世界为什么正在失去色彩?
Why is the world losing color?

原始链接: https://www.culture-critic.com/p/why-is-the-world-losing-color

色彩正在从我们的世界消失,黑白色的汽车、中性化的消费品和黑白的品牌标识就是明证。这一趋势源于西方思想史上对色彩的贬低,人们将其视为理性理解的感官干扰。柏拉图和康德等哲学家偏爱形式而非色彩,认为色彩混乱且不稳定。这种偏见在现代主义建筑中更加强烈,现代主义建筑偏爱简洁朴素的风格。 如今,这转化为单调的环境和迎合最广泛受众的愿望,导致感官扁平化。追求严肃的品牌通常会选择柔和的美学风格。然而,历史上有反例,例如巴洛克艺术,它证明色彩和形式可以和谐统一,创造出强大而令人振奋的体验。拥抱色彩并不等同于混乱;它是对文化不适感的拒绝,也是迈向更加丰富多彩世界的一步。

Hacker News上的一篇讨论探讨了世界正在“褪色”的观点。一些评论者对此提出了质疑,认为现代美学更倾向于采用中性色调作为基础,并用彩色点缀来形成雅致的对比,而不是让人眼花缭乱的“色彩暴动”。一些人指出,持续不断的色彩刺激会造成视觉疲劳。 另一些人则不同意这种说法,他们列举了一些自己喜欢的色彩鲜艳的设计,并对将标志设计简化为白色或灰色的趋势表示惋惜。一些人认为这种转变是由于市场营销的重点发生了变化,中性色更能吸引更广泛的消费者群体,而另一些人则认为某些颜色可能销售速度较慢。也有人称之为“千禧一代的乏味”,并认为Z世代正在摒弃这种趋势。讨论涉及到历史潮流、电影色彩分级,甚至零售业中色彩选择的心理学。一些人认为这种转变反映了更广泛的文化转变,即从工人阶级价值观转向上层阶级的网红文化影响。
相关文章

原文

Walk around in the average parking lot, and you’ll find yourself in a sea of black, white, and silver vehicles. Watch Netflix at home or catch a film in the theaters, and you’ll get the same washed-out color grade on either screen. Glance at the logos of the world’s largest companies, and you’ll notice a shrinking palette.

It all points to one thing: color is vanishing from our world.

This isn’t just a hunch. Studies of everything from car paint to consumer objects show that we’re in the midst of a vast aesthetic shift. What used to be vibrant has become sterile. What used to pop out and catch our attention now fades into the background.

The question is — why?

The answer isn’t just about fashion or materials, but is rooted in a much older understanding of the relationship between color and truth.

Here’s why color is disappearing from our world, and what we can do to bring it back…

Reminder: you can support us and get tons of members-only content for a few dollars per month 👇

  • Full-length articles every Wednesday and Saturday

  • Members-only podcasts and exclusive interviews

  • The entire archive of great literature, art and philosophy breakdowns

Approximately 1% of our readers currently support us with a paid subscription. We are almost entirely reader-supported, so a paid upgrade helps our mission immensely. 🙏

The colors around us aren’t just changing. They’re disappearing.

According to major auto paint suppliers, more than 80% of new cars are now grayscale. Black, white, gray, and silver dominate the roads. Reds, blues, and greens in auto production are increasingly rare.

It’s not just cars — a study of over 7,000 objects in the UK’s Science Museum found that the colors of consumer goods have been steadily neutralized since 1800. Bright, saturated tones have been giving way to gray, beige, and taupe for centuries.

Graphic design has followed a similar trend. Streaming platforms, fashion brands, and e-commerce hubs are consistently rebranding in black-and-white. Most recently, HBO’s move to rename its service “Max” was accompanied by a logo redesign that stripped away its original blue — replacing it, of course, with stark white text on a black background.

Even cinema has gone gray. Although Ridley Scott’s Napoleon was shot on vivid, richly colored sets, its final color-grade — like that of many historical dramas — washes out all the colors in a somber, blueish-gray tint. It’s a visual style that has become so ubiquitous that directors like Wes Anderson are often considered “unorthodox” for their use of vibrant color in film.

On the surface, there are some straightforward reasons for this. Industrial materials like steel and plastic, for example, are produced in neutral shades. Grayscale branding for logos is easier to reproduce and scale. Muted palettes are less likely to alienate customers.

But this isn't the whole story. To fully understand why color is disappearing from our world, we have to go further back…

Color has always had a strange status in Western philosophy — and more often than not, that status is second-class.

In Chromophobia, art theorist David Batchelor argues that the devaluation of color can be traced to the very birth of Western thought. From Plato onward, color was treated as a distraction: sensory noise that got in the way of rational understanding.

Plato described the world of appearances as a deceptive “prison-house,” i.e., a realm of illusion where truth could only be grasped by looking beyond the senses. Color, tied directly to sensation, was thus something to overcome — not to embrace.

Aristotle echoed the sentiment. In Poetics, he argued that the power of artwork lay in its structure, not its palette:

“A random distribution of the most attractive colors would never yield as much pleasure as a definite image without color.”

For Aristotle, it’s form that holds meaning — not hue.

This view persisted through the Enlightenment, with German philosopher Immanuel Kant arguing that while color may add charm to art, it has no bearing on true aesthetic judgment. In his view, color neither touches reason nor elevates the mind.

The underlying theory in all of these cases is that while color is sensory, unstable, and chaotic, form is rational, stable, and pure. Once you see this bias, you begin to notice how deeply it has shaped the modern world — and how it helps explain our current retreat into colorlessness.

The modernist philosophy developed in the early 20th century helped push Western culture’s underlying suspicion of color to its extreme. For architects like Adolf Loos, color was a kind of primitive indulgence — the enemy of clarity and seriousness.

In his 1910 lecture Ornament and Crime, Loos celebrated a future without decoration or color, where aesthetic purity came from form alone. “We have gone beyond ornament,” he famously declared. “We have achieved plain, undecorated simplicity.”

The legacy of his ideal is everywhere: sterile office parks, concrete apartment blocks, glass-and-steel towers that all look the same. Mass market forces mean that everything from buildings to branding is designed to appeal to everyone — but in doing so, it resonates with no one.

The same impulse is even reshaping music. In the streaming era, songs are engineered to appeal to massive, borderless audiences. The result is a flattening of the sensory experience — from reduced dynamic range (the difference between the loudest and quietest parts of a song) to less “complex” musical elements like a key change. In other words, the musical equivalent of beige walls.

Behind all of this is a belief that to be rational is to suppress the sensory, and that the more universal something is intended to be, the less color it can afford to show.

Brands that want to be taken "seriously" choose muted storefronts — unlike, say, a colorful book or jewelry store with no such ambitions.

But it doesn’t have to be this way…

In today’s world, we often associate vivid color with chaos, childishness, or excess. But history offers plenty of counterexamples — times where color and form worked together to overwhelm, inspire, and elevate.

Baroque art, for example, is full of riotous color. Its churches and canvases explode with golds, reds, blues, and greens. But it doesn't result in chaos. The color is structured, and works within a powerful formal logic that stirs both emotion and intellect. You feel it, and you follow it.

Baroque art stands in direct defiance of the chromophobic worldview. It doesn’t strip down experience in the name of order, but rather builds it up — embracing sensation and structure together.

It also provides a useful reminder that color doesn’t have to mean disorder. It doesn’t have to undermine seriousness. And indeed, the reflex to strip it away may reveal more about our cultural discomfort than our aesthetic taste. For when we mute our surroundings, we risk muting ourselves.

It’s time to bring color back.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com