(评论)
(comments)

原始链接: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44064631

Hacker News 上的一个帖子讨论了特朗普政府取消哈佛大学学生及交换访问项目认证(SEVP),从而阻止其招收国际学生的决定。评论员们表达了对这一举动将会损害美国对顶尖国际人才的吸引力,并对美国高等教育和国际影响力造成负面影响的担忧。一些人认为这是对哈佛大学拒绝提供国际学生详细记录的要求的报复,将其与更广泛的政治动机和对法治的漠视联系起来。 关于选民对其当选官员行为的责任,展开了辩论。人们对现有国际学生的命运表示担忧,一些人提到了现有的法律挑战,这些挑战阻止了终止国际学生合法身份的行为。另一些人指出,目前的法律行动针对的是哈佛大学招收国际学生的能力,而不是学生现有的身份。 一些评论员认为,加拿大和欧盟的顶尖大学可能会从这一决定中受益。其他人则推测可能面临的法律挑战以及其他大学可能进行自我审查。少数发帖者表达了一些人认为这项行动是合理的,这是一个积极的结果。


原文
Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
Trump administration halts Harvard's ability to enroll international students (nytimes.com)
186 points by S0y 2 hours ago | hide | past | favorite | 115 comments












I get flak for hating Republican voters with the general feeling of most people being that voters are not responsible for the officials THEY elected to represent them.

I still haven't found a valid argument for why a voter isn't held responsible for the actions of representatives. Especially if the actions would be likely to occur.



Voters face the consequence for their voting. So, in that meaning, they are responsible for the actions of the representatives.


Except sometimes the first order consequences are far greater than second order, and you vote for people who have first order consequences on others.


Are they not?


In what way would you like to hold them responsible? If there are reprisals for voting, do we live in a liberal democracy?


I feel US higher education, which brain drains the rest of the world, is easily one of the best strategic advantages it could have for the next 100 years.

Let’s throw that all away because learning is liberal.



The action by itself comes as a punishment which imply that this is indeed great resource but because Harvard was a naughty boy means that can't have it.

I want to note that when Brexit happened EU citizens had about 2 years period to move to UK and just like that get their full rights there and those with enough years of stay had the right to obtain British citizenship. Streamlined process through scanning your id using an app, little to no hassle.

IIRC half of the EU citizens left despite having all those rights and streamlined bureaucracy. My observation was that those desperate or those who ware having their perfect life stayed, those who had other options left UK because it wasn't worth the stress and you future being bargaining chips for politicians.

I bet you, if this continues for some more time USA will no longer receive the best and the brightest. Those have options and their parents will prefer the options where their golden kids don't risk being subject to life changing actions or even abuse.



Yeah, getting the worlds top brainiancs and enticing them with a good education and having some of them build their lives here is one of our greatest imports.


"The worlds top brainiacs" were a huge part of what "Made America Great" in the first place. The MAGA "leadership" is doing the exact literal polar opposite of the stated mission of their slogan (and with far more than just education; wrecking the economy, alienating our allies, destroying freedom of speech, enabling and even encouraging pollution [and trying to even mandate it in California apparently] ... the list goes on).


MAGA sincerely thinks they’re the real brainiacs.


Waterloo, McGill, and U of Toronto admissions offices should be spending the entire day tomorrow calling the full international Harvard roster ASAP.


Honestly as an American, I would seriously consider how my daughter can go to these top Canadian or EU schools.


Another great one is ETH Zurich, although if truth be hold, K12+4+2 education is 100% obsolete now by AI; only PhD is still very relevant.


This is essentially cultural revolution from the right.


Education is obsolete thanks to AI. US is just ahead of the curve as usual.

(/s in case it wasn't obvious)



> Let’s throw that all away because learning is liberal.

Makes me think of:

"Reality has a well known liberal bias" - Stephen Colbert

The amount of "burn it all down because I don't like the people that like this thing" is depressing.



Don’t miss this bit. Currently enrolled students are going to need to find a new university.

