规章制度,而非可再生能源,或解释了伊比利亚半岛的停电事件
Rules, Not Renewables, Might Explain the Iberian Blackout

原始链接: https://spectrum.ieee.org/spain-grid-failure

4月28日,西班牙和葡萄牙遭遇大范围停电,居民纷纷寻找答案。虽然官方调查尚未得出结论,但研究人员认为,反应功率分布不均,以及日益依赖可再生能源,可能是关键因素。可再生能源发电厂向电网输送过高电压,导致过电压,这可能引发了停电。 西班牙目前的电网法规没有充分激励或要求可再生能源发电厂管理反应功率,这与美国等国家不同。随着可再生能源越来越分散,反应功率的管理变得更加复杂,导致电网可能不稳定。 虽然官方报告仍在等待中,但电网运营商REE指出,传统发电机电压控制不足导致故障。除了反应功率外,与邻国的互联容量不足以及运营商对故障的反应迟缓也加剧了停电。最终,这次停电突显出需要更新电网法规,改进反应功率管理,加强互联互通,并为电网运营商提供更快、基于人工智能的决策支持,以防止未来发生大范围停电。

Hacker News 的一个帖子讨论了最近伊比利亚半岛停电的潜在原因,重点关注可再生能源的作用。原文暗示,可能是规则而不是可再生能源本身导致了停电。 一位评论者认为,可再生能源从设计上来说并非天生就是无功功率的来源,这可能导致电网不稳定。当电网频率下降时,可再生能源往往会关闭以避免损坏,这与能够“挺过去”的传统发电厂不同。这种行为可能会加剧电涌。 然而,其他评论者反驳说,现代公用事业规模的可再生能源项目,特别是风能和太阳能,都配备了电力电子设备,允许它们提供和消耗无功功率,这在许多地区(包括美国)的互联要求中是强制性的。这些系统可以对电压和频率变化做出反应,只有在达到特定限制后才会断开连接。 讨论强调了适当的电网管理和法规对于有效整合可再生能源的重要性。一些人认为,问题源于不完善的规则和市场机制,这些机制并没有激励或促使可再生能源为电网稳定性做出贡献。另一些人则指出,可能存在政治偏见影响了关于停电的叙述。官方调查结果仍在等待中。
相关文章

原文

On a leafy boulevard in central Madrid on the afternoon of 28 April, half a dozen residents stood in a loose semi-circle on the sidewalk, facing an apartment balcony. A man sat on the balcony with his battery-powered radio, the speaker oriented toward passersby whose mobile phones couldn’t get a signal due to a blackout that had swept Spain and Portugal. Everyone wanted to know the causes of the blackout, which had occurred at 12:33pm, local time. Some speculated it was a foreign attack, while others blamed unstable solar and wind generation, which together comprised 33 percent of Spain’s and 37 percent of Portugal’s electricity generation in 2024.

Almost two months after the Iberian blackout, the four official investigations into the cause haven’t yet released their conclusions, and people are still waiting to know the causes of the blackout. Yet academic researchers with access to voltage data, such as electrical engineer Antonio Gómez-Exposito, claim that there may have been sustained overvoltages, in which generating plants sent too high a voltage to the transmission grid, just before the grid’s frequency dropped, which implies a potential issue: poorly distributed reactive power sources. Such sources can help control voltages when renewables send power from the distribution level of the grid up to the transmission level, which is becoming more common as grids add more distributed renewables.

In the first days after the blackout, many outlets and experts focused on the frequency of the grid and the need for inertia, which refers to how spinning generators carry physical momentum that makes them slow to change the frequency of the alternating current (AC) they generate. Most equipment on an electrical grid must operate within fairly narrow range of a set frequency. Conventional power plants, such as combined-cycle natural gas or hydroelectric plants, can provide inertia, but newer sources such as photovoltaic solar power do not. So the inertia discourse was in part a discussion of how to incorporate direct current sources such as photovoltaics into an AC grid.

