伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队誓言,对任何威胁将采取“果断”回应,此前特朗普两次轰炸也门。
IRGC Vows 'Decisive' Response To Any Threat After Trump Bombs Yemen Twice

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/irgc-vows-decisive-response-any-threat-after-trump-bombs-yemen-twice

继美国对也门胡塞武装发动空袭后,伊朗与美国之间的紧张局势升级。特朗普总统警告伊朗停止支持胡塞武装,威胁将采取严厉措施,并誓言保护国际水域。对此,伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队指挥官萨拉米坚称,伊朗将对任何美国的侵略行为采取果断报复,同时否认直接控制胡塞武装的行动。胡塞武装声称对针对红海美国军舰的导弹和无人机袭击负责,但五角大楼否认有任何成功的命中。AntiWar.com的戴夫·德坎普认为,轰炸胡塞武装适得其反,因为胡塞武装具有很强的韧性,而且他们的行动与以巴冲突有关。德坎普建议,美国本来可以通过确保以色列遵守加沙停火协议来保持平静。


原文

Iran has responded to weekend warnings and threats issued by US President Donald Trump, who ordered two waves of weekend airstrikes against its proxy in Yemen, the Houthis (Ansarallah).

The commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Maj. Gen. Hossein Salami, vowed Sunday that Iran would respond "decisively" to any threat or act of aggression from the United States. "Iran will never be the initiator of war, but in the event of a threat, the response will be firm, decisive, and conclusive," Salami was quoted in Iran’s PressTV as saying.

Hossein Salami, head of the Revolutionary Guards, via Reuters

Washington has for years assumed that every action from the Houthis has Iran's hidden hand behind it. But the IRGC's Salami rejected that notion, saying that the Ansarallah movement acts independently.

"The president of the United States has once again attributed the operations carried out by Yemen’s Ansar Allah to Iran and has warned the Iranian people to stop their support for the resistance group," he said of Trump's recent words. "Iran openly and clearly accepts responsibility for any actions it takes, when and where they occur," he said.

"We are not a nation that operates under the cloak of secrecy; rather, we are a legitimate and globally recognized entity," the IRGC general added. "When we undertake any military action or lend our support, we will declare it openly and unequivocally."

The United States' Saturday strike on Yemen not only resulted in possibly dozens of civilian deaths, but a reported over 100 injured, as President Trump vowed to "use overwhelming lethal force" while warning Iran to "immediately" cut its support.

"Your time is up, and your attacks must stop, starting today. If they don’t, hell will rain down upon you like nothing you have ever seen before," the president had said on Truth Social.

"No terrorist force will stop American commercial and naval vessels from freely sailing the Waterways of the World." That's when he had put Iran on notice, saying it will be held "fully accountable" for any aggression of its proxy in Yemen.

On Sunday, the Houthis declared said they launched 18 missiles and a drone at the "aircraft carrier USS Harry Truman and its accompanying warships" in the Red Sea. They followed by saying a second salvo was launched, but the Pentagon said nothing came close to hitting US warships, and any threat was intercepted.

The Islamic Republic has long been suspected of being the supplier of sophisticated ballistic missiles and drones with long ranges to the Houthis. This especially ramped up in the wake of the 2015 war involving the Saudi-UAE-US coalition bombing campaign over Yemen, which lasted half-a-decade or more. Some of these Iran-made ballistic missiles and drones have hit Saudi oil facilities in past years.

Below is some fresh commentary from AntiWar.com's Dave DeCamp...

I get why people who don't know much about the situation in Yemen might think it's a good idea to bomb the Houthis to secure shipping lanes. Here are a few reasons why it's a bad idea:

  • The Houthis (Ansar Allah) are incredibly resilient and have survived much worse than just a bombing campaign (US-backed Saudi/UAE war from 2015-2022)
  • Previous airstrikes against them only escalated their attacks and led to a bigger disruption of shipping
  • The Houthis aren't pirates; they're enforcing a blockade in response to Israel's blockade on Gaza - After the Gaza ceasefire deal was reached, the Houthis stopped their attacks
  • The Houthis haven't actually restarted attacks; they only announced they would be re-inforcing the blockade on Israeli shipping in response to Israel violating the ceasefire deal

DeCamp concludes with, "The US could have kept the situation in the Red Sea calm by forcing Israel to fully implement the Gaza ceasefire deal. This could have been done by leveraging military aid, but instead Trump chose to pour gasoline on the situation."

Loading...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com