> In a news release, the Department of Homeland Security sent a stark message to Harvard’s international students: “This means Harvard can no longer enroll foreign students, and existing foreign students must transfer or lose their legal status.”



A judge has already blocked the move.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/judge-blocks-tr...

> A federal judge in California has blocked the Trump administration from terminating the legal statuses of international students at universities across the U.S.



This is not the same issue. Judges can be fast, but not that fast. Both the decision and this action against Harvard happened within an hour of eachother.


I believe they've taken a different tactic here - attacking Harvard's ability to enroll international students, not the students' status directly.


The article states "existing foreign students must transfer or lose their legal status"; this injunction would appear to pause that.


The semester is already over, many of them went home. They'll simply be refused when they try to come back.


Can someone ELI5 the power networks involved here?

I didn't expect to see Harvard getting smacked around or humiliated like this.

Between Harvard, Yale, and possibly a few other schools, I thought they had influence throughout government. And that key figures in government were interested in maintaining and benefiting from that influence.

And a lot of that influence seemed aligned with national interests. (For example, getting things done with prestige connections, domestically and internationally. And the international diplomatic goodwill, when children of the world's wealthy and powerful go to prestigious schools in the US.)

Is some other faction at work now, or is it the same people as before? Are the power networks changing? If the distribution of power is changing, is it partly due to someone willing to sacrifice national power from which all parties benefited (and everyone else wasn't expecting that, or wasn't ready to defend against that from within)? Better questions?



You're overthinking this. The university is vocal about keeping its independence. That's enough to warrant retaliation from this president.


The Project 2025 people and the Yarvinists agree that elite universities like Harvard are spreading the “woke mind virus” and must be destroyed. They consider their movements a revolution, not an iteration on the status quo.


Harvard (and to a lesser extent, the rest of the Ivy League) collects a lot of federal money, this comes with certain conditions around treating people fairly without respect to skin color, ethnicity, or religion.

A regular corporation with the same fact pattern of discrimination would be looking at a billion+ dollar fine.

this is just Harvard losing some special privilges and being expected to act reasonably fairly like any other publicly funded institution.

https://substack.com/home/post/p-163976813

They're not actually so scientifically productive that we should tolerate discrimination in order to get the fruits of their research.



I wonder what avenues there are for Harvard to challenge this; it looks like the mechanism the Trump Admin used was for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to cancel Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) certification [0] which is managed by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) [1].

Does ICE just have full discretion over SEVP? Can they do this to any school for whatever reason they want?

[0] https://www.dhs.gov/news/2025/05/22/harvard-university-loses...

[1] https://www.dhs.gov/publication/dhsicepia-001-student-exchan...



The actual letter explains they can regain status by ratting out their students.

It will quietly be done, although likely in a way that make it look as if Harvard hasn't.



Maybe, but I doubt it. Trump is not a mafia boss - time after time he showed that his words cannot be trusted. If Harvard makes a concession, there's no guarantee that Trump will "forgive" it.

Look how China is dealing with Trump. Trump announces tariffs, China returns Boeing planes, tariffs somehow comes down.



As a sovereign nation, China is in a somewhat different position than Harvard which is subject to US law.


It's too bad Barron was too dumb to enroll at Harvard so his admission couldn't be rescinded


If you are a Republican and didn’t sign up for this, can you please write your representatives about impeachment? This is getting ridiculous. We’d be much better off with a president Vance.


I used to think that the Republican officials just put on a mask and perform kabuki for their Dear Leader. But the signalgate texts proved otherwise. This kind of thinking has penetrated deep into the party. It's not going away. Not with Vance.


> We’d be much better off with a president Vance.

Vance literally defended the eating cats and dogs lie during the debate. The entire fucking point of this platform is to fuck the immigrants, legal or otherwise.

Or is this actually a surprise to anyone with half a brain?



If you are a Republican, you DID sign up for this. None of this has been kept secret.


Sometimes you sign up for things, because the advertisment did look great. But then, at one point, you want to cancel that subscription.


