TLDR
ToS;DR

原始链接: https://tosdr.org/en

ToS;DR 简化复杂的《服务条款》和《隐私政策》,通过透明的同行评审流程,提供易于理解的摘要。志愿者分析这些文件,标记关键点并分配评分:“好”、“中性”、“差”或“阻碍”。 根据这些汇总的评分,服务会收到A到E的等级,反映其条款的公平性: * **A:** 公平、尊重用户,并保护用户数据。 * **B:** 总体公平,但可以改进。 * **C:** 尚可,但需要仔细考虑。 * **D:** 存在不平衡或令人担忧的问题。 * **E:** 引发严重担忧。 “尚未评级”表示信息不足,无法进行准确评级。ToS;DR 依靠社区贡献来分析更多文件并扩大其覆盖范围,使用户能够做出关于其使用服务的明智决定。

Hacker News 最新 | 过去 | 评论 | 提问 | 展示 | 工作 | 提交 登录 ToS;DR (tosdr.org) 11 分 ColinWright 38 分钟前 | 隐藏 | 过去 | 收藏 | 1 评论 serbuvlad 2 分钟前 [–] 好主意。第一印象有点奇怪。维基百科有 4 个差评 1 个好评,评级为 B。Tor 有 0 个差评 3 个好评,评级为 C。DuckDuckGo 只有一个差评:“此服务不会直接询问,而是仅凭您的使用就认定您同意。”,评级为 B,大概是因为这个原因。Startpage 评级为 A,没有差评,但使用 Startpage 也不会提示我同意任何东西。 回复 加入我们,参加 6 月 16-17 日在旧金山举行的 AI 初创企业学校! 指南 | 常见问题 | 列表 | API | 安全 | 法律 | 申请 YC | 联系我们 搜索:
相关文章

原文

ToS;DR aims to provide easy-to-understand summaries of Privacy Policies and Terms of Service through a transparent and peer-reviewed process.

Terms of service are reviewed by volunteer contributors, who highlight small points that we can discuss, compare and ultimately assign a score: "good", "neutral", "bad", and scariest of all, "blocker".

Once a service has enough points to assess the fairness of their terms, we use a formula to provide ratings from Grade A to Grade E:

  • Grade A — The terms of service treat you fairly, respect your rights, and will not abuse your data.
  • Grade B — The terms of service are fair towards the user but they could be improved.
  • Grade C — The terms of service are okay but some issues need your consideration.
  • Grade D — The terms of service are very uneven, or there are some important issues that need your attention.
  • Grade E — The terms of service raise very serious concerns.
  • No Grade Yet — Not enough information exists to accurately grade this service yet.

Right now you will notice that many services do not yet have a grade assigned. This is where you come in! Help us analyse more documents so that we may increase our coverage.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com