原文
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
（评论）
(comments)
原始链接: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43605670
Hacker News用户正在讨论美国股指期货暴跌引发的潜在经济影响，而这暴跌是由贸易紧张局势引发的。一些人推测市场崩盘是蓄意的，是为了让富人能够以更低的价格购买资产，不过其他人则认为这是阴谋论，并将此归咎于总统的关税政策。随后展开了一场辩论，讨论市场下滑受影响最大的是谁：富人，他们的投资组合可能会缩水；还是中产阶级和工薪阶层，他们面临失业和生活质量下降。评论者强调了股票所有权在富人中的集中度，另一些人则指出，虽然富人可能在绝对数字上损失金钱，但穷人由于安全网规模小得多，实际上遭受的损失更大。还有人认为，这场危机正在侵蚀人们对美国政府的长期信心。一些用户还在评论共和党的目标是肢解政府并将其出售。
相关文章
Just don't see how this materializes in any meaningful timeframe in the United States — if it's even doable at all.
It also ignores the fact that since the 1970s the United States has transitioned more and more to information and services jobs.
The only plausible way out I see in the near term is a bunch of carve outs and one-off deals that allows the U.S. government to say, "our bluff worked."
But long term, automation is going to be taking more and more of these jobs and I just don't see how you justify sneakers costing what it will cost to pay American workers enough to prosper.
Personally from an environmental standpoint I've questioned for a couple of decades now whether we can ever slow down and try and buy more sustainable goods even if they cost more. But this way of trying to get there feels like medieval medicine.
reply