发布了如何成为科学侦探的指南
Guidelines on how to be a scientific sleuth released

原始链接: https://osf.io/2kdez/wiki/home/

COSIG(开放科学诚信指南集)是一个开源项目,提供专家撰写的指南,以促进出版后同行评审和法医学元科学研究。其目标是使任何人都能够调查科学文献的完整性,即使没有特定领域的知识。目前,COSIG包含28份指南,涵盖图像分析和剽窃等一般主题,以及生物学、材料科学和统计学等专业领域。 指南可以单独下载,也可以下载合并的PDF版本。欢迎通过GitHub或电子邮件提出改进建议。COSIG采用CC BY-NC-SA 4.0许可,允许非商业性分发、改编和混搭,但需正确引用。提供了COSIG本身以及解释其动机的评论的多种引用格式(APA、MLA、芝加哥、BibTeX)。该项目最后更新于2025年6月13日。

This Hacker News thread discusses the importance of post-publication peer review in science. A user, btilly, highlights the cognitive bias that leads people to overestimate their abilities, especially in areas they care about. This bias hinders learning and improvement, as individuals reject feedback and become overconfident. This issue affects entire scientific fields, leading to flawed research and dismissal of conflicting evidence. While post-publication peer review isn't a perfect solution, it's a crucial feedback mechanism for identifying errors and improving scientific rigor. The original poster, crescit_eundo, quotes the project's introduction, emphasizing that anyone can participate in post-publication peer review and contribute to the integrity of scientific literature, especially with the help of guides provided by domain experts. The thread underscores the value of open scientific scrutiny and continuous improvement in research practices.
相关文章

原文

![COSIG Logo][1] ### **Anyone can do post-publication peer review.** ### **Anyone can be a steward of the scientific literature.** ### **Anyone can do forensic metascience.** ### **Anyone can sleuth.** However, investigating the integrity of the published scientific literature often requires domain-specific knowledge that not everyone will have. This open source project is a collection of guides written and maintained by publication integrity experts to distribute this domain-specific knowledge so that others can participate in post-publication peer review. COSIG currently hosts 28 guides and was last updated on 13 June 2025. Guides can be downloaded as [individual PDFs](https://osf.io/2kdez/files/osfstorage). A combined PDF with all guides included can be downloaded [here](https://osf.io/ynb8j). Suggestions to improve COSIG can be submitted by opening an issue on [COSIG's GitHub repo](https://github.com/cosig-pppr/cosig/issues) or by emailing [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]). Before contributing, read COSIG's [Contributing](https://github.com/cosig-pppr/cosig/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/cosig-pppr/cosig/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) pages. ## **Table of Contents** ### General guides * [PubPeer commenting best practices](https://osf.io/sghaq) * [Extracting vector graphics from a PDF](https://osf.io/n8fvw) * [The vertical line test](https://osf.io/e3nfr) * [Image duplication](https://osf.io/547re) * [Image compression artifacts](https://osf.io/e5vzr) * [Software for image forensics](https://osf.io/g23pf) * [Reporting publication integrity issues to publishers](https://osf.io/4edk2) * [Citations](https://osf.io/5vknq) * [Citations to retracted publications](https://osf.io/9q3as) * [Formulaic research](https://osf.io/24dhu) * [Plagiarism of text](https://osf.io/ntcb4) * [Common dismissive responses to integrity concerns](https://osf.io/7w5ys) * [Suspicious venues](https://osf.io/vrk7e) * [Ethical approval of human subjects research](https://osf.io/6mwhe) ### Biology and medicine * [Antibody validation](https://osf.io/c6qmj) * [Misidentified and non-verifiable cell lines](https://osf.io/d7we5) * [Nucleotide sequence reagents](https://osf.io/2egvz) * [Tumor burden](https://osf.io/gzk8v) ### Materials sciences and engineering * [X-ray diffraction patterns - Scherrer's equation](https://osf.io/hf7qy) * [X-ray diffraction patterns - data duplication](https://osf.io/685xa) * [Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy](https://osf.io/shfjy) * [Elemental composition](https://osf.io/st8up) * [Tauc plots](https://osf.io/gpxvf) ### Mathematics, statistics and computer science * [Evaluating the performance of binary classifiers](https://osf.io/pvr4a) * [Evaluating the performance of multiclass classifiers](https://osf.io/5x2rp) * [Granularity-related inconsistency of means (GRIM)](https://osf.io/67bp4) * [Standard deviation versus standard error](https://osf.io/hp4yd) * [Multiple hypothesis correction](https://osf.io/csxd5) ## **License and citation** Except where otherwise indicated, all material in COSIG is available under a [CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). That means that you are free to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as COSIG is properly cited. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms. ### Citing COSIG itself #### APA style citation ``` (2025, June 4). Collection of Open Science Integrity Guides. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2KDEZ ``` #### MLA style citation ``` “Collection of Open Science Integrity Guides.” OSF, 4 June 2025. Web. ``` #### Chicago style citation ``` 2025. “Collection of Open Science Integrity Guides.” OSF. June 5. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2KDEZ. ``` #### BibTeX entry ``` @misc{cosig, title={Collection of Open Science Integrity Guides}, url={https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2KDEZ}, publisher={OSF}, year={2025}, month={June} } ``` ### Citing a commentary explaining the motivation behind COSIG #### APA style citation ``` Richardson, R. (2025). The Collection of Open Science Integrity Guides (COSIG): Expanding participation in post-publication peer review. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15564777 ``` #### MLA style citation ``` Richardson, R. The Collection of Open Science Integrity Guides (COSIG): Expanding Participation in Post-publication Peer Review. Zenodo, 4 June 2025, doi:10.5281/zenodo.15564777. ``` #### Chicago style citation ``` Richardson, Reese. “The Collection of Open Science Integrity Guides (COSIG): Expanding Participation in Post-publication Peer Review”. Zenodo, June 4, 2025. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15564777. ``` #### BibTex entry ``` @article{cosig_commentary, author={Richardson, Reese}, title={The Collection of Open Science Integrity Guides (COSIG): Expanding participation in post-publication peer review}, month={June}, year={2025}, publisher={Zenodo}, doi={10.5281/zenodo.15564777}, url={https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15564777} } ``` [1]: https://mfr.osf.io/export?url=https://osf.io/download/uqz3x/?direct=%26mode=render&format=2400x2400.jpeg

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com