哈佛大学研究:开源软件的经济价值达8.8万亿美元
Harvard study: open-source has an economic value of 8.8T dollars

原始链接: https://www.heise.de/en/news/Harvard-study-Open-source-has-an-economic-value-of-8-8-trillion-dollars-10322643.html

哈佛商学院的一项研究估计,开源软件的经济价值高达8.8万亿美元,突显了其对软件行业的巨大贡献。如果没有开源软件,企业在软件开发上的支出将增加3.5倍。这一价值主要由大约3000名开发者驱动。96%的代码库中都存在开源代码。该研究对比了41.5亿美元的供给价值(开发成本)与惊人的8.8万亿美元的需求价值(如果企业自行开发所有软件的成本)。Go语言的需求价值最高,超过5万亿美元。研究人员分析了企业内部和网站上开源代码的使用情况,并利用来自30个国家的薪资数据。研究强调,开源是一种至关重要的资源,应该得到企业的大力支持和贡献,并得到政策制定者的推广。

哈佛大学的一项研究估计,开源软件(FOSS)的经济价值达8.8万亿美元,其中95%的价值来自大约3000名开发者的贡献。96%的代码库都集成了开源软件。 Hacker News上的评论员对这项研究的结果做出了反应,其中一位评论员强调了少数开发者的贡献比例过高。一位评论员计算出,每位开发者创造的价值为28亿美元。其他评论员认为,像Linux、PostgreSQL、OpenLDAP和Nginx这样的开源基础设施解决方案显著降低了托管成本,如果使用专有替代方案,将会导致价格大幅上涨。一位评论员还指出了将更多财富和权力集中在比尔·盖茨这样个人手中的潜在负面外部性。另一位评论员则担心这些开发者并没有得到与其贡献相匹配的足够报酬。
相关文章
  • (评论) 2025-02-24
  • (评论) 2024-09-23
  • (评论) 2024-02-10
  • 我应该开源我的公司吗? (2022) 2024-01-23
  • (评论) 2024-02-28

  • 原文

    Open-source software has an economic value of 8.8 trillion US dollars. Without open-source programs, companies would have to spend around 3.5 times more money on software. This is according to a study by Harvard Business School. Around 95 percent of this figure is attributable to 3,000 developers worldwide. In addition, open-source software is included in 96 percent of all codebases.

    Because open-source applications are mostly free of charge and their usage figures can only be measured to a limited extent, their value could not be determined from the product of price and sales. Instead, the researchers calculated the supply value, which describes the costs of developing new open-source programs. On the other hand, they calculated the demand value. This describes the costs that would be incurred by companies if they had to develop every open-source application themselves.

    According to the researchers' calculations, the supply value is 4.15 billion US dollars. In contrast, the demand value is 2000 times higher at 8.8 trillion US dollars. In comparison, global expenditure on software in 2020 amounted to around 3.4 trillion US dollars. In addition, around five percent of developers account for around 93 percent of the supply value and 96 percent of the demand value. According to the authors of the study, this uneven distribution is the result of a small number of developers using numerous repositories.

    The researchers also examined the commercial value of different programming and markup languages. The Go language, for example, has an offer value of around 803 million US dollars. It is followed by JavaScript with 758 million US dollars, Java with 658 million US dollars and C with 406 million US dollars. Although Python is the second most popular language on GitHub, its supply value is only 55 million US dollars. On the demand side, Go has the highest value at more than five trillion US dollars, which is more than four times higher than JavaScript in second place.

    To determine the use of open-source software in companies, the researchers use two different data sets. One of them identifies the open-source code that is incorporated into companies' products. The second data set shows the code that is available on the companies' websites. However, the data does not include all open-source projects. The researchers did not record open source operating systems. To calculate the economic value, the authors of the study used salary data from the 30 countries with the highest user shares on GitHub.

    In their study, the researchers point out that open-source software is a modern common good. They warn against overuse and urge companies to contribute to the development of open-source programs themselves, considering their economic value. They also believe that political decision-makers have a duty to promote open-source projects. Most recently, Max Mehl from DB Systel also discussed the value of open source in commercial software development at the FOSS Backstage Conference.

    (sfe)

    Don't miss any news – follow us on Facebook, LinkedIn or Mastodon.

    This article was originally published in German. It was translated with technical assistance and editorially reviewed before publication.

    联系我们 contact @ memedata.com