If overvoltages, rather than frequency drops, were larger contributors, then the discussion is still about renewables, but it depends more on reactive power than on frequency management. Reactive power is one component of any AC electrical distribution grid. It emerges from the phase shift between voltage and current as the grid stores and withdraws energy in electromagnetic fields. Reactive power helps to carry the active component of power along long-distance transmission lines, and grid operators must balance reactive power alongside active power, or they can get overloading or voltage fluctuations that force generators off the grid. “The problem is that the regulation of the grid doesn’t reward renewable plant operators for helping balance reactive power,” says electrical engineer José Daniel Lara at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, Colorado.

The shift toward more decentralized power production means that the amount of reactive power absorbed by transmission lines is changing, and the direction of flows of reactive power are also changing, making its regulation more complex. For example, Austria, Germany, and Japan have all begun regulating reactive power management to account for the effect of more distributed production.

So, the fact that more renewable energy is often more distributed than conventional sources may have contributed to a different reactive power profile on the Iberian grid. Yet “other operators, such as in the U.S., require or reward grid participants for helping balance this reactive power,” Lara says. Spain could do that, too, given its commitment to expanding the role of renewable, and therefore distributed, power. Yet its reactive power rules pre-date the flood of solar and wind energy that has reshaped the country’s grid (the main rules are from 2000, with a 2014 partial update). Today’s rules also exempt renewable plants from helping to lower voltage peaks, Gómez says, which is a mistake: “Today’s grids, with their high renewable penetration, can’t be managed like grids of the twentieth century when everything was fossil fuels and hydroelectric plants.”

In early June, Beatriz Corredor, the president of Spain’s grid operator, Red Eléctrica de España (REE), blamed the blackout on up to five near-simultaneous failures of conventional generators with sub-standard voltage control. REE is not blaming the failure on transmission short circuits, lack of electrical inertia, an information technology hitch, a reserve shortage, or excess voltage, she said in an interview on Spanish television. Corredor didn’t give a specific explanation for the failures she mentioned or name the plants that may have failed, but the implication is that the responsibility is at the distribution level, below the transmission level that REE manages.

Most grid failures this big have multiple causes, and there are other ways to build resilience, in addition to better reactive power management. For example, Spain and Portugal have very little interconnection capacity with neighboring France and Morocco. The EU recommends its member states have 10 percent interconnection capacity, rising to 15 percent by 2030, but Spain and Portugal have only 2 percent interconnectivity with the rest of the EU, and very little connectivity with Morocco.

Another contributor to reliance is how operators respond to local failures. Energy engineer Ricardo Bessa of the Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science in Porto, Portugal, is involved in a European research project called AI4RealNet that aims to provide grid operators with high-speed AI decision-making support when things go wrong, to avoid cascading events and blackouts. “It will mitigate, but it is not a silver bullet,” Bessa says. Just as importantly, it will help researchers to understand why a given failure or blackout occurred after the fact, but much faster than today’s methods.

Storage is another answer to preventing excess voltage from swamping a grid. Spain is building grid-scale storage, but so far has just over 3 GW in a grid with an installed capacity of around 129 GW. More storage capacity located near to generators would make it easier to handle reactive power when those generators produce too much of it.

It will be months before Spain’s official investigations release their conclusions, and meantime an European panel of grid operators is working on the problem, as are the hundredsof electrical operators on the peninsula who will want to avoid a likely decade-long legal fight over liability for the blackout.

In the meantime, the almost 60 million Spaniards and Portuguese affected by April’s blackout will have to turn their attention to researchers such as Gómez for insight into the blackout’s real cause. They are starting to patch together a mixture of public and private data and discuss openly the kinds of lessons regulators and industry may take from the blackout. “It’s going to force some changes,” Gómez says, “First will be operating procedures, which are always changing but they change slowly. Now it will be more agile.”

From Your Site Articles

Related Articles Around the Web

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com