Batteries and Buildings

原始链接: https://mtende.blog/batteries-vs-no-batteries

Software can be categorized as "batteries-included" (works out-of-the-box with all necessary components) or "no-batteries" (requires external packages). Batteries-included frameworks, like Express or LazyVim, offer easier development by abstracting complexities, allowing focus on core functionality. However, this abstraction can hinder troubleshooting and lead to bloat with unused features. No-batteries frameworks, like Flask, demand more initial setup but offer granular control and avoid unnecessary code. While tedious, the customizability can lead to more optimized architectures. The ideal framework provides a balance: offering pre-built components while allowing selective removal of unnecessary parts, essentially creating a "rechargeable battery" approach. This pluggable design caters to diverse needs, combining the convenience of batteries-included with the flexibility of no-batteries.

This Hacker News thread discusses an article titled "Batteries and Buildings." The original commenter, detourdog, initially expected the article to be about backup power for buildings, but realized the author, sonderotis, was using batteries as a metaphor for software deployment readiness. agumonkey agreed, mentioning Tesla's exploration of batteries as structural elements and the potential for walls to serve multiple purposes. detourdog then described using walls as thermal mass through external insulation to regulate interior temperature. The author, sonderotis, acknowledged the misleading title and plans to improve it in the future. Agumonkey then analogized Django to a rechargeable battery due to its modular and swappable components. The thread then transitions into an advertisement for Y Combinator's Fall 2025 batch and a footer.
相关文章

原文
联系我们 contact @ memedata.com