(评论)
(comments)

原始链接: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43401421

Hacker News正在讨论Amazon S3 Tables和DuckDB的集成。一篇关于它们结合的文章引发了兴趣,评论者们称赞了S3中的parquet文件和DuckDB引擎的组合。一位用户尚未尝试S3 Tables,但却对此很感兴趣。然而,他们也表达了对其实用性的担忧,强调了由于服务由不同的团队管理,与其他AWS服务的潜在集成问题,并以过去的集成问题为例。他们质疑它与AWS生态系统中现有的表格产品有何不同。总的来说,讨论反映了对S3 Tables和DuckDB潜力的兴奋,以及对AWS环境中潜在挑战的担忧。


原文
Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
Preview: Amazon S3 Tables and Lakehouse in DuckDB (duckdb.org)
16 points by hn1986 53 minutes ago | hide | past | favorite | 3 comments










As a data engineering dabbler; parquet in S3 is beautiful. So is DuckDB. What an incredible match.


Anybody tried S3 tables? How is your experience? It seems more tempting now that DuckDB supports it.


Haven't tried it. S3 Tables sounds like a great idea. However, I am wary. For it to be useful, a suite of AWS services probably needs to integrate with it. These services are all managed by different teams that don't always work well together out of the box and often compete with redundant products. For example, configuring SageMaker Studio to use an EMR cluster for Spark was a multi-day hassle with a lot of custom (insecure?) configuration. How is this different from other existing table offerings? AWS is a mess.






Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact



Search:
联系我们 contact @ memedata.com