My point is, this was the advertisement. If you thought it looked great, you signed up for it. And if you didn't vote for this, but you voted for something ridiculous like banning around dozen people from playing sports, well, I have the same amount of sympathy for you too.


If that's the case, you're an easily-duped sucker of a customer and deserve to lose your money.


Ok. Maybe I'm easily-duped. But what about this particular headline is something that I should care about, even slightly? Higher education is one of the biggest grifts out there. I would much rather that they be knocked down a peg or three, which if it continues long enough might even result in lower prices for domestic students. With fewer students seeking applying, there will be more room there for Americans.

The Democrats continue to try to stoke outrage about events and conditions that, quite frankly, no one gives a shit about. They've lost the plot. Meanwhile, I've just learned that suppressors are likely to become legalized here in the coming months. It's a small thing, of course, but that's net positive in my book.



Lots and lots of people accurately predicted this multiple years out at this point. They were continually dismissed as alarmists by supposedly “serious people”.


And yet some have held that subscription for years..


The problems at Harvard and other high ed organizations are real. They've become pretty unhinged and really need to work on getting back to "open forum for discussing all ideas" rather than the "Open forum for discussing all correct ideas" that they have drifted into. I can see it first hand through my mother, who works at a major school.

That being said, republicans decided to chose an M1 Abrams tank to kill the pesky mice in the system.



I signed up for this. Harvard must be punished for it's discrimination against White people, Asian people, Jewish people, and Men.


The probability of impeachment succeeding at this time is effectively zero.


Anything difficult is effectively impossible until you decide to begin working on it.


Sure, but there are "get your kid to eat veggies" levels of "effectively impossible", and then there's "quantum teleport into the bank vault" levels of it.

This is more like the latter. There aren't many signs of us hitting the bottom thus far.



A few million to Fusion GPS would be a good start


Even if it were possible for Dems to get control of the house and impeach the prez, there is no way that Senate will convict unless the GOP Senate goes back to becoming the GOP instead of the MAGA-GOP, which seems extremely unlikely.


Its interesting, you don't have enough republicans united to pass any of the agenda as law instead of executive orders but you also don't have 3 republicans willing to break to impeach for doing stuff they don't want (otherwise they'd pass it as law).



Even if impeachment is off the cards, is it impossible to imagine that there could be any sort of impact from Republican lawmakers hearing Republican voters that, or other things are not what they voted for or want?


It’s zero if nobody actually says anything. The legislature has the power to reign in the president. They only have to threaten a bipartisan impeachment.


Unfortunately I don't see a route where Republicans vote for impeachment, ever. They're already refusing to listen to constituents, hiding from their elected duties and letting Trump freely crash the economy on a whim.


Republicans will not give up power unless doing so saves their fortunes or saves their lives.


Impeachment of Kristi Noem could be more likely to succeed though.


Most Republicans around me are extremely happy with this.


Republicans signed up for this. Some of them want plausible deniality, but that is about it.


> When a University’s SEVP certification is revoked, currently enrolled international students must choose between transferring to a different institution, changing their immigration status, or leaving the country, according to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement website.

It's crazy they're punishing tons of students who don't even have anything to do with these protests



It’s also crazy (read: unconstitutional) to punish students who do have everything to do with these protests.


not crazy if you follow this flowchart:

     does it own the libs?      N ---> dont do it

             Y
             |
             |
             v
           DO IT !


s/crazy/deliberately evil/g

They might prefer to start with certain targets, but all international students are target of opportunity, the same way they've attacked all sorts of law-abiding legal immigrants. [0]

[0] Though perhaps with some very particular and suspicious quasi-ethnic exceptions. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crljn5046epo



What will the HN crowd do when Y Combinator's banned from foreign participants?


Insane how freely the US is giving away its status as a brain drain magnet (context: I'm European).


Has there ever been an empire that committed suicide at the height of power?


They still are, they just flipped the poles.


If you voted for this admin, please go get your own flag and give me mine back.


If they can do this to Harvard, what hope do other universities have?


They’re trying to make an example of Harvard so they don’t need to force anyone else to tow the line. Other universities will self censor.


