关于隐私,我早该知道的事
What I wish I knew about privacy sooner

原始链接: https://nordictimes.com/tech/what-i-wish-i-knew-about-privacy-sooner/

不要相信牺牲隐私才能享受科技进步的谬论。你可以掌控你的数据。关键在于选择、语境和设定界限。分享一些信息并不意味着允许被永久、无处不在的追踪。 道德的数据实践是存在的。寻找那些不保留不必要数据,并支持同态加密(允许在不解密的情况下进行数据分析)等创新的平台。零知识证明也提供了一种更安全的方式来验证身份,而无需透露敏感信息。 向企业和机构要求更好的隐私优先系统。不要接受隐私与进步之间的权衡。选择尊重您隐私的工具,使用保护隐私的技术,并记住,夺回控制权永远不会太晚。谈论它,并要求更好。知情不应该意味着被剥削。

这篇 Hacker News 帖子讨论了 nordictimes.com 上的一篇文章,标题是“早知如此,我该怎样保护隐私”,文章警告了通过看似无害的数据点(如电池电量和浏览习惯)进行重新识别的风险,并告诫不要通过数据经纪商将新的身份与旧的身份关联起来。 然而,帖子很快将焦点转移到了来源。用户指出 Nordic Times 与一个新法西斯组织有关联,引发了关于是否应该基于其来源而驳斥其内容的讨论。文章也被发现是从 ludlowinstitute.org 上逐字复制的。 一些用户建议不要使用 Brave 或 Mullvad 浏览器,认为主流浏览器具有更好的上游安全响应,安全性更高。 最后,有人呼吁用 ludlowinstitute.org 的源 URL 替换原始的 Nordic Times 链接,并请求推荐更好的隐私文章。

原文

Let’s be honest: data is useful. But we’re constantly told that in order to benefit from modern tech—and the insights that come with it—we have to give up our privacy. That useful data only comes from total access. That once your info is out there, you’ve lost control. That there’s no point in trying to protect it anymore.

These are myths. And they’re holding us back.

The truth is, you can benefit from data-driven tools without giving away everything. You can choose which companies to trust. You can protect one piece of information while sharing another. You can demand smarter systems that deliver insights without exploiting your identity.

Privacy isn’t about opting out of technology—it’s about choosing how you engage with it.

In this issue, we’re busting four of the most common myths about data collection. Because once you understand what’s possible, you’ll see how much power you still have.

This one is everywhere. Once people sign up for a social media account or share info with a fitness app, they often throw up their hands and say, “Well, I guess my privacy’s already gone”.

But that’s not how privacy works.

Privacy is about choice. It’s about context. It’s about setting boundaries that make sense for you.

Just because you’ve shared data with one company doesn’t mean you’re giving blanket permission to every app, government agency, or ad network to track you forever.

You’re allowed to:

  • Share one piece of information and protect another.
  • Say yes to one service and no to others.
  • Change your mind, rotate your identifiers, and reduce future exposure.

Privacy isn’t all or nothing. And it’s never too late to take some power back.

Many businesses are committed to ethical data practices. Some explicitly state in their terms that they’ll never share your data, sell it, or use it outside the scope of the service you signed up for.

Look for platforms that don’t retain unnecessary data. There are more of them out there than you think.

This one’s finally starting to crumble—thanks to game-changing tech like homomorphic encryption.

Yes, really: companies can now do compute on encrypted data without ever decrypting it.

It’s already in use in financial services, research, and increasingly, consumer apps. It proves that privacy and data analysis can go hand in hand.

Imagine this: a health app computes your sleep averages, detects issues, and offers recommendations—without ever seeing your raw data. It stays encrypted the whole time.

We need to champion this kind of innovation. More research. More tools. More adoption. And more support for companies already doing it—because our business sends a signal that this investment was worth it for them, and encourages other companies to jump on board.

You’ve heard this from banks, employers, and government forms: “We need your full ID to verify who you are”.

But here’s the problem: every time we hand over sensitive data, we increase our exposure to breaches and identity theft. It’s a bad system.

There’s a better way.
With zero-knowledge proofs, we can prove things like being over 18, or matching a record—without revealing our address, birthdate, or ID number.

The tech already exists. But companies and institutions are slow to adopt it or even recognize it as legitimate. This won’t change until we demand better.

Let’s push for a world where:

  • Our identity isn’t a honeypot for hackers.
  • We can verify ourselves without becoming vulnerable.
  • Privacy-first systems are the norm—not the exception.

The idea that we have to trade privacy for progress is a myth. You can have both. The tools exist. The choice is ours.

Privacy isn’t about hiding—it’s about control. You can choose to share specific data without giving up your rights or exposing everything.

Keep these in mind:

  • Pick tools that respect you. Look for platforms with strong privacy practices and transparent terms.
  • Use privacy-preserving tech. Homomorphic encryption and zero-knowledge proofs are real—and growing.
  • Don’t give up just because you shared once. Privacy is a spectrum. You can always take back control.
  • Talk about it. The more people realize they have options, the faster we change the norm.

Being informed doesn’t have to mean being exploited.
Let’s demand better.

 

Yours in privacy,
Naomi

Naomi Brockwell is a privacy advocacy and professional speaker, MC, interviewer, producer, podcaster, specialising in blockchain, cryptocurrency and economics. She runs the NBTV channel on Youtube.
联系我们 contact @ memedata.com