Darklang 开源
Darklang Goes Open Source

原始链接: https://blog.darklang.com/darklang-goes-open-source/

Dark Inc.,现更名为 Darklang Inc.,已在其最初选择源代码可用模式后,将所有代码库在 Apache 2.0 许可证下开源。最初的仅托管方式旨在确保可持续性和支持安全代码迁移等功能。然而,产品的成熟、用户要求更高开放性的反馈,以及向使用 CLI 的本地优先开发的转变改变了他们的想法。没有人希望在自己的机器上运行专有的语言二进制文件。开发者工具市场的演变也揭示了新的商机,例如对团队协作和 AI 驱动工具收费,这使得开源成为一条可行的道路。Darklang 的开源使其易于访问、可检查和社区所有,这与他们使编程民主化和确保平台长期持久性的目标一致。虽然生态系统中的许可问题仍然存在技术挑战,但核心平台的开源性质为未来的发展奠定了坚实的基础。

Hacker News 上的一篇帖子讨论了 Darklang 在其母公司 Dark Inc. 关闭后开源的情况。投资者在八年时间里都没看到这款产品的吸引力,也不想为它的消亡负责。最终达成了一项协议,将资产(Darklang 语言、博客等)出售给由前员工创建的一家新公司 Darklang Inc.。 评论者们讨论了这种对于软件公司来说不同寻常的过渡,并将其与传统的企业所有权变更和开源项目过渡进行了类比。一些人质疑购买一款没有吸引力的产品的价值,而另一些人则解释说,员工们购买这些资产是为了转型并实现他们自己的愿景。 讨论深入探讨了 Darklang 的历史、其“无需部署”编码的愿景以及过去的转型。人们对编程语言的资金模式进行了推测,并将其与 Unison 和 Mojo 等其他项目进行了比较。一些人持怀疑态度,另一些人则对 Darklang 的开源未来持乐观态度。许多人强调需要更好的文档和更清晰的核心用例解释。
相关文章

原文

As part of shutting down Dark Inc. and forming Darklang Inc., we've finally open-sourced all of our repositories. Our source code is now under the Apache License 2.0.

For years, we wrestled with questions of sustainability and how to build something that truly empowers developers. We've long believed in open source philosophically, but felt that Darklang's unique architecture and business model required a different approach.

Why We Initially Chose Source-Available

We originally designed Darklang as a hosted-only platform where you'd code at darklang.com and programs would instantly be live in production. We believed this centralized approach was necessary for features like safe code migration and unified deployment, and that offering self-hosting would undermine our sustainability model.

The core challenge was building something valuable while ensuring we could continue working on it long-term. Traditional open source funding models all had limitations, so Darklang was designed as "a language with a business model" - users with serious workloads would fund ecosystem development through our hosting platform.

What Changed Our Thinking

Three key shifts changed our perspective:

Product maturity and user feedback: The real barrier to Darklang's adoption was never licensing - it was product maturity. As we've gotten closer to building something people love, staying source-available started feeling like an unnecessary risk. We consistently heard that people wanted us to be more open.

Building for local-first development: Our technical direction evolved significantly. We're now building Darklang to run locally as a CLI, with the ability to deploy to our cloud or elsewhere. Nobody wants to run a proprietary language binary on their own machine.

New business opportunities: The developer tools market has matured since 2017. We now see successful companies charging for team collaboration features and AI-powered tools while keeping the core platform accessible. These create value that teams are willing to pay for, while always having the option to self-host.

Why Open Source

Open source enables Darklang to be accessible, inspectable, and community-owned. It aligns with our philosophy of democratizing programming and ensures the platform can persist and evolve regardless of any single company's fate.

We've learned how to deliver Darklang's key benefits - invisible infrastructure, deployless deployment, trace-driven development - without requiring our specific editor or hosting environment. This makes open source viable while preserving what makes Darklang special.

Open Questions

We're still exploring some interesting technical challenges around licensing in the Darklang ecosystem. GitHub handles this by attaching LICENSE.md files, but in a world where a package manager syncs types and functions directly, there are some neat challenges to think through. The core platform being open source gives us a solid foundation to build on.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com