They're harassing Columbia too because the administration wasn't sufficiently genocidal, despite being genocidal.


Most the universities will do the thing asked in order to re-instate their student visa certification. i.e. provide intel needed to deport any students that they believe have opinions that are not in the interest of national security.

Most likely Harvard will try to fight it in court and then give in if they lose. It's not likely we see the future decertification continue into the academic year.



> they believe have opinions that are not in the interest of national security

So people committing thought crimes huh?

This is the US in 2025 - indefinitely imprisoning people without any actual charges for having opinions the current administration doesn't like.



Can they really do this? You're telling me this is real and not one of those "just for show" things that have no real teeth and will eventually get overturned by a judge?


Checks and balances are just words. So yes, they can and will do everything they want.


I mean Harvard will fight back in court. The courts are last bastion. Once the executive branch stops following what the courts order the checks and balances are gone.


How is the Supreme Court's 9-0 decision in favor of returning Garcia working out?

The courts have been beaten months ago. We are well into crazy train territory.



It already has. They're already gone.


> will eventually get overturned by a judge

Will the people who had to transfer or leave be made whole? Even if a judge overturns this it will take time that the students impacted by this will have to pay, regardless of outcome.



Yea, that’s the message they are trying to send.


that's underselling it - they're also making it so every single existing interrnational student has to leave the US very soon, and in the meantime can be kidnapped by ICE.


Government policy in the form of personal grudges rather than law and good policy.


Harvard as an institution is older than the USA. It will survive 4 years of a lunatic's presidency.


As it’s going, probably 8 years.


or 8+ years


He will already have serves his second (and therefore last) term, or what do you mean?


It's not just enrolling new students:

> In a news release, the Department of Homeland Security sent a stark message to Harvard’s international students: “This means Harvard can no longer enroll foreign students, and existing foreign students must transfer or lose their legal status.”

So DHS revoked the visas for all existing students at Harvard? That doesn't seem quite possible?

Doesn't give them a timeline either.

The best and the brightest from around the world will prioritize top universities at other countries, and this will damage one of the US' biggest attractions and advantages.

Unbelievable.



I wonder how many foreign heads of state have children at Harvard


It's likely foreign heads of state can obtain a different visa for their children, if they are even on student visas to begin with.

They will be accommodated.



TRO in 5, 4, 3...


Trump is acting in the manner of all previous authoritarians: What is good for him is what's good for the country and the laws that align with this are proper, and those that do not will be ignored or changed where possible. The rule of law is anathema to authoritarians, and hence why they detest it. As individuals we might even feel the same about some laws. But in totality, the rule of, law and not by law is the foundation of our society, because its benefits are immense and usually taken for granted.


"To my friends, everything; to my enemies, the law"




Remember when Trump said you should get a green card with your diploma? Wasn't even a year ago:

https://x.com/DKThomp/status/1925631602589151325#m



can't wait to hear what all those earnest "Worried About Free Speech In Universities" right wingers will have to say about this, now it's just not getting heckled for being an arsehole


So much for "law and order" - this is about sycophancy toward an authoritarian who chooses his own rules.


That's what "conservatives" mean by "law and order". You obey them so they can put you in your place. They want to impose upon the rest of us, not be imposed upon.


As a staffer at Cornell and person who lives in the area, I worry most about losing students from mainland China. Whether this is an arbitrary Trumpism or the lid blows off in Taiwan matters little.


I heard University of Illinois bought a policy to protect against losing cash tuitions from Chinese grad students. Perhaps other universities have done the same.


I think it is more undergrads than grads that pay money, but I think that depends on the field.

For a physics PhD for instance at Cornell you usually get paid to teach your first two years and if all goes right do your actual research on a grant. In my case the prof had written a grant for the work I wanted to do which didn't get funded, I spent a summer thinking about the problem which helped us come back with a great grant proposal that got funded.

I know Masters of Engineering students pay their own way, maybe other departments are different. I remember there being a lot of Chinese graduate students 25 years ago but now I see lots of undergrads.



