当一个为运动而建立的品牌失去其一些重点时会发生什么?
What happens when a brand built for sport loses some of its focus?

原始链接: https://doinghandstands.substack.com/p/the-recovery-run

倒立的卡特(Carter)反映了耐克(Nike)的旅程,这使他的公司对清晰度的关注相似。耐克最初的成功源于明确的愿景:为每个运动员带来创新。这种运动员首先的方法推动了Waffle Trainer和Air Jordan等标志性的创新,从运动到生活方式无缝过渡。 但是,耐克对文化相关性的追求导致了人们的注意力模糊,追逐短暂的趋势,而不是通过运动来定义文化。这淡化了品牌的清晰度,为竞争对手开放了机会。 现在,耐克(Nike)在首席执行官埃利奥特·希尔(Elliott Hill)的领导下,建议核心:体育和运动员。 “现在的胜利”策略优先考虑以运动员为中心的创新,简化运营和增强市场重点。早期的迹象很有希望,股价反映了新的信心。 卡特得出的结论是,与体育中的清晰度一样,清晰度是一项持续的学科,需要拒绝做所有事情,并专注于核心目的。对于寻求清晰度的品牌,他建议采用“运动员优先”的思维方式,即使在具有挑战性的情况下,也可以完全确定其等效的性能并专门为目标受众服务。

黑客新闻讨论围绕耐克失去关注点以及对其品牌的影响。一位评论者强调了耐克的直接消费者策略,这表明它为在物理零售空间中竞争品牌创造了机会。另一位用户引用了健身影响者的论点,即耐克缺乏有效的影响者营销策略,这是现代服装品牌的关键组成部分。 进一步的批评着重于设计变化,其中一位用户感叹平台鞋底的普遍性并发现它们不受欢迎。另一个人用口号引用了耐克广告牌“你不能赢。作为聋哑人,失去联系。一位评论者驳斥了原始文章,说“基本上什么都没有”,质疑短期股票波动是否表明了真正的公司周转。总体而言,对话对耐克在营销,产品设计和整体品牌消息传递方面的当前方向表示关注。
相关文章

原文

I’m Carter, I lead growth and operations at Handstand [a bit more on me here]. I grew up just outside of Portland, Oregon - naturally, Nike has been in my orbit and part of my life since day one (see below: “Dear Santa, please bring me a pair of Chicago 1s”). It’s an inspiring brand we discuss and think about often, so I decided to write about it. Excited to continue sharing more perspectives from different voices on the team.

“When you see only problems, you’re not seeing clearly.” - Phil Knight, Shoe Dog.

We talk a lot about clarity at Handstand. When people ask what we do, our answer is simple: we help organizations see clearly. The process of going from unclear to clear is not a one-size-fits-all journey; it takes time, effort, the right people, and most importantly, acceptance that something - often what once worked - is no longer working. Uncovering and unpacking that something is step one.

In 1964, Phil Knight and Bill Bowerman founded Blue Ribbon Sports. Today, you know them as Nike. The vision was - and still is - simple: If you have a body, you are an athlete. Clarity of purpose (bringing innovation to every athlete) has been the north star for 50+ years.

In 1971, they saw a problem (opportunity?): Oregon's Hayward Field was transitioning to an artificial surface, and Bowerman wanted a sole that could grip without spikes. The obsession with running led Bowerman to take his wife's waffle iron into his workshop and experiment with rubber, creating a sole with a lightweight grip to increase speed. That focus & clarity turned breakfast into breakthrough - and the rest is, as they say, history.

The Waffle Trainer was extremely popular with runners. Off-court demand was a natural byproduct. Athlete first, lifestyle second. Nike’s running shoes were selling so well that annual sales kept doubling. Athlete-driven innovation clearly hit an aspirational lifestyle nerve. If I have a body, I am an athlete. And my shoes say so. The Swoosh meant go time, whether you were running to break a record or to catch the bus to school.

