex). One is quoted as saying, “I fear The Handmaid’s Tale will become our reality.”

It is a curious response since figures like Reid blame white women for the loss. Trump won white women voters by eight points at 53 percent. Harris actually fell slightly in the support of women overall. Conversely, roughly 43 percent of men voted for Harris. Forty percent of women under 30 voted for Trump.

Yet I watched one deranged voter say that she is thinking of buying a “Glock” and shooting the first man who comes near her. If so, she would have an over 4 out of 10 likelihood of shooting a fellow Harris supporter.

None of this is good for our nation’s mental health and suggesting that people retreat further into their silos does not make for particularly healthy advice.

As discussed in my book, The Indispensable Right, we have become a nation of rage addicts. Taking another hit of rage will do little to break that addiction.

*  *  *

Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. He is the author of “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage” (Simon & Schuster, 2024).

Tyler Durden Mon, 11/11/2024 - 13:10
相关文章
联系我们 contact @ memedata.com