(评论)
(comments)

原始链接: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43517828

Hacker News 上的一个帖子讨论了一篇文章,该文章声称 Google 搜索不再可靠。许多评论者表示同意,他们列举了越来越不相关的搜索结果、过多的广告以及 AI 生成内容污染索引等问题。一些用户已经转向了 Kagi、Yandex 和百度等替代搜索引擎,尽管这些引擎可能存在审查或地域限制,但在通用搜索方面他们发现这些引擎更好。Kagi 用户尤其称赞其更简洁的界面和没有烦人的购物结果。其他人指出,搜索结果会根据用户个人资料和实验进行定制。帖子中也讨论了 Google 在索引内容方面的选择性问题,它可能偏向于高流量网站,而降低低流量域的优先级。一些人已经转向使用大型语言模型 (LLM) 来进行知识搜索。一位评论者反驳了这篇文章的说法,他表示自己找到了文章中提供的示例的正确信息,质疑了 Google 搜索质量下降的论点。最后,还有一些讨论是关于用非美国替代品替换美国产品,其中包括替换 Google。

相关文章
  • (评论) 2025-03-26
  • (评论) 2024-09-05
  • (评论) 2024-02-17
  • (评论) 2024-02-01
  • 我对卡吉失去了信心 2024-04-13

  • 原文
    Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
    I don't think I can trust Google as my search engine anymore (androidpolice.com)
    24 points by sundaybsunday 1 hour ago | hide | past | favorite | 21 comments










    I had a very very hard time to make the jump to Kagi passing the steps of "paying", and "setting kagi as my default browser" because of inertia, and also Fear Uncertainty and Doubt of change.

    But once I did it, that was very great, and a source of joy in my life. No regret at all.



    Same. I assumed it would be a marginally better product. I was wrong - it's a substantially superior product.

    I didn't realize Google had gotten so bad. They've been cooking their frogs for a long time



    I was concerned that I would still be semi-reliant on Google Search for things like local business opening hours etc. While it's true that Kagi doesn't return that stuff at the top of a search (I'm outside the US so YMMV), in practice it's been a non-issue because the top result—rather than an ad or some AI nonsense—is just that business' website. So at most it's one extra click.

    I don't think I've deliberately done a Google search since I signed up, apart from to check that the !g option works as expected with the Safari extension (c'mon Apple, support custom search engines already)



    Interesting how this site talks about the bad experience using google and while I scroll through it I'm shown more than 10 advertisements.


    yeah, my first thought on seeing this headline was "well, i don't trust androidpolice anymore either".

    Artem Russakovski was a great blogger back in the day, and androidpolice was a good site. it's since been sold on to new owners who are trying to milk it for all the money they can get, and fearmongering about google seems to be one of their surefire methods for getting some ad impressions. (not that google doesn't deserve the criticism. but this article isn't valuable criticism, it's just gripes with questionable truthfulness.)



    Too true.

    I've been using Yandex and Baidu recently.

    Sure, they censor as well to their usual audience. However, The quality of search respectively is actually quite good. I usually get at least 4 relevant results, whereas google is 0.

    The caveat is US based searches google still works best in, like 'where is restaurant or business'.

    But for general material, google lost me 2y ago. I grew tired of the dumb games and bad irrelevant garbage shoveled instead of search results.



    It’s been two years since I googled anything.

    They’re superior at finding shops on Maps.

    But for common search, they’re mediocre and untrustworthy, hiding real results way down below irrelevant spam.

    Who trusts an advertising company with search?



    I feel like Google is using a lossy backend for searching now. Sometimes I'll search some rare phrase that I know must exist somewhere, and Yandex (and often Bing) will turn up exact matches from some random blogs/forums, while Google will return zero results. If it's some kind of LLM-style memory it'd explain why Google can't find some rare terms. Or maybe Google thinks it's better to show no results than results from low traffic domains?


    There have been several posts on HN about Google no longer indexing the entire internet. My understanding is that AI generated content has become so common that Google has become selective about which content it will index. If low traffic sites don't put effort into getting their content indexed then it won't appear in Google results.


    the inability to make the horrible integrated shopping experience go away forced me to Kagi about a year ago. So much cleaner.


    Google search is not the product. Alphabet stock is the product. I'm in the market for a recently printed encyclopedia, a copy of the yellow pages and a subscription to a newspaper... Those were reliable products.


    Not to go off on a tangent, but I recently invested in a physical copy of the World Book Encyclopedia. It's nice to have a high probability of expertise, if not peer review, behind articles that pertain to facts that tend to change slowly. I learn faster and retain information longer when I receive it in physical form. Plus I don't have to contend with logins, ads, or the sort of interruptions/distractions that appear several times in online articles nowadays.


    Even online I’ve noticed Britannica is much more fair on politically controversial topics, whereas Wikipedia is well understand to be a command post to control to influence public opinion.


    What did you most recently look up?


    Information on opossums to identify the ones in my backyard, and their differences from Australian possums.


    The "Google is getting worse" trope is popular with a certain anti-mainstream segment but there's almost never examples of how something is wrong or bad or worse. This article has a few examples so I googled them myself:

    - "release year modern love roadrunners" -> 1976 (not 1995 as claimed). This article was posted 5 hours ago. Why am I getting the correct results then? For the record, the search "roadrunner modern lovers" (as per the screenshot) also says 1976;

    - "brian jonestown massacre anenome" -> lots of links including a video and lyrics (article claims was unknown or no details)

    I really don't know why there's so much reality-bending to make this story true.



    Google results are customized based on location, profile, ad settings, what random experiments you happen to get enrolled in, etc. Reality is indeed being bent, but only inside the personal search bubbles that you, the author, and every Google user lives in.


    To me the question has become somewhat moot - mostly because none of my serious knowledge searching questions are going via search engine anymore.

    Search-enabled LLMs fill that role better and google isn't the only game in town for that.

    ..and if using LLMs you have to assume at least some of it is dodgy so my guard is naturally up already.

    Doesn't leave a whole lot of space for "trust".



    You ever done any boxing? You can keep your guard up always but you'll still get hit in the face every time you go in there.


    Google gives you the wrong answers and your LLM gives you the wrong answers. Seems much of a muchness and either way worse than what we had before.


    All the Google bullshit did not made me switch the search engine, until recently when Trump external policy made me start replacing more and more USA stuff with non USA alternatives.






    Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!


    Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact



    Search:
    联系我们 contact @ memedata.com