There are countless moments of Nike's athlete innovations leading to widespread cultural adoption. Air Jordan. Shox. Flyknit. FuelBand. Nike+. Each started with sport → solved for performance → and probably ended up in your closet. Somewhere, the winning formula of products going from on the track to off the track… got off track

Writer’s note: Nike has grown into a multi-billion-dollar, multi-national, complex organization with complicated supply chains and even more complicated shareholder expectations. I’m not here to make suggestions out of hubris that clarity is the only solution. I’m here to draw parallels - as a consumer, fan, and today, a commentator.

For decades, Nike followed a clear formula: solve for the athlete, the rest will follow. Innovation didn’t start with moodboards or IG metrics - it started with the unmet needs of humans pushing the limit. Somewhere between collabs, the stream of drops, and category expansion, clarity seemingly blurred. Decisions were likely made without asking: will this bring inspiration and innovation to every athlete in the world? This is understandable. If you’re big enough to just do it all, why not try?

Over time, Nike began matching the speed of culture vs. the speed of sport. And the speed of culture is relentless. Singles on Spotify are 90 seconds or less. Netflix series release weekly. What’s attention grabbing in the morning is forgotten by lunch. When you try to match that pace, fatigue is all you’re left with - internally and externally. It’s the tax of chasing culture instead of defining it.

The pendulum swung from a tight, athlete-first lens to a high-output lifestyle POV. But sport moves on its own terms - the buzzerbeaters, impossible winning streaks, and comebacks nobody saw coming never arrive on schedule. They simply can’t be manufactured into - or out of - an algorithm. On the flip side, these are the exact moments that provide the most clarity. Jordan’s flu game is Nike. Faith Kipyegon vs. the 4-Minute Mile is Nike. The Serena Slam is Nike. Giving the thumbs up to a fellow runner you see struggling up an incline - and the only thing you have in common is your shoes - is Nike. These are the moments - from elite to everyday athletes - a winning strategy is meant to to empower.

As in sports, the sight of weakness gets exploited. Upstarts and legacy brands didn’t aim for clarity - it was the byproduct of conviction around a singular message. Unwavering and consistent. On focused on performance and made its case through innovation and Swiss precision. Alo honed and owned wellness as a lifestyle. Bandit made the running community their brand. And New Balance - refactored its marketing and partnered with next-gen athletes, emphasizing We Got Now. In an increasingly high-output world, clarity stands out. Meaning > more.

30-year Nike veteran Elliott Hill returned to the company as CEO in 2024. His vision is simple: return to its foundation, sport and the athlete. “We lost our obsession with sport. Moving forward, we will lead with sport and put the athlete at the center of every decision” said Hill in a recent earnings call. The strategy is called ‘Win Now’ - and it isn’t about reinvention, it’s about recommitment. To bring inspiration and innovation to every athlete in the world. That’s the lens for the work.

Hill didn’t just talk about clarity, he’s operationalizing it - streamlining inventory, reducing discounting, and forming tactical teams to sharpen Nike’s GTM. And it’s working - as of July 10, 2025, Nike’s stock is up nearly 18% over the past 30 days amid growing confidence in the ‘Win Now’ focus. Internally, the process will likely be - and likely is - painful, so is sport. Teams will change, fans will be lost, doors will close. But anything enduring is bigger than the sum of its parts. The end result is strength, resilience, and ensuring the best days of the brand are ahead of it, not behind it.

That’s the takeaway for any brand. Clarity isn’t something you’ll find on an explore page - it’s an ongoing discipline. It’s a refusal to do everything just because you can. It’s knowing which moments are yours to own - and which to let pass. It’s constantly asking: is this what we’re here to do? If the answer is no, then just don’t. And if there isn’t a bit of tension in your choices, you probably aren’t saying no enough. Clarity is the best constraint.

If you’re a brand or marketer trying to find some level of clarity - maybe start with an athlete first mindset. Not literally, but philosophically. What’s the equivalent of performance in your category? Who or what is the equivalent of the athlete you’re here to serve? Build for them and only them - even when it hurts.

I’m going for a run.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com