> I heard University of Illinois bought a policy to protect against losing cash tuitions from Chinese grad students

Who's selling that policy?

edit: looks like they started this in 2017! https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/11/29/university-il...

That's some forward thinking!



Hilarious if it's the CCP, who would probably have the greatest incentive to sell such a policy.


So now the Presidency is punishing institutions that refuse to create and share spy-dossiers on what their adult students are using their free-speech for.

In the last three months, we've collected many data points which are each each further down a slope. I suggest the slope is slippery, and has a very unfortunate end.

__________

[Edit] Predicting a future that might resonate more with YC folks: "Pursuant to Trump Executive Order XYZ, you must submit regular firewall logs and social-media handles for activity by your staff. Failure to comply will result in losing the ability to post H1-B positions."



DHS said that in addition to barring enrollment of future international students, “existing foreign students must transfer or lose their legal status.”

damn, Trump is really gunning for Harvard

not sure what rolling over for Trump looks like, but a lot of existing foreign students will be screwed unless something gives



I am going to get downvoted and flagged because I will bring up a topic that is not to be discussed here:

From a similar CNN article:

"Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem ordered her department to terminate Harvard’s Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification, making good on a promise made last month when she demanded the university hand over detailed records on its international students’ “illegal and violent activities” before April 30 or face the loss of its certification."

Okay, who could they possibly be talking about? Right. The Gaza protesters.

Miriam Adelson - $150m donated to Trump, second highest

Elon Musk is not the only one that bought the White House. So there is a genocide that if any of us tech people had some courage we could easily make some pretty wild visualizations of the before/after of Gaza maps, and the current full scale ethnic cleansing of it, but we can't bring it up. We're failing as tech people on this, but so is the whole world.



It could be Gaza protesters sure but it could be anyone. Previously legal residents were deported for minor traffic violations.

They’re trying to hit some targets for deportation numbers and shipping home “criminal” foreign students is an easy win.



Of course it's about the Gaza protestors, let's not pretend otherwise.


No, it can't be anyone. Please don't do this. This is about the Palestinian situation. They tried to pressure the TikTok purchase so they change their algorithm to show less Gaza deaths. It is simply about that, and there is also a money trail of top donors that corroborate this. They also made a show of arresting the Columbia Palestinian organizer. They are not looking for illegal Mexicans in the Ivy League.


Authoritarian regimes aren't exactly known for going "ah, good, we've done enough oppression now!"

They're targeting everyone they can find. Russian refugees (https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/11/science/russian-scientist...), Danish people who missed a form (https://www.mississippifreepress.org/ice-arrests-mississippi...), etc.



Yes, the Admin is even more pro-Israel (and by that I mean pro-Israeli gov/Netanyahu) than previous ones. But it's also using accusations of anti-Semitism at these universities as a cover to generally bring these "liberal" institutions to heel (as outlined in Project2025).

So it's not really about Gaza, Palestinians, or Jews. It's about control.



I find Trump's behavior to be incoherent. In some quarters he's virtually an anarcho-capitalist. In others, like this, he's anti-capitalist, intensely regulating a private business for no actual benefit.


Why is literally nobody considering the possible positive aspects to this move? Sometimes it’s shocking how unified the HN crowd is politically.


Why don't you start then? Tell us the positives so everyone can discuss it instead of just lazily dismissing everyone else's takes?


Well if it was a decision made by Harvard after serious deliberation and years of prep one could try to argue in good faith about the possible positive effects. Since this seems to be retaliation by the current admin due to Harvard's resistance to turning over vast amounts of records on intl. students... I think people are being less optimistic. I am curious, what do you think is beneficial about this? Please feel free to offer your perspective as well.


If a policy is so fucking stupid that everyone on the political spectrum is against it, it's more of a problem from the policy side and not the crowd.


You’re free to post whatever contrarian take you want. Be the change you want to see instead of complaining.


“Well, at least he made the trains run on time!”






Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact



Search:
联系我们 contact @ memedata.com