人工智能效率?别逗了。
AI Efficiency? Give Me a Break

原始链接: https://luolink.substack.com/p/ai-efficiency-give-me-a-break

围绕人工智能“解放生产力”的炒作显得越来越具有讽刺意味。与其节省时间,不断涌现的新“必备”人工智能工具——从ChatGPT到无数专业平台——反而制造了一个令人疲惫、永无止境的学习循环。每掌握一项工具,很快就会过时,加剧了对营销宣传中承诺的失业和有利可图的“人工智能副业”的恐惧和焦虑。 作者详细描述了追逐最新功能,花费数小时进行更新和教程的沮丧经历,结果发现人工智能生成的内容往往缺乏客户所需的细微差别,需要大量的手动修改。这种持续的追求并未提高产出质量,反而*增加了*工作量和压力。 最终,文章提倡一种更谨慎的方法:有选择地采用真正有用的工具,进行集中的学习冲刺,并对无休止的“颠覆”叙事保持健康的怀疑态度。这是一个呼吁,优先考虑人类的创造力和判断力,而不是追逐每一个新趋势,并质疑真正的生产力在于掌握工具还是知道何时忽略它们。

相关文章

原文

I recently watched an AI expert on stage enthusiastically proclaiming that "AI will liberate human productivity" to thunderous applause. Sitting at my desk, staring at the 37th "Essential AI Tools You Must Learn" popup of the day, I couldn't help but think: Give me a break. I'm ten times more exhausted now than I ever was before.

I remember when I first encountered AI tools. When ChatGPT burst onto the scene, I was as excited as an explorer discovering a new continent. I spent an entire weekend mastering prompt engineering techniques, convinced I was finally riding the wave of the future.

And then what happened?

A month later, GPT-4 launched. All those prompt strategies I'd painstakingly learned suddenly felt outdated.

Two months later, Claude appeared, supposedly superior for writing tasks.

Three months later, Midjourney updated to V6, rendering all my carefully memorized parameters obsolete.

Four months later, domestic large language models sprouted like mushrooms after rain — Wenxin Yiyan, Tongyi Qianwen, iFlytek Spark... each claiming to "better understand Chinese."

My bookmarks folder now houses 128 AI tool websites. From writing to image generation, coding to video creation, data analysis to presentation design. Every single one has been shared by someone on social media with the caption "Don't learn this and you'll fall behind!"

The most maddening part? These tools update faster than I change my underwear. Just when I've familiarized myself with an interface, it gets redesigned overnight. Just when I've memorized a workflow, next week brings "revolutionary new features."

My morning routine no longer starts with coffee — it begins with checking AI tool update logs. I live in constant fear of missing some "game-changing" feature and being looked down upon in the next team meeting: "You're still using the old version?"

At night, lying in bed, my mind races with thoughts of all the new tools I haven't learned yet. I toss and turn, unable to sleep, eventually reaching for my phone to scroll through more AI content until 2 AM when exhaustion finally wins.

The next day, sporting dark circles under my eyes, when colleagues ask why I look so haggard, I say, "I was learning AI last night." They give me admiring looks: "Such dedication!"

Dedication, my ass. I was too anxious to sleep!

Even worse is the omnipresent "AI threat" marketing bombardment.

"ChatGPT is Here — These 10 Jobs Will Disappear!" "Employees Who Can't Use AI Will Be Replaced by Those Who Can!" "Is Your Job Safe in the AI Era?" "30-Year-Old Programmer Replaced by AI, Now Delivering Food!"

My phone pushes at least 20 of these "anxiety generators" daily. Open any career-related app and you're greeted by wall-to-wall "AI will replace humans" articles.

The worst offenders are the course sellers. They terrorize you with "learn AI or perish" while peddling "AI monetization secrets." $39 beginner courses, $199 advanced workshops, $999 masterclasses.

"Master This AI Prompt Template and Earn $10K Monthly!" "I Made Enough for My First House in 3 Months of AI Side Hustles!" "Former Google Engineer Reveals How to Surf the AI Wave!"

These headlines make me itch with FOMO, creating this nagging feeling that everyone else is getting rich with AI while I'm still doing things manually like a chump. I've impulse-bought several courses, only to discover they're all rehashed basic content with fancy packaging.

The most ironic part? The slides these "AI experts" use in their courses are obviously AI-generated. Cookie-cutter templates, aesthetically bankrupt visuals, vapid content. I paid to learn about AI and got scammed by AI-generated marketing materials.

