最高法院支持特朗普政府关于委内瑞拉人驱逐出境的立场,但要求对每一起案件进行正当程序。
Supreme Court Sides With Trump Over Venezuelan Deportations, But Requires Due Process For Each Case

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/supreme-court-sides-trump-over-venezuelan-deportations-requires-due-process-each-case

最高法院以5比4的裁决支持特朗普政府,叫停了下级法院阻止根据《敌国侨民法》(AEA)驱逐涉嫌为委内瑞拉帮派(特伦德阿拉瓜)成员的命令。虽然该裁决允许驱逐出境继续进行,但法院规定被拘留者必须收到通知并获得正当程序,允许他们在被驱逐前寻求法律救济。这一要求削弱了特朗普政府的胜果。索托马约尔大法官撰写了反对意见,卡根大法官和杰克逊大法官加入,巴雷特大法官部分加入。特朗普政府辩称,此案提出了关于国家安全事务中总统权力与司法权力的根本问题。原告,一群委内瑞拉国民,认为阻止驱逐出境对于防止个人在未经司法程序的情况下被送往危险的外国监狱至关重要。


原文

The Supreme Court on Monday sided with the Trump administration's request to halt lower court judge James Boasberg's order stopping Trump from deporting suspected members of Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua under the Alien Enemies Act (AEA).

Salvadoran prison guards escort alleged members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua and the MS-13 gang recently deported by the U.S. government to be imprisoned in the Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) prison, as part of an agreement with the Salvadoran government, in Tecoluca, El Salvador, on March 30, 2025. Secretaria de Prensa de la Presidencia/Reuters

"We grant the application and vacate the [temporary restraining orders]," the court said in its unsigned 5-4 opinion.

And while this may be a win for Trump, its impact was muted by the fact that detainees must be given due process before they are deported.

"AEA detainees must receive notice after the date of this order that they are subject to removal under the Act. The notice must be afforded within a reasonable time and in such a manner as will allow them to actually seek habeas relief in the proper venue before such removal occurs," the court wrote in its majority opinion.

Predictably penning the dissent was Justice Sonia Sotomayor - who was joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, while Justice Amy Coney Barrett partially joined Sotomayor’s dissent.

The decision came after the Trump administration and plaintiffs in the initial case filed competing briefs to the justices.

According to Acting US Solicitor General Sarah Harris, the "case presents fundamental questions about who decides how to conduct sensitive national-security-related operations in this country—the President, through Article II, or the Judiciary, through [temporary restraining orders]."

The Trump administration launched their appeal to the Supreme Court after the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit sided with Boasberg.

The plaintiffs, which included a group of Venezuelan nationals, told the court on April 1 that the lower court's block on deportations "ensures that, based on an unprecedented peacetime invocation of the AEA, additional individuals are not hurried off to a brutal foreign prison, potentially for the rest of their lives, without judicial process."

The Supreme Court on Monday sided with the Trump administration's request to halt lower court judge James Boasberg's order stopping Trump from deporting suspected members of Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua under the Alien Enemies Act (AEA).

Salvadoran prison guards escort alleged members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua and the MS-13 gang recently deported by the U.S. government to be imprisoned in the Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) prison, as part of an agreement with the Salvadoran government, in Tecoluca, El Salvador, on March 30, 2025. Secretaria de Prensa de la Presidencia/Reuters

"We grant the application and vacate the [temporary restraining orders]," the court said in its unsigned 5-4 opinion.

And while this may be a win for Trump, its impact was muted by the fact that detainees must be given due process before they are deported.

"AEA detainees must receive notice after the date of this order that they are subject to removal under the Act. The notice must be afforded within a reasonable time and in such a manner as will allow them to actually seek habeas relief in the proper venue before such removal occurs," the court wrote in its majority opinion.

Predictably penning the dissent was Justice Sonia Sotomayor - who was joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, while Justice Amy Coney Barrett partially joined Sotomayor’s dissent.

The decision came after the Trump administration and plaintiffs in the initial case filed competing briefs to the justices.

According to Acting US Solicitor General Sarah Harris, the "case presents fundamental questions about who decides how to conduct sensitive national-security-related operations in this country—the President, through Article II, or the Judiciary, through [temporary restraining orders]."

The Trump administration launched their appeal to the Supreme Court after the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit sided with Boasberg.

The plaintiffs, which included a group of Venezuelan nationals, told the court on April 1 that the lower court's block on deportations "ensures that, based on an unprecedented peacetime invocation of the AEA, additional individuals are not hurried off to a brutal foreign prison, potentially for the rest of their lives, without judicial process."

*  *  *

Best sellers at ZH Store last week:

FREE SHIPPING OVER $50!

Loading...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com