元声称洪流的盗版书不是违法的,没有播种证明
Meta claims torrenting pirated books isn't illegal without proof of seeding

原始链接: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/02/meta-defends-its-vast-book-torrenting-were-just-a-leech-no-proof-of-seeding/

梅塔(Meta)承认下载一个用于AI培训的盗版书数据集,但否认积极地“播种”或共享文件,这是版权诉讼中的关键点。像理查德·卡德里(Richard Kadrey)和莎拉·西尔弗曼(Sarah Silverman)这样的作者称,梅塔(Meta)非法复制并通过AI和洪流本身分发了他们的作品。 Meta认为Torrenting只是下载协议,声称他们采取了措施避免播种。作者断言,梅塔(Meta)进行了大规模的盗版活动,并非法分发了受版权保护的作品,指出了加利福尼亚的计算机数据访问和欺诈法。 META争辩说,仅通过洪流下载公开数据并不构成非法分布。 Meta是否播种文件并因此共享了受版权保护的作品,都可能会对案件的结果产生重大影响。作者声称,梅塔的洪流是“独立的非法”。该案件围绕下载盗版材料(即使没有积极分享)是否构成版权侵权。


原文

Just because Meta admitted to torrenting a dataset of pirated books for AI training purposes, that doesn't necessarily mean that Meta seeded the file after downloading it, the social media company claimed in a court filing this week.

Evidence instead shows that Meta "took precautions not to 'seed' any downloaded files," Meta's filing said. Seeding refers to sharing a torrented file after the download completes, and because there's allegedly no proof of such "seeding," Meta insisted that authors cannot prove Meta shared the pirated books with anyone during the torrenting process.

Whether or not Meta actually seeded the pirated books could make a difference in a copyright lawsuit from book authors including Richard Kadrey, Sarah Silverman, and Ta-Nehisi Coates. Authors had previously alleged that Meta unlawfully copied and distributed their works through AI outputs—an increasingly common complaint that so far has barely been litigated. But Meta's admission to torrenting appears to add a more straightforward claim of unlawful distribution of copyrighted works through illegal torrenting, which has long been considered established case-law.

Authors have alleged that "Meta deliberately engaged in one of the largest data piracy campaigns in history to acquire text data for its LLM training datasets, torrenting and sharing dozens of terabytes of pirated data that altogether contain many millions of copyrighted works." Separate from their copyright infringement claims opposing Meta's AI training on pirated copies of their books, authors alleged that Meta torrenting the dataset was "independently illegal" under California's Computer Data Access and Fraud Act (CDAFA), which allegedly "prevents the unauthorized taking of data, including copyrighted works."

Meta, however, is hoping to convince the court that torrenting is not in and of itself illegal, but is, rather, a "widely-used protocol to download large files." According to Meta, the decision to download the pirated books dataset from pirate libraries like LibGen and Z-Library was simply a move to access "data from a 'well-known online repository' that was publicly available via torrents."

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com