Sometimes I genuinely miss the old days. Back then, design meant Photoshop and Illustrator — learn them once, use them for years. Now? Every day brings new AI design tools promising "professional posters in 3 seconds" or "videos created in 1 minute."

But here's the kicker: after using these tools, I discovered AI-generated content is mind-numbingly generic and creatively bankrupt. When clients see AI-generated design mockups, their first reaction is always: "This looks very... AI-ish. Can you make it more human?"

So I end up manually adjusting and optimizing everything anyway. AI tools haven't reduced my workload — they've added learning costs and communication overhead.

Lately, the urge to disconnect grows stronger daily. Turn off all AI news notifications, uninstall these "essential AI tools," return to the most primitive working state. Think with pen and paper, create with traditional software, stop being dragged forward by every "revolutionary" tool.

I'm reminded of a sci-fi movie from childhood where humans became so dependent on robot servants that their limbs atrophied and they eventually couldn't even walk. Are we similarly being "served" by AI to the point of losing our capacity for independent thought?

Yesterday, I tried writing copy without any AI assistance and discovered my writing abilities had deteriorated without my noticing. Metaphors and descriptions that once flowed naturally now require extended contemplation. This made me question even more deeply: is AI helping us or replacing us?

Here's what really gets me: all these AI tools promise to save time and boost productivity, but I spend more time learning them than actually using them productively. It's like buying a sports car that requires a new driver's license every month.

I calculated my "AI learning time" last week: 2 hours daily reading about new tools, 1 hour watching tutorial videos, 30 minutes testing features, and another hour trying to integrate them into my actual workflow. That's 4.5 hours of my day consumed by the promise of efficiency.

Meanwhile, my actual productive work — the stuff that pays my bills — gets squeezed into the remaining hours. I'm working longer days to accommodate all this "productivity enhancement."

The cruel irony? My output quality hasn't dramatically improved. Sure, I can generate a blog post outline faster, but I still need to research, fact-check, and refine everything. I can create a logo concept quickly, but clients still want 47 revisions. The bottlenecks in creative work were never about speed — they were about iteration, collaboration, and achieving that ineffable quality we call "good."

Social media makes everything worse. My LinkedIn feed is a non-stop parade of "I automated my entire workflow with AI" humble-brags and "How I 10x'd my productivity" success stories. Everyone's apparently crushing it except me.

But here's what these posts don't mention: the time invested in learning these systems, the failures and false starts, the ongoing maintenance required. They show you the highlight reel, not the behind-the-scenes struggle.

I've started wondering: are these people actually more productive, or are they just better at marketing their productivity theater?

I'm not anti-AI or a technology Luddite. I'm simply advocating for a more sustainable relationship with technological change. Here's what I'm trying to practice:

Selective Adoption: Instead of chasing every new tool, I'm sticking with 2-3 AI assistants that genuinely improve my core work.

Learning Sprints: Rather than constantly staying "up to date," I dedicate specific periods for exploring new tools, then focus on mastering them.

Skeptical Consumption: I've unfollowed most AI influencers and course sellers. Their business model depends on keeping me perpetually anxious and inadequate.

Human-First Thinking: I try to solve problems with human creativity first, then see if AI can enhance the solution, not replace the thinking.

The tech industry has always run on manufactured urgency. Remember when everyone "had to learn" blockchain? Mobile-first design? The Internet of Things? Big Data? Each wave promised to revolutionize everything, and while some delivered incremental improvements, most faded into background utilities.

AI is different — it's genuinely powerful. But the current hype cycle is unsustainable. The breathless pace of "disruption" serves marketing departments and venture capitalists more than actual human productivity.

Maybe true AI efficiency isn't about learning every new tool or staying ahead of every trend. Maybe it's about developing judgment: knowing when to adopt, when to wait, and when to ignore the noise entirely.

To the marketing gurus selling AI anxiety: if AI is truly as revolutionary as you claim, why are you still grinding out content marketing and affiliate commissions? Shouldn't you be sipping cocktails on a beach while your AI empire runs itself?

The rest of us — the tired, the overwhelmed, the perpetually behind — maybe we can give ourselves permission to be selective. To be strategic. To be human in an age of artificial intelligence.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to get back to actual work. And I'm really hoping no new "game-changing AI tool" launches while I'm writing this sentence.

Written during another late night of AI information overload

Thanks for reading! If you found this relatable, you're not alone. Let's connect on LinkedIn where I promise to post less about AI productivity hacks and more about the messy reality of modern work.

Tags: #ArtificialIntelligence #Productivity #WorkLife #Technology #DigitalWellbeing #AI #FutureOfWork

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com