中央情报局泄密者利用“来源和方法”的说辞来攻击国家情报局长图尔西·加巴德。
CIA Leakers Weaponize 'Sources And Methods'-Talking Points To Target DNI Tulsi Gabbard

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/cia-leakers-weaponize-sources-and-methods-talking-points-target-dni-tulsi-gabbard

根据情报界(IC)内部消息,国家情报总监(DNI)图尔西·加巴德因发布一份敏感的2017年众议院情报委员会(HPSCI)报告而面临重大反对。该报告解构了情报界对俄罗斯干预2016年选举的评估(ICA)——这份评估是导致突袭马阿拉歌庄的调查的基础。 据报道,中央情报局(CIA)对这份报告的发布“非常不满”,因为HPSCI报告详细列出了他们用来捏造关于俄罗斯和唐纳德·特朗普的虚假信息的线人和方法。加巴德拥有独特的权力,可以在未经情报界批准的情况下解密信息,她推动完全公开该报告,尽管有人试图进行删减。 值得注意的是,加巴德在政府内部几乎是孤立地运作,缺乏卡什·帕特尔、约翰·拉特克利夫和帕姆·邦迪等人的支持。她继续努力揭露情报界的武器化行为可能会导致她被撤职,特别是如果她挑战Palantir的影响力。尽管如此,她的职位让她获得了前所未有的访问所有情报部门信息的权限,让她能够“揭露”以前隐藏的活动。

相关文章

原文

Authored by 'sundance' via TheConservativeTreehouse.com,

Insiders within the Intelligence Community (IC), and specifically ongoing operators within the CIA, are targeting Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard...

The least understood issue right now, is how isolated and alone Tulsi Gabbard is on her mission to bring sunlight to the Intelligence Community weaponization and corruption.

…”There is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things”…

The IC uses various media leaks and narrative engineers as the tools against their enemy; in this case DNI Tulsi Gabbard.

The most common arrow in their manipulative quiver is the term “sources and methods.” 

The Washington Post notes how the Intelligence Community is upset about DNI Tulsi Gabbard compromising their ‘sources and methods’ by releasing the House Intelligence Report that deconstructed the Russiagate Intelligence Community Assessment.

What has them so upset is Tulsi’s release of the House Intel report. This is the report that drove the FBI to raid Mar-a-Lago in an effort to retrieve it from Trump. This is the report that outlines how the CIA fabricated the Russiagate claims. Tulsi is being targeted for releasing this specific report. That tells you how important it is to the CIA.

WASHINGTON DC – […] The document that Gabbard ordered released on July 23 is a 46-page report stemming from a review begun in 2017 by majority Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee. It takes issue with U.S. intelligence agencies’ finding earlier that year that Russian President Vladimir Putin developed a preference for Trump over Democrat Hillary Clinton and aspired to help him win the election.

[…] The House report is the most sensitive document the Trump administration has yet released, and details of how its publication occurred have not been previously reported.

[…] The document contains multiple references to CIA human sources reporting on Putin’s plans. Such sources are among the agency’s most closely guarded secrets. After the report was completed in 2020, it was considered so sensitive that it remained in storage at the CIA rather than on Capitol Hill.

[…] as the Trump administration prepared to release the report publicly, there were multiple versions of it circulating, some with more redactions to protect sensitive information, current and former U.S. officials said. Gabbard, who has led the administration’s effort to relitigate the 2016 campaign, pushed to release as much as possible, they said.

“CIA put forward their proposed redactions and edits to the document,” said a person familiar with the process. Gabbard “has greater declassification authority than all other intelligence elements and is not required to get their approval prior to release.”

Trump then approved the publication of the version from Gabbard’s office “with minimal redactions and no edits,” this person said.

[…] It is unclear exactly how Trump gave his approval, or if he examined the competing versions of the House report beforehand. The White House did not respond to a request for comment. (READ MORE)

The HPSCI report release is what is driving the CIA bananas.

Despite efforts by Donald Trump to declassify the HPSCI report before leaving office, the CIA never released it.  No one except the internal Intelligence Community (CIA/DNI) had seen the HPSCI report until Tulsi Gabbard released it on July 22nd.  This is a key point, because the HPSCI report touches on all of the other declassified evidence recently released.

The authors of the HPSCI report had reviewed all of the same information John Durham reviewed.  The HPSCI report walks through the entire construct of the Intelligence Community Assessment ordered by President Obama on December 6, 2016.

Arguably, because of the underlying evidence reviewed to produce it, the HPSCI report is the most critical of the declassified release in the last few months. The HPSCI report walks through the timeline, as the ICA was created between early to late December 2016.

Do NOT forget. Tulsi Gabbard is essentially all alone on this mission of sunlight.

Tulsi’s isolation is the one issue people do not quite seem to understand.

Pam Bondi (AG) isn’t with her. Director Kash Patel (FBI) and Director John Ratcliffe (CIA) are not with her. Susie Wiles (CoS) is not with her. In all of these efforts DNI Tulsi Gabbard is all alone.

The Israel-First media and activist group is also aligned against her.

If you doubt that’s the scenario, show me a single voice from inside the administration who stood up to (even gently) defend her when Tulsi was attacked about her position on the Iran nuclear capabilities.

Tulsi is all alone.  She is all alone on this mission and even physically all alone when on task within the administration. Watch for it and you can clearly see it.  Once you see it, you cannot unsee it.

This is not about President Trump per se’. The Office of the President is not a significant participant at the moment, and those who control power within the Oval Office keep Tulsi isolated and away from the President.  However, if DNI Tulsi Gabbard turns against Palantir, she will be removed. Full stop.

We saw those Palantir boundary rails surface when DNI Gabbard was not fully behind the bombing of Iran.

People argue against the power of the ODNI, saying the office is a functionary only.  These are historically old arguments by people who do not fully understand the nature of the silo system.

Yes, this is the typical viewpoint; however, readers on these pages will note that I have said repeatedly for years now, the DNI position can be used for powerfully good purposes.

The DNI can look at anything in Washington DC.  Anything, inside any silo.

As noted by the angered WaPo, “Gabbard has greater declassification authority than all other intelligence elements and is not required to get their approval prior to release.” 

The DNI can look at anything in any silo and put sunlight upon it.  Yet, people claim the DNI has no power.  lol

The ability to bring sunlight is power.

Go Tulsi!

Loading recommendations...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com